Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6400

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.1 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. It is based on the 45nm Penryn core, but Trusted Execution and Virtualization (VT-x) are disabled.

The P7450 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

Intel Core 2 Duo T6400

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 is an entry level dual core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock speed of 2 GHz. The performance should be sufficient for office and other casual tasks but high level gaming and HD video editing for example could be limited by the CPU performance.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7450Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2130 MHz2000 MHz
FSB1066800
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million
Technology45 nm1.05-1.15V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478PGA478
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), IDA (Intel Dynamic Acceleration)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7450Intel Core 2 Duo T6400

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2242     avg: 2389     median: 2305.5 (21%)     max: 2575 Points
min: 2082     avg: 2115     median: 2115 (19%)     max: 2154 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4121     avg: 4473     median: 4373 (6%)     max: 4863 Points
min: 3704     avg: 3963     median: 4005 (5%)     max: 4078 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1230     avg: 1237     median: 1239 (15%)     max: 1243 s
1249 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 35.9     avg: 38     median: 38.6 (8%)     max: 39 s
39.4 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1845     avg: 1896     median: 1900 (4%)     max: 1938 Points
min: 1711     avg: 1764     median: 1767.5 (4%)     max: 1819 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 23.5     median: 23.9 (5%)     max: 25 s
min: 26     avg: 28.8     median: 26.5 (6%)     max: 34 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 55.7     median: 55.4 (2%)     max: 59.6 s
min: 61     avg: 64     median: 64 (3%)     max: 67 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1334     avg: 1338     median: 1337.5 (6%)     max: 1341 s
min: 1368     avg: 1532     median: 1531.5 (7%)     max: 1695 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 16477     avg: 18533     median: 19560 (9%)     max: 19563 MIPS
min: 18396     avg: 18438     median: 18437.5 (9%)     max: 18479 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 14460     avg: 14811     median: 14700 (11%)     max: 15272 MFLOPS
min: 14630     avg: 14670     median: 14670 (11%)     max: 14710 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4809     avg: 5158     median: 5055 (32%)     max: 5712 Points
min: 4479     avg: 5038     median: 4916 (31%)     max: 6001 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.1 Points (73%)
4.9 Points (70%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P7450 +
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3804     avg: 3918     median: 3918 (4%)     max: 4032 Points
3909 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 → 97% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 10. 08:11:40

#0 checking url part for id 445 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 454 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 445 +0s ... 0.008s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.009s

#47 got single benchmarks 445 +0.022s ... 0.031s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 454 +0s ... 0.031s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.032s

#50 got single benchmarks 454 +0.025s ... 0.057s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.058s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#133 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#135 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#144 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#146 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.068s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.025s ... 0.093s

#148 return log +0.004s ... 0.097s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)