Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 810

HiSilicon Kirin 990

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 990

The HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the Huawei Mate 30 Pro in late 2019. It integrates eight CPU cores in three clusters. The performance cluster contains two Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.86 GHz, the balanced cluster contains also two Cortex-A76 cores but with only up to 2.09 GHz and finally the power saving cluster contains four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.86 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a neural processor (1 + 1 cores) for AI tasks and a ARM Mali-G76 MP16 GPU clcoked at up to 600 MHz. Compared to the 5G version, the 4G Kirin 990 integrates a fast 4G modem and is slightly lower clocked (2 of the 3 clusters and the GPU).

The Kirin 990 is produced in the modern 7nm process at TSMC.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus (855+) Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in 2019. Compared to the normal Snapdragon 855, the 855 Plus offers higher clock speeds of the GPU and CPU. The SoC integrates a fast ‘Prime Core’ that clocks up to 2.96 GHz (up from 2.84 GHz in the 855) and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to 2.42 GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of 1.8 GHz.

The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE Cat.20 and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too.

Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to 802.11 ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds.

The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit (NPU) with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC.

The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine (CV-ISP) that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption.

The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM (4 x 16-bit). As the SD855, the 855+ integrates an Adreno 640 graphics card that is now higher clocked and should offer a 15% higher performance.

Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855+ at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) using a 7 nm FinFET process. 

HiSilicon Kirin 810

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 810

The HiSilicon Kirin 810 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2019 and contains 8 processor cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.27 GHz and six small power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.88 GHz (bigLITTLE). Furthermore, the SoC integrates a mid range graphics card called ARM Mali-G52 MP6 with 6 clusters. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 810 integrates a Ascend D100 Lite NPU (Da Vinci architecture). The integrates LTE modem supports Cat.12/13 with Dual Sim VoLTE. For photography, the Kirin 810 integrates the Kirin ISP4.0. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X at up to 2133 MHz. Furthermore, WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 5.0 are integrated in the chip.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 990Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 PlusHiSilicon Kirin 810
SeriesHiSilicon Qualcomm SnapdragonHiSilicon
CodenameCortex-A76/-A55Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)Cortex-A76/-A55
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 « - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8201.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8101.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 - 2.96 GHz8 / 8 cores5 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus « - 2.96 GHz8 / 8 cores5 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8552.84 GHz8 / 8 cores5 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8201.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 « 1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Clock <=2860 MHz <=2960 MHz1880 - 2270 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Transistors8000 Million
Technology7 nm7 nm7 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G76MP16 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.86 GHz) + 2x Cortex-A76 (2.36) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.95 GHz, big.LITTLE), 4G ModemX24 LTE Modem, Adreno 640 GPUARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A55 (1.88 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 1400 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 200 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 5, WiFi a/b/g/n/ac, AGPS, Glonass, Baidou
iGPUARM Mali-G76 MP16 ( - 600 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 640 (250 - 675 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP6
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
L2 Cache1.8 MB
L3 Cache5 MB
TDP5 Watt
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 990
min: 1.067     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (82%)     max: 1.3 pt
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855+
1 pt (73%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810
0.7 pt (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 19565     avg: 31512     median: 31512 (27%)     max: 43459 Points
min: 30069     avg: 34737     median: 32129 (27%)     max: 42240 Points
min: 18123     avg: 23401     median: 24426 (21%)     max: 27654 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4756     avg: 5166     median: 5166 (61%)     max: 5576 Points
min: 3137     avg: 4371     median: 4659 (55%)     max: 4737 Points
min: 3501     avg: 3731     median: 3720 (44%)     max: 3972 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4702     avg: 4918     median: 4917.5 (56%)     max: 5133 Points
min: 3143     avg: 4323     median: 4560.5 (52%)     max: 4725 Points
min: 3463     avg: 3749     median: 3782 (43%)     max: 4003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 759     avg: 770     median: 770 (32%)     max: 781 Points
min: 738     avg: 751     median: 751 (32%)     max: 764 Points
min: 592     avg: 598     median: 598 (25%)     max: 604 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2893     avg: 2978     median: 2977.5 (5%)     max: 3062 Points
min: 2652     avg: 2659     median: 2658.5 (5%)     max: 2665 Points
min: 1890     avg: 1920     median: 1919.5 (3%)     max: 1949 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
783 Points (3%)
101%
1 SD 855+ +
min: 761     avg: 782     median: 787.5 (3%)     max: 792 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3059 Points (10%)
min: 2519     avg: 2788     median: 2846.5 (9%)     max: 2940 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3865     avg: 3882     median: 3881.5 (39%)     max: 3898 Points
min: 3603     avg: 3654     median: 3654 (37%)     max: 3705 Points
2836 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11885     avg: 12083     median: 12082.5 (13%)     max: 12280 Points
min: 9705     avg: 10547     median: 10546.5 (12%)     max: 11388 Points
7891 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3910 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11615 Points (28%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
10281 Points (16%)
8497 Points (13%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3272 Points (49%)
3359 Points (50%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3891 Points (31%)
2627 Points (21%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5595 Points (51%)
3579 Points (32%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
19729 Points (39%)
17637 Points (35%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
9053 Points (18%)
7818 Points (16%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
11581 Points (30%)
9887 Points (26%)
0 Points (0%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1963     avg: 2154     median: 2154 (3%)     max: 2345 ms
min: 2007     avg: 2054     median: 2032 (2%)     max: 2134 ms
min: 2472     avg: 2950     median: 2646 (3%)     max: 3731 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 19885     avg: 21727     median: 21726.5 (20%)     max: 23568 Points
min: 23781     avg: 24606     median: 24571 (22%)     max: 25353 Points
min: 15947     avg: 16825     median: 16604 (15%)     max: 17925 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 97     avg: 108     median: 108 (23%)     max: 119 Points
min: 89     avg: 98.2     median: 98 (20%)     max: 111 Points
min: 71     avg: 83.7     median: 83 (17%)     max: 97 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 SD 855+ +
12537 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 SD 855+ +
81494 Points (100%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 SD 855+ +
175688 Points (55%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 SD 855+ +
125546 Points (77%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 855+ +
395265 Points (70%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 70955     avg: 85363     median: 85363 (71%)     max: 99771 Points
min: 66276     avg: 72044     median: 71855 (60%)     max: 78191 Points
min: 55189     avg: 62040     median: 58957 (49%)     max: 71973 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 62954     avg: 81672     median: 81672 (66%)     max: 100390 Points
min: 64026     avg: 80567     median: 82790.5 (67%)     max: 92659 Points
min: 45079     avg: 53673     median: 47554 (38%)     max: 68387 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 110095     avg: 135414     median: 135414 (25%)     max: 160733 Points
min: 169591     avg: 184179     median: 184036 (34%)     max: 199051 Points
min: 56693     avg: 68299     median: 64645 (12%)     max: 83558 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 136219     avg: 143683     median: 143682 (52%)     max: 151146 Points
min: 132673     avg: 139174     median: 139170 (50%)     max: 145684 Points
min: 92494     avg: 97432     median: 94457 (34%)     max: 105346 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 409039     avg: 446132     median: 446132 (43%)     max: 483224 Points
min: 462125     avg: 478464     median: 474972 (46%)     max: 501784 Points
min: 259370     avg: 291444     median: 295579 (28%)     max: 319383 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
261357 Points (34%)
min: 237506     avg: 249793     median: 249792 (33%)     max: 262079 Points
217082 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 5756     avg: 7469     median: 7469 (39%)     max: 9182 Points
min: 6325     avg: 7543     median: 7424 (39%)     max: 8880 Points
4294 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
29072 Points (62%)
min: 13484     avg: 15895     median: 15894.5 (34%)     max: 18305 Points
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 8636     avg: 9479     median: 9479 (62%)     max: 10322 Points
min: 8702     avg: 10315     median: 10351.5 (68%)     max: 11690 Points
min: 7541     avg: 8133     median: 7695 (50%)     max: 9164 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 10918     avg: 12433     median: 12432.5 (62%)     max: 13947 Points
min: 10286     avg: 13201     median: 12786 (64%)     max: 15510 Points
min: 9189     avg: 10361     median: 9824 (49%)     max: 12070 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 990 → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus → 93% n=27

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 810 → 51% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 01. 04:45:34

#0 checking url part for id 11510 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11491 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12116 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 31 May 2024 05:40:08 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.107s ... 0.108s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.108s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11510 +0.015s ... 0.123s

#8 got single benchmarks 11510 +0.013s ... 0.136s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11491 +0.012s ... 0.148s

#10 got single benchmarks 11491 +0.031s ... 0.178s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12116 +0.011s ... 0.19s

#12 got single benchmarks 12116 +0.015s ... 0.205s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.205s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.117s ... 0.321s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.329s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.331s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.333s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.341s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.349s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.356s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.365s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.372s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.078s ... 0.449s

#24 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.461s

#25 return log +0s ... 0.461s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)