Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U vs AMD Ryzen 3 7320U vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 3700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 7 3700U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U should be slightly ahead the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U.

AMD Ryzen 3 7320U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 7320U

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320U is a mobile processor for cheap laptops of the Mendocino series. It integrates four older Zen 2 cores (similar to the Ryzen 4000 series like the Ryzen 3 4300U). The CPU cores clock from 2.4 GHz (base) to 4.1 GHz (single core Turbo) and can use 4 MB L3 cache. Thanks to SMT/Hyperthreading, the CPU can work on 8 threads simultaneously. The integrated memory controller only supports fast LPDDR5 memory (5500 MHz max.). Compared to the fastest Mendocino model the Ryzen 5 7520U, the 7320U offers lower clocked CPU cores (400 MHz base, and 200 MHz Turbo).

The integrated graphics adapter (Radeon 610M iGPU) uses the modern RDNA 2 architecture, but only 2 CUs (128 shaders) and clocks with up to 1.9 GHz.

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the 7320U, as of September 2023. Expect the chip to be about as fast as the Ryzen 3 3100 (four Zen 2 cores running up to 3.9 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Mendocino series chips are produced on a relatively modern 6nm FinFET process at TSMC and should offer a good power efficiency. The R3 7320U is rated at 8-15 W TDP and therefore well suited for thin and light laptops.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 3500U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April  2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 5 3500U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 5 3500U should be ahead the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz) and nearly on par with the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U (2.2 - 3.8 GHz).

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700UAMD Ryzen 3 7320UAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
CodenameZen+Mendocino-U (Zen 2)Zen+
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U « 2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U2.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2300 - 4000 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
4 x 4.1 GHz AMD Zen 2
4 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm6 nm12 nm
SocketAM4AM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTLPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 3500U
24.7 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 354     avg: 361.5     median: 361.5 (39%)     max: 369 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1328     avg: 1339     median: 1338.5 (3%)     max: 1349 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
658 Points (4%)
min: 611     avg: 624     median: 624 (4%)     max: 637 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
149 Points (41%)
min: 140     avg: 142     median: 142 (39%)     max: 144 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
16735 MIPS (10%)
min: 15910     avg: 16221     median: 16220.5 (9%)     max: 16531 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3680 MIPS (43%)
min: 3432     avg: 3474     median: 3474 (41%)     max: 3516 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
3.6 fps (6%)
min: 3.36     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (6%)     max: 3.6 fps
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
785 Seconds (6%)
min: 786     avg: 796     median: 795.5 (6%)     max: 805 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
6539 Points (16%)
min: 5150     avg: 5781     median: 5781 (14%)     max: 6412 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
43514 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2098 Points (5%)
min: 5629     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (15%)     max: 6090 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
9338 Points (17%)
min: 8547     avg: 8809     median: 8808.5 (16%)     max: 9070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2706 Points (11%)
min: 2595     avg: 2638     median: 2638 (11%)     max: 2681 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1343 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
4190 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
808 Points (31%)
863 Points (33%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
3018 Points (5%)
2824 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
839 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3091 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3928 Points (39%)
3820 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
11249 Points (11%)
10419 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1278 ms (1%)
min: 1097     avg: 1211     median: 1211 (1%)     max: 1325 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
27979 Points (20%)
min: 27185     avg: 27437     median: 27437 (20%)     max: 27689 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
142 Points (25%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 7320U → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 01. 06:44:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11332 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14611 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11334 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759293862s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 Oct 2025 05:17:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11332 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 11332 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14611 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#11 got single benchmarks 14611 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11334 +0.003s ... 0.023s

#13 got single benchmarks 11334 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.043s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.043s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)