ARM Mali-T720 vs ARM Mali-T760 MP6 vs ARM Mali-T760 MP2

ARM Mali-T720

► remove ARM Mali-T720

The ARM Mali-T720 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs. The chip is available since 2014. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11 FL9_3. According to ARM, the Mali-T720 can be scaled from 1 - 8 cores/clusters (MP1, MP2, ... MP) and clocks up to 650 MHz.

Sometimes the SoC does not specifies the number of cores, therefore this generic page / GPU for the single cluster variant is used and the benchmarks may differ. See e.g. the Mali-T720 MP2 and T720 MP4 pages for comparison.

The MP1 variant is only as fast as the older Mali-400 MP4 graphics card and therefore only suited for low demanding 3D games (Android based). However, the power consumption on the other hand is rather low and therefore the GPU is also suited for small smartphones.

ARM Mali-T760 MP6

► remove ARM Mali-T760 MP6

The ARM Mali-T760 MP6 is a mobile graphics solution for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2015 and for example integrated in the Exynos 5433 Octa SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 - 16 cores/clusters.

The MP6 version offers 6 clusters clocked at up to 700 MHz (143 GFLOPS). According to first benchmarks, the performance is similar to the Adreno 420 and PowerVR GX6450. Therfore, even very demanding games of 2014 should run in high resolutions fluently.

ARM Mali-T760 MP2

► remove ARM Mali-T760 MP2

The ARM Mali-T760 MP2 is a mobile graphics solution for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2015 and for example integrated in the MediaTek MT6752 SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 - 16 cores/clusters.

The MP2 version offers 2 clusters clocked at up to 700 MHz (48 GFLOPS). Therefore, it only offers one third of the theoretical performance of the T760MP6 version. The gaming performance should be similar to the Adreno 405 or PowerVR G6200. Therefore, it is situated in the middle class in 2014 and all games of that year should run fluently.

Due to the only 2 cores, the GPU is also suited for small tablets and smartphones.

ARM Mali-T720ARM Mali-T760 MP6ARM Mali-T760 MP2
ManufacturerARMARMARM
Mali-T700 Series
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 700 - 772 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T760 MP6 6 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T760 MP4 4 @ 600 MHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T720 MP4 4 @ 600 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T720 MP2 2 @ 650 MHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 600 MHz
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 700 - 772 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T760 MP6 6 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T760 MP4 4 @ 600 MHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T720 MP4 4 @ 600 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T720 MP2 2 @ 650 MHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 600 MHz
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 700 - 772 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T760 MP6 6 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T760 MP4 4 @ 600 MHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T720 MP4 4 @ 600 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T720 MP2 2 @ 650 MHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 600 MHz
CodenameMidgard (3rd Generation)Midgard (3rd Generation)Midgard (3rd Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (3rd-gen)Midgard (3rd-gen)Midgard (3rd-gen)
1 - 6 - 2 -
Core600 MHz700 MHz700 MHz
nonono
DirectXDirectX 9.3DirectX 11DirectX 11.1
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11.1, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAAOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAAOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11.1, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAA
Introduced01.03.2015 01.10.2013 01.10.2013
Manufacturerhttp://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...http://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...http://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT67354 x 1500 MHz? MHz600 MHz
Mediatek MT87354 x 1300 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT6735P4 x 1000 MHz? MHz600 MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? - ? MHz? - 600 MHz

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 2171     avg: 3387.3     median: 2974 (1%)     max: 6469 Points
min: 20006     avg: 20244     median: 20244 (4%)     max: 20482 Points
min: 7352     avg: 8363.3     median: 8041 (2%)     max: 10019 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 1375     avg: 1636.1     median: 1653 (0%)     max: 2008 Points
min: 4310     avg: 4909.2     median: 4794 (1%)     max: 6047 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 2265     avg: 3254.9     median: 3387 (0%)     max: 4050 Points
min: 8765     avg: 9157.7     median: 9135 (1%)     max: 9573 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited 2560x1440
min: 148     avg: 194.1     median: 187 (1%)     max: 284 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
min: 120     avg: 161     median: 162 (1%)     max: 237 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited 2560x1440
min: 93     avg: 142.1     median: 123 (2%)     max: 287 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
min: 74     avg: 94.8     median: 93 (1%)     max: 120 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + ARM Mali-T720
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + ARM Mali-T760 MP6
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + ARM Mali-T760 MP2
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T720
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP6
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP2
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
min: 1     avg: 2.5     median: 2 (0%)     max: 4 fps
min: 10     avg: 13.7     median: 13 (2%)     max: 17 fps
min: 1     avg: 4.4     median: 4 (1%)     max: 6 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
min: 1     avg: 4.7     median: 4 (1%)     max: 7 fps
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11 (3%)     max: 12 fps
min: 4     avg: 8.1     median: 7 (2%)     max: 13 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
1.8 fps (0%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
4 fps (2%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Taiji Free
min: 20     avg: 32.2     median: 27 (45%)     max: 52 fps
min: 31     avg: 36.6     median: 36 (60%)     max: 41 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality
min: 1485     avg: 2119     median: 1837 (4%)     max: 4005 fps
min: 4327     avg: 4513.5     median: 4513 (10%)     max: 4700 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality
min: 3159     avg: 4470.8     median: 3911 (9%)     max: 8103 fps
min: 10969     avg: 11318     median: 11318 (25%)     max: 11667 fps
NenaMark2
min: 46     avg: 48.2     median: 46 (69%)     max: 51 fps
min: 53     avg: 53.7     median: 53 (79%)     max: 54 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1568     avg: 2322.6     median: 2320 (11%)     max: 3158 Points
min: 3808     avg: 3881.5     median: 3881 (18%)     max: 3955 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 3D Graphics Tests
min: 457     avg: 651.7     median: 577 (9%)     max: 1115 Points
min: 1250     avg: 1274.5     median: 1274 (20%)     max: 1299 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Gaming Index
min: 3088     avg: 3260.8     median: 3183 (69%)     max: 3537 points
4489 points (98%)
min: 3843     avg: 4238.5     median: 4320 (94%)     max: 4489 points

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T720 → 100%

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP6 → 443%

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP2 → 216%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-T720:
12 fps  fps
Mali-T720:
»
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-T720:
30  fps
ultra
100%
Mali-T720:
28 fps  fps
Mali-T720:
»
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
100%
Mali-T720:
38  fps  fps
high
100%
Mali-T720:
35  fps  fps
Mali-T720:
»
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T720:
26 29 29 30 30 fps ~ 29 fps
Mali-T720:
»
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T720:
16 20 22 28 30 ~ 23 fps
high
100%
Mali-T720:
10 11 12 12 13 23 ~ 14 fps
Mali-T720:
»

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-T720:
14 fps 18 fps ~ 16 fps
high
100%
Mali-T720:
10 fps  fps
Mali-T720:
»
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
100%
Mali-T720:
15  fps
Mali-T720:
»
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T720:
59  fps
Mali-T720:
»

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T720 → 100%

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)