, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
 
 
 
 

ARM Mali-T760 MP6 vs ARM Mali-T760 MP2

ARM Mali-T760 MP6

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T760 MP6

The ARM Mali-T760 MP6 is a mobile graphics solution for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2015 and for example integrated in the Exynos 5433 Octa SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 - 16 cores/clusters.

The MP6 version offers 6 clusters clocked at up to 700 MHz (143 GFLOPS). According to first benchmarks, the performance is similar to the Adreno 420 and PowerVR GX6450. Therfore, even very demanding games of 2014 should run in high resolutions fluently.

ARM Mali-T760 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T760 MP2

The ARM Mali-T760 MP2 is a mobile graphics solution for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2015 and for example integrated in the MediaTek MT6752 SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 - 16 cores/clusters.

The MP2 version offers 2 clusters clocked at up to 700 MHz (48 GFLOPS). Therefore, it only offers one third of the theoretical performance of the T760MP6 version. The gaming performance should be similar to the Adreno 405 or PowerVR G6200. Therefore, it is situated in the middle class in 2014 and all games of that year should run fluently.

Due to the only 2 cores, the GPU is also suited for small tablets and smartphones.

show full text
ARM Mali-T760 MP6ARM Mali-T760 MP2
ManufacturerARMARM
Mali-T700 Series
Mali-T760 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 compare 1 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 compare 1 @ 0.6 GHz
CodenameMidgard (3rd Generation)Midgard (3rd Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (3rd-gen)Midgard (3rd-gen)
Pipelines6 - unified2 - unified
Core Speed700 MHz700 MHz
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 11DirectX 11.1
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAAOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11.1, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAA
Date of Announcement01.10.2013 01.10.2013
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...http://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...
CPU in Mali-T760 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa8 x 1900 MHz? MHz700 MHz
CPU in Mali-T760 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT87528 x 1700 MHz? MHz700 MHz
Mediatek MT67528 x 1700 MHz? MHz700 MHz
Mediatek MT87324 x 1500 MHz? MHz500 MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? MHz500 - 700 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 20006     avg: 20244     median: 20244 (3%)     max: 20482 Points
min: 7352     avg: 8363     median: 8041 (1%)     max: 10019 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 4310     avg: 4909     median: 4794.5 (1%)     max: 6047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 8765     avg: 9158     median: 9135 (1%)     max: 9573 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP6
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 24     avg: 31     median: 31 (0%)     max: 38 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP2
min: 13.2     avg: 16.1     median: 16 (0%)     max: 19.2 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP6
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
29 fps (1%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP2
min: 11     avg: 18.8     median: 19.3 (1%)     max: 25.7 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 10.4     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (1%)     max: 17 fps
min: 1     avg: 4.4     median: 5 (1%)     max: 6.1 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (3%)     max: 12 fps
min: 4.9     avg: 8.1     median: 7.4 (2%)     max: 13.3 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 31.7     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (60%)     max: 41.48 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 4327     avg: 4514     median: 4513.5 (10%)     max: 4700 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 10969     avg: 11318     median: 11318 (25%)     max: 11667 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 53     avg: 53.7     median: 53.7 (80%)     max: 54.4 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3808     avg: 3882     median: 3881.5 (4%)     max: 3955 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1250     avg: 1275     median: 1274.5 (3%)     max: 1299 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4489 (98%)
min: 3843     avg: 4239     median: 4320 (94%)     max: 4489

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP6 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP2 → 59% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 24. 11:10:04

#0 checking url part for id 5984 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5997 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:21:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.054s ... 0.055s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.055s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5984 +0.026s ... 0.08s

#8 got single benchmarks 5984 +0.007s ... 0.087s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5997 +0s ... 0.088s

#10 got single benchmarks 5997 +0.013s ... 0.1s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.1s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.108s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.108s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.112s

#15 return log +0.003s ... 0.114s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)