Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T

The Mediatek Helio X25 MT6797T is an upper mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in 2016. It is manufactured in a 20 nm process and is equipped with 10 CPU cores. Two fast Cortex-A72 cores are running at up to 2.5 GHz, four Cortex-A53 cores at up to 2 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.55 GHz. All cores support 64-bit and the utilization of three clusters is supposed to improve efficiency according to Mediatek. The two A72 cores are only designed for short "Burst-Performance scenarios" according to Mediatek and are probably not used for sustained workloads. Compared to the similar Helio X20, the X25 offers faster clocked CPU and GPU cores.

The integrated ARM Mali T880 MP4 GPU is clocked at up to 850 MHz and has four cluster (from 16) from the Midgard (4th Gen) architecture.

The chip also includes an LTE modem (Cat. 6 300/50 Mbps, DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, CDMA2000, ...) as well as a WLAN 802.11ac (280 Mbps) modem. GPS/Glonass/BeiDou is supported for location. The integrated video encoder can handle up to 4Kx2K H.265 at 30 fps and HDR. The SoC can also decode H.265, H.264 and VP9 in 4K30. 

Power Consumption

The processor is manufactured in a 20 nm process at TSMC and should have an average power consumption under load.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

ModelMediatek Helio X25 MTK6797TQualcomm Snapdragon 662
SeriesMediatek Mediatek Helio 20Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A72 / A53Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T « 2.5 GHz10 / 10 cores Cortex-A72 / A53
Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797 compare2.3 GHz10 / 10 cores Cortex-A72 / A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock2500 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads10 / 108 / 8
Technology20 nm11 nm
FeaturesUMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 6, TD-SCDMA, 802.11ac WiFi, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, eMMC 5.1, 4K@30 H.265 Video Encoder, H.265 4K@30 Decode, ARM Mali 780 MHzAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISP
iGPUARM Mali-T880 MP4 ( - 850 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 610
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
10490 Points (9%)
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1523 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1372 Points (16%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (9%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1791 Points (18%)
1472 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4554 Points (5%)
4938 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
6470 ms (8%)
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
6089 Points (5%)
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (9%)     max: 10247 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (11%)     max: 59 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
43413 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
6782 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
24236 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
23529 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
41218 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
95765 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 26857     avg: 35819     median: 37388 (31%)     max: 38718 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 32579     avg: 37486     median: 34946 (28%)     max: 46499 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 25724     avg: 33052     median: 33402 (6%)     max: 43315 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 68508     avg: 70945     median: 71065 (26%)     max: 72576 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (12%)     max: 211557 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (18%)     max: 68731 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 662 +
16222 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
5563 Points (28%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (16%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (19%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (17%)     max: 12884 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (26%)     max: 7554 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 5866     avg: 6258     median: 6139 (40%)     max: 7184 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 137% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 04:09:15

#0 checking url part for id 10556 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.017s ... 0.018s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10556 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#7 got single benchmarks 10556 +0.008s ... 0.028s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.016s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.037s ... 0.081s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.081s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.139s ... 0.22s

#12 return log +0.034s ... 0.255s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)