Lenovo V110-15IKB (i5-7200U, SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

The Lenovo V110-15IKB is a simple 15.6-inch office notebook aimed at private as well as professional users. It is powered by a Core i5 processor. The device is no stranger to us, as we have already reviewed its sister model, which is equipped with a Pentium Gold Processor. The laptop at hand is the top model of the series. The competitors are devices such as the Acer Extensa 2540-580K, the Fujitsu Lifebook E557, and the HP 250 G6.
Since both of the V110-15IKB models have an identical build, we will skip the details about the case, the connectivity, the input devices, and the speakers. You can find this information in our review of the 110-15IKB 80TH001SGE.
Connectivity
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 15-bs103ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 15-ay116ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo V110-15AST (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V110-15AST (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 15-ay116ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 15-bs103ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
Lenovo V110-15AST | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
Lenovo V110-15AST |
Display - Average at Best
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 260 cd/m²
Contrast: 607:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.85 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 14.14 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.92% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.71% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Extensa 2540-580K TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 15-bs103ng TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Fujitsu Lifebook E557 TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | HP 250 G6 2UB93ES TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 15-ay116ng TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo V110-15AST TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | -0% | 3% | 7% | 2% | 4% | 6% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 36.71 | 37.59 2% | 36.55 0% | 37.9 3% | 39.11 7% | 37.34 2% | 38.23 4% | 38.91 6% |
sRGB Coverage | 55.3 | 56.5 2% | 55 -1% | 56.8 3% | 58.8 6% | 56.2 2% | 57.6 4% | 58.6 6% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 37.92 | 38.84 2% | 37.76 0% | 39.15 3% | 40.41 7% | 38.58 2% | 39.5 4% | 40.2 6% |
Response Times | -35% | -38% | -61% | -1% | -38% | -9% | -21% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 41 ? -0% | 44 ? -7% | 50 ? -22% | 42 ? -2% | 40 ? 2% | 48 ? -17% | 39 ? 5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 13 ? | 22 ? -69% | 22 ? -69% | 26 ? -100% | 13 ? -0% | 23 ? -77% | 13 ? -0% | 19 ? -46% |
PWM Frequency | 27000 ? | 210 ? | 2500 ? | 10000 ? | ||||
Screen | -5% | -5% | 2% | -3% | 1% | -6% | -1% | |
Brightness middle | 249 | 215 -14% | 241 -3% | 214 -14% | 184 -26% | 249 0% | 230 -8% | 243 -2% |
Brightness | 247 | 217 -12% | 235 -5% | 213 -14% | 178 -28% | 234 -5% | 227 -8% | 233 -6% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 92 5% | 84 -5% | 88 0% | 80 -9% | 89 1% | 92 5% | 75 -15% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.68 -66% | 0.43 -5% | 0.53 -29% | 0.38 7% | 0.44 -7% | 0.54 -32% | 0.45 -10% |
Contrast | 607 | 316 -48% | 560 -8% | 404 -33% | 484 -20% | 566 -7% | 426 -30% | 540 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 12.85 | 9.14 29% | 13.62 -6% | 7.93 38% | 11.29 12% | 11.71 9% | 12.91 -0% | 11.69 9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.85 | 15.46 29% | 22.81 -4% | 13.9 36% | 19.48 11% | 19.51 11% | 22.07 -1% | 20.08 8% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 14.14 | 10.08 29% | 15.19 -7% | 9.37 34% | 12.43 12% | 13.13 7% | 14.11 -0% | 13.12 7% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.07 106% | 2.13 103% | 2.32 95% | 2.34 94% | 2.57 86% | 2.5 88% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 17285 38% | 10158 64% | 17407 37% | 9971 65% | 13823 47% | 15273 43% | 17819 36% | 16905 38% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 35 | 36 3% | 35 0% | 36 3% | 37 6% | 36 3% | 37 6% | 37 6% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56 | 56 0% | 55 -2% | 56 0% | 59 5% | 56 0% | 58 4% | 59 5% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-7% | -14% /
-8% | -19% /
-6% | 1% /
-1% | -12% /
-4% | -4% /
-5% | -5% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8576 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). |
Lenovo equipped the V110-15IKB with a viewing-angle dependent TN panel. Thus, the screen is not legible from every position. Outdoors, the laptop can only be used if the sun is not shining too brightly.
Performance - Mid-range Hardware in a Low-Cost Case
The Lenovo V110-15IKB is a simple 15.6-inch office notebook. It offers enough processing power for office and Internet applications. Our test device is available for about 600 to 650 Euros (~$738 to ~$800). Variants with different hardware are available in a price range starting at 350 Euros (~$431).
Processor - No Lack of Processing Power
The Lenovo device utilizes an Intel Core i5-7200U (Kaby Lake) dual-core processor. This ULV model (TDP: 15 watts) works at a base speed of 2.5 GHz. It can be boosted to 3.1 GHz (both cores) via Turbo. The results of the CPU tests we conducted are at a normal level for the built-in processor. During the tests, the processor worked at 3.1 GHz (single-thread) and 2.9 to 3.1 GHz (multithread) in both AC and battery modes.
