Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Intel Core i5-10400F

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800X3D

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D is an 8-core desktop processor with a large level 3 cache (3DV cache) that is aimed mostly for increased gaming performance. It offers 8 Zen 3 based cores clocked at 3.4 - 4.5 GHz and therefore a bit slower than the 3.4 - 4.7 GHz of the R7 5800X. The power consumption of both chips is rated at 105 Watt (TDP) and the efficiency compared to Alder Lake desktop CPUs is rather good.

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3DIntel Core i5-10400F
CodenameVermeer (Zen3)Comet Lake
SeriesAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)Intel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X compare3.7 - 4.8 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D « 3.4 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3400 - 4500 MHz2900 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache96 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 166 / 12
TDP105 Watt65 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
SocketAM4 (1331)LGA1200
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2DDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
$155 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5800X3D
37.5 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
30.3 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
14317 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1452 Points (61%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
566 Points (62%)
438 Points (48%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5479 Points (13%)
3201 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2413 Points (15%)
1332 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
241 Points (67%)
180 Points (50%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.2 Points (35%)
14.4 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.8 Points (66%)
2 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6008 Points (36%)
6719 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
42010 Points (30%)
36564 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
47901 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8849 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
92.6 s (1%)
134.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
6.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
14431 Points (23%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
69518 MIPS (40%)
36731 MIPS (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6799 MIPS (80%)
5064 MIPS (60%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
138.3 fps (3%)
81.2 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
292 fps (7%)
228.5 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.1 fps (34%)
11.2 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.8 GB/s (36%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
212.6 Seconds (1%)
332.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14479 Points (31%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.4 s (1%)
19.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
385.5 s (2%)
470.4 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
27236 Points (67%)
14539 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
84919 Points (69%)
62086 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
85531 Points (69%)
61795 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
86170 Points (69%)
62883 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
22127 Points (56%)
11914 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28938 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11809 Points (50%)
7548 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2166 Points (52%)
1489 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
12050 Points (47%)
6726 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1622 Points (62%)
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (46%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
10856 Points (19%)
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1526 Points (7%)
1217 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10836 Points (34%)
6349 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7187 Points (72%)
5587 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43687 Points (43%)
25403 Points (25%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
849 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
215 Points (39%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1770 Points (66%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
226 Watt (39%)
135.8 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
209 Watt (38%)
125.5 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
102 Watt (67%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
11.5 Points per Watt (9%)
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 70% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 18. 23:42:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14390 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760823778s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 Oct 2025 05:21:56 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14390 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 14390 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.063s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)