Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 is an eight-core desktop processor that can handle sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT). This technology is equivalent to Intel's Hyper-Threading. Launched in April 2018, the Ryzen 7 2700 is the second fastest Ryzen 7 processor and is much more economical than its flagship sibling. The Ryzen 7 2700 has a 65 W TDP, which is nearly 50% more efficient than the 105 W TDP Ryzen 7 2700 X. This energy efficiency comes at a cost to performance though.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has a base clock speed of 3.2 GHz, which can be boosted by Extended Frequency Range (XFR) up to 4.1 GHz. The power gain is still high in multi-threaded applications, although this is some way off the Ryzen 7 2700X. The Ryzen 7 2700 benefits from AMD's new Zen+ architecture, with a greater number of instructions per cycle (IPC) and higher clock speeds than last year's Zen chips. The Ryzen 7 2700's eight cores are divided into two clusters that are connected by Infinity Fabric, a subset of HyperTransport. Each cluster has its own L3 cache.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has good performance in games. However, if it is operating at a lower base clock because of low TDP, then the Ryzen 7 2700 falls behind the Ryzen 5 2600 in gaming benchmarks. This behaviour could be because many games currently lack multi-core support. Hence, games rely more on clock speed more than core count.

Detailed information, benchmarks and values can be found in our review of the Ryzen 7 2700.

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3200U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a dual-core SoC designed for laptops that was announced in January 2019. The Ryzen features two Zen cores with support for the thread-doubling SMT tech, clocked at 2.6 GHz - 3.5 GHz. The built-in Radeon RX Vega 3 iGPU has 3 CUs (192 unified shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. The default TDP is 15 W which makes the Ryzen a good fit for thin mid-range laptops.

In comparison to the faster Ryzen 3000 CPUs, the 3200U is not using the newer Zen+ microarchitecture and is still manufactured in 14nm. Compared to the old Ryzen 3 2200U, the 3200U therefore only offers a 100 MHz higher clock speed.

The Ryzen 3 is compatible with single-channel or dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM.

Please go to our Raven Ridge launch article for details on the architecture and more.

Performance

The average 3200U in our extensive database is anything but a performance monster, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-8130U and the Pentium N6000. While not as atrociously slow as most N-series and J-series Intel chips, this specific Ryzen is good enough for basic day-to-day activities only.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 3 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W; most will go for a higher value to extract more performance out of it. Either way, an active cooling solution will be needed to dissipate the heat.

The R3 3200U is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 2700AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+Picasso-U (Zen)
Series: Ryzen 7 Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X compare3.7 - 4.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 « 3.2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock3200 - 4100 MHz2600 - 3500 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 162 / 4
TDP65 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4940 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm
Die Size213 mm2
SocketAM4 (1331)FP5
FeaturesSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
Architecturex86x86
$299 U.S.
Announced
L1 Cache192 KB
max. Temp.105 °C
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3200U
23.5 pt (33%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1767     avg: 1786     median: 1786 (2%)     max: 1804 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 208     avg: 584     median: 765 (33%)     max: 780 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 274     avg: 298.2     median: 301 (33%)     max: 318 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 453     avg: 607     median: 690 (2%)     max: 727 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1551 Points (10%)
min: 318     avg: 335     median: 334 (2%)     max: 353 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
161 Points (48%)
min: 126     avg: 128.3     median: 129 (39%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 2700 +
16.7 Points (22%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 2700 +
1.8 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4505 Points (27%)
4258 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31385 Points (23%)
9284 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
49441 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
7756 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
130.5 s (2%)
483.5 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.1 s (1%)
14 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4440 Points (7%)
1613 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 8785     avg: 9083     median: 9081.5 (5%)     max: 9382 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3333     avg: 3371     median: 3372 (40%)     max: 3406 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
89.7 fps (31%)
19.5 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
195.7 fps (45%)
97.8 fps (23%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.5 fps (17%)
min: 1.864     avg: 2     median: 2 (3%)     max: 2.03 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9 GB/s (23%)
2.2 GB/s (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
308.3 Seconds (2%)
min: 1439     avg: 1484     median: 1485 (10%)     max: 1528 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.846     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 0.852 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9475 Points (20%)
3755 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.1 s (2%)
12.5 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.1 s (1%)
29 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
597 s (3%)
730 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 R7 2700 +
51796 Points (45%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
13959 Points (38%)
min: 3653     avg: 3758     median: 3772 (10%)     max: 3835 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
64158 Points (52%)
min: 40774     avg: 42358     median: 41370 (34%)     max: 45919 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
64932 Points (53%)
min: 39108     avg: 41332     median: 41308 (34%)     max: 43602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
66419 Points (56%)
min: 44389     avg: 48213     median: 48111 (41%)     max: 52242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
12224 Points (31%)
min: 3321     avg: 3335     median: 3329 (8%)     max: 3362 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
17915 Points (32%)
min: 4743     avg: 4930     median: 4867 (9%)     max: 5241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8049 Points (34%)
min: 1509     avg: 1536     median: 1541 (6%)     max: 1553 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1000 Points (42%)
min: 770     avg: 803     median: 796.5 (34%)     max: 847 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6560 Points (12%)
min: 1604     avg: 1661     median: 1651.5 (3%)     max: 1736 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 823     avg: 827     median: 826.5 (4%)     max: 830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1529     avg: 1649     median: 1649 (5%)     max: 1769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4681 Points (47%)
min: 3366     avg: 3562     median: 3562 (36%)     max: 3758 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
22776 Points (25%)
min: 6553     avg: 7143     median: 7143 (8%)     max: 7733 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3626 Points (49%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7237 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6922 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3282 Points (64%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7496 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3673 Points (55%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
7535 Points (61%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5586 Points (51%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9447 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7540 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7816 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1185     avg: 1243     median: 1205.5 (1%)     max: 1374 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
130.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
23991 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 137     avg: 142.3     median: 139 (29%)     max: 154 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
140.9 Watt (24%)
17.2 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
143.2 Watt (26%)
19.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 R7 2700 +
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3200U → 54% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 03. 12:43:29

#0 checking url part for id 10030 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11191 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10030 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#7 got single benchmarks 10030 +0.01s ... 0.042s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11191 +0.018s ... 0.06s

#9 got single benchmarks 11191 +0.031s ... 0.091s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.091s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.282s ... 0.373s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.395s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)