Whether the Turbo Boost can be used permanently was determined via looping the Cinebench R15 Multithread test for about 30 minutes. The results remained at the same level consistently, so there was no drop in performance. The Turbo worked constantly at 2.9 to 3.1 GHz.
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (98 - 294, n=89, last 2 years) | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U (88 - 132, n=101) | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Lenovo V110-15AST | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (246 - 3132, n=91, last 2 years) | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U (268 - 337, n=101) | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Lenovo V110-15AST |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Average of class Office (3562 - 10126, n=13, last 2 years) | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U (4787 - 5022, n=47) | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Lenovo V110-15AST | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Average of class Office (13854 - 48792, n=13, last 2 years) | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U (9213 - 11955, n=47) | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Lenovo V110-15AST |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U (6297 - 6932, n=30) | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Lenovo V110-15AST | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U (2812 - 3209, n=30) | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Lenovo V110-15AST |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average of class Office (15439 - 31951, n=2, last 2 years) | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U (6425 - 7439, n=30) | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Lenovo V110-15AST | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average of class Office (6329 - 7340, n=2, last 2 years) | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U (3484 - 3902, n=30) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Lenovo V110-15AST |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average of class Office (9856 - 41544, n=10, last 2 years) | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U (7066 - 7767, n=15) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Lenovo V110-15AST | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average of class Office (3411 - 8042, n=10, last 2 years) | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U (3648 - 3958, n=15) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Lenovo V110-15AST |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Office (414 - 544, n=7, last 2 years) | |
HP 15-bs103ng (Edge 41) | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K (Edge 41) | |
HP 15-ay116ng (Edge 38) | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U (127.7 - 223, n=69) | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE (Edge 41) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE (Edge 40) | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES (Edge 41) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 | |
Lenovo V110-15AST (Edge 41) |
System Performance - A Fast, Smooth System
The combination of a Core i5 processor, a solid state drive, and memory working in dual-channel mode ensures a system which runs fast and smoothly and which has more than enough processing power for office and Internet applications. The really good PCMark benchmark results confirm this assessment. It is not possible to increase the performance any further; Lenovo has already exhausted all possibilities.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3663 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4407 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4624 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3207 points | |
Help |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Average of class Office (4252 - 4830, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U, Intel HD Graphics 620 (2761 - 3831, n=65) | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Lenovo V110-15AST | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-7200U, Intel HD Graphics 620 (4036 - 4857, n=51) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Average of class Office (2900 - 5420, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V110-15AST |
Storage Devices - Intel's SSD Is on a Par with the Competitors
A solid state drive by Intel is used as the system drive. The SSD is a 2.5-inch SATA III model with a capacity of 256 GB. Out-of-the-box, 185 GB of the 256 GB is available, the rest being occupied by the recovery partition and the Windows installation. The SSD's transfer rates are good.
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE Intel 545s SSDSC2KW256G8L | Acer Extensa 2540-580K Kingston RBUSC180DS37256GH | HP 15-bs103ng Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Fujitsu Lifebook E557 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | HP 15-ay116ng Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | Lenovo V110-15AST Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE Ramxel S121 RTNRB256RFM4KWDL | Average Intel 545s SSDSC2KW256G8L | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 2% | 6% | -24% | 1% | 2% | -92% | -17% | 0% | 162% | |
Read Seq | 536 | 473.9 -12% | 504 -6% | 417.2 -22% | 488 -9% | 501 -7% | 81.6 -85% | 477.4 -11% | 536 ? 0% | 2618 ? 388% |
Write Seq | 407.3 | 467.1 15% | 466.2 14% | 262.6 -36% | 455 12% | 483.9 19% | 83.6 -79% | 284.2 -30% | 407 ? 0% | 2486 ? 510% |
Read 512 | 393.4 | 318.3 -19% | 443.7 13% | 389.5 -1% | 426.4 8% | 413.8 5% | 28.95 -93% | 356.3 -9% | 393 ? 0% | 506 ? 29% |
Write 512 | 324.7 | 441.3 36% | 398.4 23% | 263 -19% | 390.7 20% | 294.9 -9% | 75.6 -77% | 282.3 -13% | 325 ? 0% | 1429 ? 340% |
Read 4k | 36.92 | 33.06 -10% | 38.81 5% | 17.5 -53% | 37.68 2% | 34.91 -5% | 0.42 -99% | 24.15 -35% | 36.9 ? 0% | 40.2 ? 9% |
Write 4k | 89.1 | 77.7 -13% | 94.6 6% | 60.6 -32% | 76.9 -14% | 95.7 7% | 0.209 -100% | 71.9 -19% | 89.1 ? 0% | 98.1 ? 10% |
Read 4k QD32 | 314.4 | 310.1 -1% | 295.2 -6% | 311.4 -1% | 286.5 -9% | 370.9 18% | 0.972 -100% | 283.7 -10% | 314 ? 0% | 327 ? 4% |
Write 4k QD32 | 270.1 | 317.1 17% | 266.6 -1% | 201.1 -26% | 253.1 -6% | 243.6 -10% | 0.347 -100% | 257.3 -5% | 270 ? 0% | 285 ? 6% |
GPU - Enough Performance for Office and Internet Applications
The video output is processed by Intel's HD Graphics 620 graphics core. The GPU supports DirectX 12 and works at a speed of up to 1000 MHz. The 3DMark benchmark results are at a normal level for this kind of GPU. The user benefits from the fact that the RAM runs in dual-channel mode: The graphics core can be better utilized, and hence it can deliver a higher performance.
