Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium N3700 vs Intel Celeron N4020

Intel Pentium N3700

► remove from comparison Intel N3700

The Intel Pentium N3700 is a quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks, which has been presented in early 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.4 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Pentium N3520). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to its predecessor Pentium N3520 (2.17 - 2.42 GHz) or the AMD APU A4-6210, the N3700 offers an almost identical performance. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet browsing or office applications, but may struggle in more demanding software.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 16 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 700 MHz, the GPU is about twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle demanding 3D games of 2015. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N4020

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4020

The Intel Celeron N4020 is a slow dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in laptops and mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.8 GHz, the latter being a moderate 200 MHz upgrade over the preceding N4000 chip. Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and an integrated UHD 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, the N4020 is manufactured on a really old, as of late 2023, 14 nm process. What makes the newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, a reduction in physical size.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is not much different from what was used in Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A relatively large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of N4020's strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to processors of previous generations. Still, Gemini Lake refresh processors are a clear step down from Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

The N4020 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few N4020-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s, though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight to the motherboard for good (BGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

While slightly faster than the outgoing Celeron N4000, the average N4020 in our extensive database only just manages to match the N6211, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. These three chips deliver multi-thread CB R15, CB R20 and CB R23 scores that are so low, they lag behind a single-thread score of any half-decent CPU such as an i5-1135G7. In other words, these Celeron N chips are good enough for basic tasks only such as word processing and Web browsing with two or three tabs open at a time.

The Celeron N4120, a quad-core chip with a similar name, has little trouble leaving the N4020 behind in most workloads - which is not to say it is a fast CPU.

Jacking the long-term power limit value up to something like 9 W will help improve system responsiveness noticeably.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like the  HD Graphics 520 or the UHD Graphics 615 or other widespread Intel iGPUs found in Core i3/i5/i7/i9 processors of generations six to ten.

Just like the HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 is DX12 compatible. The iGPU's 12 EUs can run at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about as far as its talents go.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution can drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9-encoded videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a limit on video resolutions that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power consumption

The low 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) makes it easy for laptop makers to ditch the fan. Performance sustainability will be poor unless the long-term Power Limit is set to a value higher than the default 6 W and a fan is available to aid in heat dissipation.

The Celeron N4020 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Pentium N3700Intel Celeron N4020
CodenameBraswellGemini Lake refresh
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake refresh
Intel Pentium N3710 compare1.6 - 2.56 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium N3700 « 1.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1600 - 2400 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP6 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.90 °C
SocketFCBGA1170BGA1090
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 400 - 700 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Braswell) (400 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$161 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
TDP Turbo PL215 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4020
15.6 pt (26%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
616 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
308 Points (13%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 149.8     avg: 162.4     median: 162.4 (18%)     max: 175 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 242     avg: 279     median: 279 (1%)     max: 316 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 132     avg: 138.4     median: 141 (1%)     max: 143 Points
min: 110.1     avg: 127.1     median: 127.1 (1%)     max: 144.1 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 36     avg: 37.4     median: 37 (10%)     max: 39 Points
min: 68.6     avg: 73.8     median: 73.8 (20%)     max: 78.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.61     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (2%)     max: 1.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.38     avg: 0.4     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.47 Points
0.9 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1087     avg: 1175     median: 1200 (7%)     max: 1267 Points
2184 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3054     avg: 3610     median: 3148 (2%)     max: 4411 Points
4427 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N3700 +
1554 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
720 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
23.1 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1030 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
4498 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2456 MIPS (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
49.7 fps (11%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 0.73     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.92 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.9 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4064 Seconds (29%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.5 sec (33%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1934     avg: 2175     median: 2174.5 (5%)     max: 2415 Points
2495 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
76 s (16%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
153 s (7%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2896 s (13%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N3700 +
4950 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1463     avg: 1707     median: 1768 (4%)     max: 1809 Points
min: 1560     avg: 1650     median: 1650 (4%)     max: 1740 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N3700 +
min: 15199     avg: 17365     median: 18405 (15%)     max: 18490 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N3700 +
13625 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N3700 +
15829 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1436     avg: 1557     median: 1611 (4%)     max: 1623 Points
1286 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2093     avg: 2237     median: 2303 (4%)     max: 2315 Points
min: 1852     avg: 1853     median: 1853 (3%)     max: 1854 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
476 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 319     avg: 418.7     median: 462 (18%)     max: 475 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 663     avg: 786     median: 836 (1%)     max: 858 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1989     avg: 2004     median: 2004 (20%)     max: 2019 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3404     avg: 3433     median: 3433 (3%)     max: 3462 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3700 +
min: 3209     avg: 3211     median: 3210.5 (6%)     max: 3212 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3700 +
min: 952     avg: 956     median: 956 (12%)     max: 960 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3700 +
3299 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3700 +
1003 Points (15%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
4378 ms (5%)
min: 2300     avg: 2488     median: 2488 (3%)     max: 2676 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N3700 +
min: 343.6     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (4%)     max: 359.3 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N3700 +
8665 Points (6%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 49.4     avg: 55.3     median: 55.3 (15%)     max: 61.1 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 76.2     avg: 80.2     median: 80.2 (14%)     max: 84.2 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
310 Points (12%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.9 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
14.3 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium N3700 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4020 → 135% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 08. 07:51:04

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6779 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11535 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754632263s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Aug 2025 05:18:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6779 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 6779 +0.009s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11535 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 11535 +0.006s ... 0.027s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.064s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.066s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)