Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N100 vs Intel Core i3-N300

Intel Processor N100

► remove from comparison Intel N100

The Intel Processor N100 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with 1 to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

The average N100 in our database delivers unimpressive multi-thread benchmark scores that are most similar to those of the Core i3-1115G4. The chip is fast enough for many day-to-day tasks, but not much more than that; the other thing to keep in mind is that of the two N100-toting systems tested by us as of October 2023, both have rather high CPU power limits. The chip will be noticeably slower if limited to just six or seven Watts.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N100 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Core i3-N300

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N300

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz (single core, 3 GHz all core Turbo). The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance depends on the cooling and TDP settings and should be somewhere similar to the old  Alder Lake Pentium 8500 (1 performance core, 4 efficiency cores, max. 4.4 GHz and 8 MB L3-cache). The multi-threaded performance should be quite good with the 8 cores but will suffer due to the low TDP. Single thread performance will suffer due to the missing P-cores and relatively low boost clock speeds.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 7 W and is therefore even suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Processor N100Intel Core i3-N300
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
CodenameAlder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 « 1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 « - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3400 MHz <=3800 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP6 Watt7 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$128 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N100
26.3 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N300
20 pt (28%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
100%
N100 +
min: 60     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (42%)     max: 61 Points
34 Points (24%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
100%
N100 +
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (4%)     max: 196 Points
165 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
N100 +
min: 2038     avg: 2730     median: 2949.5 (3%)     max: 2983 Points
2546 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
N100 +
min: 868     avg: 918     median: 930 (40%)     max: 942 Points
513 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N100 +
min: 331     avg: 349.8     median: 355 (39%)     max: 358 Points
195 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N100 +
min: 776     avg: 1042     median: 1126.5 (3%)     max: 1139 Points
968 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 296     avg: 429.8     median: 472 (3%)     max: 479 Points
416 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 137     avg: 149.5     median: 153 (46%)     max: 155 Points
85 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 3.91     avg: 5     median: 5.2 (7%)     max: 5.99 Points
5.3 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 1.55     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (46%)     max: 1.87 Points
1 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N100 +
min: 4604     avg: 4884     median: 4869 (29%)     max: 5179 Points
2884 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N100 +
min: 9608     avg: 13384     median: 15207 (11%)     max: 15336 Points
12014 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
N100 +
min: 14514     avg: 20884     median: 23912 (17%)     max: 24225 Points
18450 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
N100 +
min: 7171     avg: 7832     median: 8098 (10%)     max: 8227 Points
4497 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N100 +
min: 481.652     avg: 536     median: 496.8 (6%)     max: 630.2 s
531 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N100 +
min: 15.795     avg: 16.5     median: 15.9 (3%)     max: 17.7 s
17.5 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N100 +
min: 2187     avg: 2330     median: 2372 (4%)     max: 2431 Points
1915 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
N100 +
min: 9272     avg: 12249     median: 13216 (8%)     max: 13291 MIPS
11976 MIPS (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N100 +
min: 3449     avg: 3738     median: 3771.5 (45%)     max: 3958 MIPS
2403 MIPS (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N100 +
min: 21.8     avg: 30.1     median: 33.9 (12%)     max: 34.7 fps
28.9 fps (10%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N100 +
min: 105.35     avg: 150.3     median: 172.6 (40%)     max: 173 fps
106.6 fps (25%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N100 +
min: 1.99     avg: 3.1     median: 3.4 (6%)     max: 3.49 fps
3.2 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N100 +
min: 0.257     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (0%)     max: 0.262 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N100 +
min: 0.531     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.538 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N100 +
min: 2.8     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (8%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
2.6 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
N100 +
min: 1992     avg: 2024     median: 2028 (26%)     max: 2052 Seconds
2147 Seconds (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N100 +
min: 1017     avg: 1174     median: 1043 (7%)     max: 1594 Seconds
1095 Seconds (8%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N100 +
min: 0.822     avg: 0.9     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 1.039 sec
1.3 sec (29%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N100 +
min: 4091     avg: 5656     median: 6435 (14%)     max: 6441 Points
4261 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N100 +
min: 19.264     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.531 s
33.2 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N100 +
min: 40.352     avg: 40.5     median: 40.4 (2%)     max: 40.601 s
69.1 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N100 +
min: 818.372     avg: 833     median: 818.8 (4%)     max: 862.019 s
1381 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
N100 +
min: 9434     avg: 13518     median: 15496 (14%)     max: 15625 Points
15263 Points (13%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 3814     avg: 5623     median: 6095.5 (16%)     max: 6486 Points
4983 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 34828     avg: 45164     median: 49600 (40%)     max: 51063 Points
28114 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 34083     avg: 44999     median: 49495 (40%)     max: 51420 Points
28073 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 50867     avg: 52113     median: 52098 (44%)     max: 53373 Points
28903 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 3203     avg: 4282     median: 4615 (12%)     max: 4693 Points
4049 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 4589     avg: 6060     median: 6523.5 (12%)     max: 6602 Points
5528 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1407     avg: 2230     median: 2499 (11%)     max: 2516 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 1070     avg: 1194     median: 1229.5 (37%)     max: 1245 Points
762 Points (23%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 2347     avg: 3012     median: 3208.5 (13%)     max: 3282 Points
2803 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 946     avg: 992     median: 998 (42%)     max: 1018 Points
626 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 2038     avg: 2692     median: 2864 (5%)     max: 2896 Points
2674 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 982     avg: 994     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1008 Points
616 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 2424     avg: 2680     median: 2753 (9%)     max: 2862 Points
2642 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 4390     avg: 4458     median: 4467 (45%)     max: 4518 Points
2913 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 10938     avg: 11133     median: 11197 (12%)     max: 11264 Points
9894 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N100 +
min: 1004     avg: 1035     median: 1021.5 (1%)     max: 1093 ms
1638 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N100 +
136.2 Points (39%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N100 +
min: 157.3     avg: 175.6     median: 178.9 (37%)     max: 187.4 Points
104.3 Points (22%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
N100 +
min: 735     avg: 786     median: 785 (30%)     max: 839 Points
529 Points (20%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.2     avg: 24     median: 27.3 (5%)     max: 29.1 Watt
101%
1 i3-N300 +
24.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.4     avg: 21.8     median: 24.3 (4%)     max: 26.1 Watt
100%
1 i3-N300 +
22.2 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 5.33     avg: 8.1     median: 8.6 (6%)     max: 9.98 Watt
14.7 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 N100 +
min: 18.3     avg: 18.7     median: 18.7 (14%)     max: 19.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N100 → 100% n=50

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N300 → 79% n=50

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 19:48:18

#0 checking url part for id 14932 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14928 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.019s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14932 +0.016s ... 0.035s

#7 got single benchmarks 14932 +0.021s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14928 +0.016s ... 0.071s

#9 got single benchmarks 14928 +0.01s ... 0.081s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.081s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.266s ... 0.347s

#12 return log +0.021s ... 0.368s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)