Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver N6000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

Intel Pentium Silver N6000

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N6000

The Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 3.3 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N6000 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process, the same process as Ice Lake.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the four CPU cores, the SoC integrates a 32 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 850 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4x memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N6000 in our database proves to be an OK entry-level processor, as of late 2022, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U. Yes, the chip is a whole lot slower than the latest Ryzen 3 and Core i3 processors, but it will at least let you run your day-to-day apps without annoying slowdowns.

The Asus Vivobook 13 Slate is among the fastest systems built around the N6000 that we know of, thanks to the long-term CPU power limit of 10 W. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

Like nearly all other N-class Intel processors, the Pentium N6000 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as the long-term power limit). This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The SoC is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 665

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (SM6125) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver N6000Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
CodenameJasper LakeKryo 260
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 « 1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 1 compare1.8 - 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock1100 - 3300 MHz2200 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
TDP6 Watt
Technology10 nm11 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3 x 8, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAAdreno 610 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 686 DSP, Specra 165 ISP
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (350 - 850 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 610
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N6000
21 pt (35%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 665
0.5 pt (38%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915
max:
1.3 164%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1610     avg: 1730     median: 1699 (2%)     max: 1911 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 653     avg: 669     median: 672.5 (28%)     max: 679 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 237     avg: 253.8     median: 255 (28%)     max: 268 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 595     avg: 657     median: 650.5 (2%)     max: 730 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 266     avg: 292.5     median: 291 (2%)     max: 322 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 109     avg: 114.3     median: 113.7 (31%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3.47     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (5%)     max: 3.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.36     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (33%)     max: 1.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4057     avg: 4132     median: 4131.5 (25%)     max: 4206 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 9343     avg: 9643     median: 9642.5 (7%)     max: 9942 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
727 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16.9 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1330 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 8096     avg: 8953     median: 9212 (5%)     max: 9668 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2320     avg: 2934     median: 3305 (39%)     max: 3387 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
18.4 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
93.4 fps (2%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.55     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.76 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.8 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
3786 Seconds (48%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1738     avg: 2163     median: 1935 (14%)     max: 3157 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.084     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.278 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3985 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.5 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
895 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3134     avg: 3617     median: 3563 (9%)     max: 4155 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 30345     avg: 32921     median: 32921 (27%)     max: 35497 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 30120     avg: 32790     median: 32790 (27%)     max: 35460 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 38897     avg: 43994     median: 43993.5 (35%)     max: 49090 Points
min: 17865     avg: 20749     median: 20024 (16%)     max: 24652 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2524     avg: 2897     median: 2947 (7%)     max: 3220 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3838     avg: 4315     median: 4063 (7%)     max: 5296 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1161     avg: 1301     median: 1259.5 (5%)     max: 1523 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 2154     avg: 2377     median: 2379 (22%)     max: 2541 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 2199     avg: 2369     median: 2370.5 (27%)     max: 2503 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
569 Points (14%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
1376 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 720     avg: 728     median: 727 (28%)     max: 736 Points
min: 309     avg: 311     median: 310.5 (12%)     max: 314 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1784     avg: 1912     median: 1915 (3%)     max: 2004 Points
min: 1256     avg: 1356     median: 1371.5 (2%)     max: 1421 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 723     avg: 725     median: 724.5 (3%)     max: 726 Points
min: 313     avg: 314     median: 314 (1%)     max: 315 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1881     avg: 1912     median: 1911.5 (6%)     max: 1942 Points
min: 1327     avg: 1366     median: 1379 (4%)     max: 1392 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3188 Points (32%)
min: 1495     avg: 1509     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1536 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8341 Points (8%)
min: 5134     avg: 5388     median: 5366 (5%)     max: 5663 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 665 +
2272 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 665 +
2767 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 665 +
10733 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 665 +
4516 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
6117 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1388     avg: 1412     median: 1405 (2%)     max: 1451 ms
min: 4434     avg: 4783     median: 4562 (5%)     max: 6719 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
293.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25840     avg: 32251     median: 34145.5 (25%)     max: 34874 Points
min: 6133     avg: 8901     median: 9260 (7%)     max: 9671 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
104.2 Points (29%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 138.4     avg: 143.8     median: 146 (26%)     max: 147 Points
min: 38     avg: 50.9     median: 51 (9%)     max: 58 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
108166 Points (37%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 SD 665 +
10308 Points (32%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 SD 665 +
35460 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
31064 Points (10%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
63801 Points (39%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
140633 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 26864     avg: 32727     median: 31707 (27%)     max: 45742 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 27018     avg: 36247     median: 37857 (31%)     max: 44461 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 32489     avg: 33693     median: 33527 (6%)     max: 34855 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 62570     avg: 68985     median: 70133 (25%)     max: 71112 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 167305     avg: 171951     median: 169695 (16%)     max: 181432 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 665 +
172978 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
13.4 MB/s (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
151 MB/s (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
11.3 MB/s (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
256 MB/s (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 665 +
7618 Points (3%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 665 +
6505 Points (24%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 3249     avg: 3328     median: 3328 (18%)     max: 3407 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 9865     avg: 10707     median: 10707 (23%)     max: 11549 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 6189     avg: 6985     median: 6560.5 (43%)     max: 11432 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 7437     avg: 8163     median: 8085 (40%)     max: 9051 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 440     avg: 469     median: 469 (18%)     max: 498 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.3     avg: 12     median: 12 (2%)     max: 12.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.5     avg: 13.3     median: 12.9 (2%)     max: 16.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 665 +
3.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.37     avg: 5.4     median: 4.8 (6%)     max: 8.08 Watt
415%
1 SD 665 +
1.2 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 19.6     avg: 22.3     median: 20.6 (15%)     max: 26.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N6000 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 → 48% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 02. 12:23:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13075 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11487 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759400637s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 Oct 2025 05:17:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13075 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 13075 +0.01s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11487 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 11487 +0.012s ... 0.034s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.072s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.075s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)