3DMark 11 Performance | 1679 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6367 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 959 points | |
Help |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Office (1468 - 16418, n=85, last 2 years) | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
HP 15-ba077ng | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
Average Intel HD Graphics 620 (1067 - 1777, n=132) | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
HP 255 G6 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
Lenovo V110-15AST |
Gaming Performance - Some Classics Are Playable
The hardware of the V110-15IKB is able to run some games smoothly. This applies mostly to titles with low system requirements, but the user will have to settle for low resolutions and low graphics settings. The dual-channel RAM has positive effects on the gaming performance. The frame rates are higher than those of comparable devices operating in single-channel mode. However, games with high hardware requirements, such as Kingdom Come: Deliverance, are not playable.
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 57.1 | 29 | 24.8 | 8.4 |
Fortnite (2018) | 39.1 | 10.1 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 8.9 | |||
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 11.5 | 5.7 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 23.9 | 15.2 |
Emissions & Energy
System Noise - The V110-15IKB: A Quiet Machine
The V110-15IKB does not produce a lot of noise, regardless of the load. Under low load and while idling, the cooling fan usually stands still, meaning the device is completely silent under these circumstances. Under load, the fan speeds up slightly. We measured a maximum noise level of only 34 dB(A) during our stress test. The cooling fan's noise is definitely acceptable.
The cooling fan of the Pentium sister model, which we have already reviewed, produces a low-pitched whirring sound that can be tolerated for a short period of time. However, our current test device does not produce this sound. So interested customers should check in advance before the purchase of a V110-15IKB device whether the cooling fan produces a whirring sound, and if that is the case, whether that sound is tolerable to the user or not.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 31 dB(A) |
DVD |
| 35.7 / dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.7 / 34 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Temperature - No Hot Flushes
The V110-15IKB had similar results in both AC and battery modes during our stress test (Prime95 and Furmark running for at least one hour). The processor ran at a speed of 1.1 GHz during the test and the graphics core worked at 800 to 850 MHz.
The Lenovo device does not heat up particularly. During the stress test, it only just passed the 30 °C mark at some measurement points.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.6 °C / -6.5 F).
Spreaker - Only Mono Sound in the Repertoire
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | very high highs - on average 15.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (52.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Frequency diagram in comparison (checkboxes can be turned on/off!)
Power Consumption - Energy-Efficient 15.6-Inch Device
Regardless of the load, Lenovo's 15.6-inch device does not draw too much power. In idle mode, we measured a maximum power consumption of 6.9 watts. During the stress test, the power consumption rose to only 28.7 watts, since the processor throttles considerably. The power supply has a nominal output of 45 watts.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Battery Runtime - No Long-Distance Runner
We simulated the load of accessing websites via a script in our practically-oriented Wi-Fi test. The energy profile "balanced" was activated, the display brightness was set to about 150 cd/m², and the energy-saving functions were disabled. The V110-15IKB achieved a runtime of 3:56 h, which is on a par with the Pentium sister model. Therefore, both devices have lousy battery runtimes. The batteries' low capacities are to blame. Lenovo installed models with a capacity of 32 Wh.
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Average of class Office (230 - 1614, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Acer Extensa 2540-580K | |
HP 15-bs103ng | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 | |
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
Lenovo V110-15AST |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Lenovo V110-15IKB was created for users who would like to own a simple office laptop that includes a Windows 10 Pro operating system. The 15.6-inch device comes with a Core i5 processor belonging to the Kaby Lake generation. Hence, it offers more than enough processing power for office and Internet applications. Furthermore, it is equipped with a fast solid state drive and with RAM working in dual-channel mode. The device usually works quietly or even silently and does not heat up particularly. In addition, it has a decent keyboard.
To sum up: The user receives a simple office laptop to use at home and/or at work.
However, the device is not without flaws. Lenovo installed a dark, viewing-angle dependent display with poor contrast, which has only the matte surface as its sole advantage. The battery runtimes are lousy and the case is not the most stable of its kind. Furthermore, the laptop has only average Wi-Fi transfer rates and Lenovo offers a warranty of just one year.
Taking into account the price range of 600 to 650 Euros (~$738 to ~$800), there are just too many flaws. However, it should be noted that the Windows 10 Pro license pushes up the price. Users who do not require a high CPU performance might want to take a look at the much more inexpensive Pentium Gold models of the V110-15IKB instead.
Lenovo V110-15IKB 80TH001WGE
- 03/02/2018 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck