Notebookcheck Logo

AMD PRO A12-9800B vs Intel Core i3-7130U

AMD PRO A12-9800B

► remove from comparison AMD PRO A12-9800B

The AMD PRO A12-9800B is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. It is the business version of the AMD FX-9800P and features the same specifications. The PRO A12-9800B is (together with the FX-9800P) the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 15-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-Watt A12-8800B / FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The ULV chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the A12-9800B is slightly ahead of the old 15-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with a Intel Core i3-6100U (Skylake, 15 Watts). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9800B with 12-15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the APU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

Intel Core i3-7130U

► remove from comparison Intel i3-7130U

The Intel Core i3-7130U is a dual-core processor of the Kaby-Lake architecture. It offers two CPU cores clocked at 2.7 GHz (without Turbo Boost) and integrates HyperThreading to work with up to 4 threads at once. The architectural differences are rather small compared to the Skylake generation, therefore the performance per MHz should be very similar. The SoC includes a dual channel DDR4 memory controller and Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics adapter (clocked at 300 MHz to 1,000 MHz). It is manufactured on improved 14 nm Intel process with FinFETs.

Performance

The average 7130U in our database only just matches the Core i5-4310U, a dual-core CPU of similar energy efficiency that launched in 2014, in multi-thread performance. While not as horribly slow as most N-class Intel chips, this Core i3 is unlikely to make a power user happy.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is, and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

This Core i3 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are allowed to significantly reduce that value (7.5 W being the lower limit) resulting in lower clock speeds and lower performance.

Last but not the least, the i3-7130U is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for subpar, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD PRO A12-9800BIntel Core i3-7130U
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameBristol RidgeKaby Lake-U
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-9830P compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B « 2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock2700 - 3600 MHz2700 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors3100 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
SocketFP4BGA1356
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866/DDR4-2133 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
L3 Cache3 MB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 222     avg: 225.3     median: 225 (1%)     max: 229 Points
284 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 75     avg: 75.7     median: 75 (23%)     max: 77 Points
111 Points (33%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.47     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.7 Points
3.1 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.86     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (22%)     max: 0.9 Points
1.3 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2564     avg: 2593     median: 2592.5 (16%)     max: 2621 Points
4338 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6854     avg: 7056     median: 7055.5 (5%)     max: 7257 Points
9828 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
10237 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3499 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
475.7 s (6%)
568 s (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
13.8 s (3%)
18 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1383 Points (2%)
2250 Points (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
16.5 fps (6%)
19 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
77 fps (18%)
100.2 fps (23%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (5%)
1.7 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3249 Points (7%)
3823 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.6 s (4%)
14.1 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.1 s (2%)
47.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
908 s (4%)
744 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2232     avg: 2318     median: 2275 (6%)     max: 2448 Points
3932 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 24353     avg: 25657     median: 25657 (21%)     max: 26961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 25150     avg: 25871     median: 25871 (21%)     max: 26592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 27021     avg: 27778     median: 27778 (23%)     max: 28535 Points
36137 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1989     avg: 2038     median: 2035 (5%)     max: 2089 Points
3090 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2739     avg: 2999     median: 3007 (5%)     max: 3251 Points
4360 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 437     avg: 439     median: 439 (2%)     max: 441 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3497 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6792 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2073 Points (28%)
3473 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4453 Points (11%)
6782 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5326 Points (9%)
6047 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2031 Points (40%)
2829 Points (55%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5575 Points (9%)
6279 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2109 Points (32%)
2972 Points (45%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3270 Points (26%)
8776 Points (71%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2974 Points (27%)
7335 Points (67%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
7151 Points (14%)
6043 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6518 Points (13%)
5967 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
5705 Points (15%)
6548 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2152     avg: 2225     median: 2159 (3%)     max: 2363 ms
1682 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
170.4 ms (2%)
117.7 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 16552     avg: 17731     median: 18206 (16%)     max: 18435 Points
21368 Points (19%)

Average Benchmarks AMD PRO A12-9800B → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-7130U → 130% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 11. 03:37:41

#0 checking url part for id 8544 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9178 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 May 2024 05:37:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.045s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8544 +0.003s ... 0.048s

#7 got single benchmarks 8544 +0.017s ... 0.065s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9178 +0.004s ... 0.068s

#9 got single benchmarks 9178 +0.024s ... 0.092s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.092s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.357s ... 0.449s

#12 return log +0.039s ... 0.488s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)