Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N3050 vs Intel Celeron N2830

Intel Celeron N3050

► remove from comparison Intel N3050

The Intel Celeron N3050 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to its predecessor Celeron N2815 (1.86 - 2.13 GHz), the N3050 offers an almost identical performance. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light Internet browsing or office applications, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N2830

► remove from comparison Intel N2830

The Intel Celeron N2830 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2830 supports Intel Quick Sync and Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2830 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Therefore, the N2830 even competes with older dual core CPUs like the Core 2 Duo SU9400. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 750 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N3050Intel Celeron N2830
CodenameBraswellBay Trail-M
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3060 compare1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3050 « 1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3000 compare1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2830 « 2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1600 - 2160 MHz2160 - 2410 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP6 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology14 nm22 nm
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, Speedstep
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 600 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache112 KB

Benchmarks

min: 0.79     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.87 Points
min: 0.4     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.45 Points
min: 1088     avg: 1178     median: 1184.5 (7%)     max: 1241 Points
min: 2145     avg: 2253     median: 2239.5 (2%)     max: 2356 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 2935     avg: 2943     median: 2943 (2%)     max: 2951 Points
3340 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1568     avg: 1573     median: 1572.5 (2%)     max: 1577 Points
1783 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 1740     avg: 1757     median: 1757 (21%)     max: 1773 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 52     avg: 54.4     median: 55.2 (11%)     max: 56.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 514     avg: 548     median: 529 (1%)     max: 619 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 4.7     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (0%)     max: 4.77 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 22.98     avg: 24.8     median: 25.5 (1%)     max: 25.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 0.04     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.059 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 0.063     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0939 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 0.337     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.427 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 943     avg: 1150     median: 1243 (3%)     max: 1263 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 22     avg: 32.6     median: 33.6 (7%)     max: 41.3 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 61     avg: 82     median: 88 (4%)     max: 91.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 1566     avg: 1829     median: 1896.5 (8%)     max: 1956 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N3050 +
2247 Points (2%)
min: 970     avg: 1018     median: 1027 (3%)     max: 1052 Points
min: 10142     avg: 10740     median: 10610 (9%)     max: 11180 Points
min: 812     avg: 846     median: 850 (2%)     max: 877 Points
min: 1557     avg: 1569     median: 1565 (3%)     max: 1589 Points
min: 891     avg: 908     median: 909 (12%)     max: 928 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 1594     avg: 1616     median: 1615.5 (3%)     max: 1637 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 895     avg: 905     median: 904.5 (14%)     max: 914 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N3050 +
2477 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N3050 +
2241 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N3050 +
2168 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N3050 +
2115 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N3050 +
2194 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4926     avg: 5391     median: 5082.5 (6%)     max: 7633 ms
min: 4141     avg: 4944     median: 4482 (5%)     max: 6996 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 378.8     avg: 407.1     median: 406.4 (4%)     max: 444.5 ms
min: 319     avg: 432.7     median: 375 (4%)     max: 592 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4059     avg: 6704     median: 7291 (5%)     max: 7545 Points
min: 4542     avg: 6715     median: 7211 (5%)     max: 7397 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3050 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2830 → 109% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 26. 11:51:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6781 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5684 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1758880310s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Sep 2025 05:17:37 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6781 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 6781 +0.017s ... 0.024s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5684 +0.001s ... 0.025s

#10 got single benchmarks 5684 +0.009s ... 0.034s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.061s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.063s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)