Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 250 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 236V

AMD Ryzen 7 250

► remove from comparison AMD R7 250

The AMD Ryzen 7 250 is a powerful laptop processor (APU) of the now years-old Hawk Point family that was announced at CES 2025. This isn't an entirely new APU; instead, the R7 250 is a rebadged R7 8840U. Its eight Zen 4 cores run at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. The Radeon 780M iGPU is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 7 250 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the chip has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM while also being compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interface).

Performance

Since the R7 250 is an 8840U / 7840U in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be about as fast as the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V in multi-thread workloads. Therefore, the CPU performance is good enough even for demanding tasks, as of 2025.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. As for gaming, most 2024 games run fine at 1080p with settings set to Low on this graphics adapter.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value significantly, with values as low as 15 W and as high as 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The R7 250 is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 5 236V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 5 236V

The Intel Core Ultra 5 236V is a mid-range Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It features 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.5 GHz and 4.7 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 130V iGPU and 16 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 40 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well. A vPro-enabled version of the CPU became available in early 2025.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 5 238V is the amount of on-package, non-upgradeable RAM: 16 GB vs 32 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 236V's level 3 cache is pretty small as compared to more expensive Ultra 7 2xxV and Ultra 9 2xxV chips at 8 MB vs 12 MB. Elsewhere, the 236V has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 40 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

Based on Geekbench 6.3 Multi test results available online in early Nov 2024, the 236V (and the 238V) delivers around 10,100 points, putting it on equal footing with chips such as AMD's Ryzen 7 7735HS and Apple's M2 which is an OK result for a thin-and-light laptop in late 2024.

Generally speaking, the 226V, 228V, 236V and 238V are slower than the 256V, 258V, 266V, 268V, 288V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 130V has 7 Xe² architecture "cores" running at up to 1,850 MHz, as well as 7 ray tracing units at its disposal. This is a direct successor to the Arc 7 iGPU; it is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

Its performance can be vastly different depending on which benchmarks and games one runs. Oftentimes, it isn't much faster than its direct predecessor, the Arc 7. It is clear the 130V isn't fast enough to run most triple-A 2024 games at 1080p. However, it's still more than good enough for an occasional gaming session.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 250Intel Core Ultra 5 236V
CodenameHawk Point-U (Zen 4)Lunar Lake
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Lunar Lake
Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake
AMD Ryzen 7 250 « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250 compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 230 compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230 compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V compare2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V compare2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V « 2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz2100 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB1.4 MB
L2 Cache8 MB14 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 8
4 x 4.7 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP28 Watt17 Watt
Technology4 nm3 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP8BGA2833
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3LPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (40 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 130V ( - 1850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
TDP Turbo PL237 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 250
38.9 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
104 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
846 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 12275     avg: 14088     median: 13835 (13%)     max: 16154 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 1649     avg: 1693     median: 1692 (71%)     max: 1737 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 655     avg: 676     median: 678 (74%)     max: 694 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 4901     avg: 5552     median: 5436 (13%)     max: 6320 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 2002     avg: 2250     median: 2204 (14%)     max: 2544 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 263     avg: 270.3     median: 269 (75%)     max: 279 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 250 +
29.8 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 250 +
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 R7 250 +
7457 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 R7 250 +
42932 Points (31%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 R7 250 +
6595 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 57662     avg: 59804     median: 58274 (33%)     max: 63475 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 6163     avg: 6310     median: 6281 (74%)     max: 6485 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 R7 250 +
143.1 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 R7 250 +
268.8 fps (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 15     avg: 16.3     median: 15.9 (28%)     max: 18.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 R7 250 +
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 R7 250 +
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 R7 250 +
11.1 GB/s (29%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 328     avg: 369.3     median: 371 (5%)     max: 409 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 204     avg: 228     median: 231 (2%)     max: 249 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 0.4471     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.502 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 R7 250 +
15033 Points (32%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 R7 250 +
7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 R7 250 +
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 R7 250 +
652 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 R7 250 +
74623 Points (57%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 R7 250 +
18295 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 R7 250 +
85107 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 R7 250 +
16219 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 R7 250 +
23655 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 R7 250 +
9257 Points (39%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2499     avg: 2569     median: 2586 (65%)     max: 2623 Points
min: 2442     avg: 2551     median: 2551 (64%)     max: 2660 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9956     avg: 10428     median: 10123 (39%)     max: 11206 Points
min: 9498     avg: 9774     median: 9773.5 (38%)     max: 10049 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 1861     avg: 1902     median: 1911 (75%)     max: 1934 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 9458     avg: 9843     median: 9720 (17%)     max: 10350 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
7772 Points (86%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
40469 Points (53%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 534     avg: 561     median: 558 (1%)     max: 591 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 232     avg: 235     median: 235 (65%)     max: 238 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 R7 250 +
281 Points (50%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 1556     avg: 1628     median: 1581 (59%)     max: 1746 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 39.9     avg: 58     median: 58 (10%)     max: 76 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 6.34     avg: 12.4     median: 12.4 (8%)     max: 18.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 6.1     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (15%)     max: 21.3 Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 250 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 236V → 98% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 18. 15:43:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 19148 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18009 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755524631s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 19148 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#8 got single benchmarks 19148 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18009 +0.001s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 18009 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.047s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.049s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)