Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9825 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810

Samsung Exynos 9825

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9825

The Samsung Exynos 9 9825 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in the Samsung Note 10 line in August 2019. The processor integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to 2.73 GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to 2.4 GHz (up from 2.3 GHz in the 9820). Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to 1.9 GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ.

The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 (8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload). The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. Thanks to higher clock rates, the G76 is now a bit faster compared to the Exynos 9820.

The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. Due to the slight changes in clock rates, it is very comparable to the older Eynos 9 9820. Maybe in longer load phases, the improved 7nm process helps to maintain clock speeds a bit better. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks.

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 7nm LPP (with EUV) process that should improve power efficiency compared to the Exynos 9820.

HiSilicon Kirin 810

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 810

The HiSilicon Kirin 810 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2019 and contains 8 processor cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.27 GHz and six small power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.88 GHz (bigLITTLE). Furthermore, the SoC integrates a mid range graphics card called ARM Mali-G52 MP6 with 6 clusters. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 810 integrates a Ascend D100 Lite NPU (Da Vinci architecture). The integrates LTE modem supports Cat.12/13 with Dual Sim VoLTE. For photography, the Kirin 810 integrates the Kirin ISP4.0. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X at up to 2133 MHz. Furthermore, WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 5.0 are integrated in the chip.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

ModelSamsung Exynos 9825HiSilicon Kirin 810
SeriesSamsung ExynosHiSilicon
CodenameExynos M3 / Cortex-A55Cortex-A76/-A55
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
Samsung Exynos 9825 « 1.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9820 compare1.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 compare - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 compare1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e compare1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 « 1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Clock1900 - 2730 MHz1880 - 2270 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm7 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory ControllerARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A55 (1.88 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 1400 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 200 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 5, WiFi a/b/g/n/ac, AGPS, Glonass, Baidou
iGPUARM Mali-G76 MP12ARM Mali-G52 MP6
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810
0.7 pt (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 31908     avg: 32588     median: 32588 (27%)     max: 33268 Points
min: 18123     avg: 23401     median: 24426 (21%)     max: 27654 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3389     avg: 3519     median: 3519 (41%)     max: 3649 Points
min: 3501     avg: 3731     median: 3720 (44%)     max: 3972 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3498     avg: 3622     median: 3622 (41%)     max: 3746 Points
min: 3463     avg: 3749     median: 3782 (43%)     max: 4003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
834 Points (35%)
min: 592     avg: 598     median: 598 (25%)     max: 604 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2331 Points (4%)
min: 1890     avg: 1920     median: 1919.5 (3%)     max: 1949 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 805     avg: 814     median: 813.5 (4%)     max: 822 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2177     avg: 2184     median: 2184 (7%)     max: 2191 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4549     avg: 4550     median: 4550 (45%)     max: 4551 Points
2836 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10367     avg: 10426     median: 10425.5 (12%)     max: 10484 Points
7891 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5109 Points (70%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10487 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7453 Points (12%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2169 Points (32%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3566 Points (29%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5534 Points (50%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
13991 Points (27%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7083 Points (14%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
8839 Points (23%)
0 Points (0%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2478     avg: 2503     median: 2503 (3%)     max: 2528 ms
min: 2472     avg: 2950     median: 2646 (3%)     max: 3731 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 18908     avg: 19022     median: 19021.5 (17%)     max: 19135 Points
min: 15947     avg: 16825     median: 16604 (15%)     max: 17925 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 97     avg: 107.5     median: 107.5 (22%)     max: 118 Points
min: 71     avg: 83.7     median: 83 (17%)     max: 97 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 291772     avg: 292608     median: 292608 (100%)     max: 293444 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 18280     avg: 18321     median: 18320.5 (56%)     max: 18361 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 70640     avg: 70670     median: 70669.5 (87%)     max: 70699 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 155432     avg: 155907     median: 155906 (48%)     max: 156381 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 101869     avg: 102259     median: 102259 (63%)     max: 102649 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 347082     avg: 347156     median: 347156 (61%)     max: 347229 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 55189     avg: 62040     median: 58957 (49%)     max: 71973 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 45079     avg: 53673     median: 47554 (38%)     max: 68387 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 56693     avg: 68299     median: 64645 (12%)     max: 83558 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 92494     avg: 97432     median: 94457 (34%)     max: 105346 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 259370     avg: 291444     median: 295579 (28%)     max: 319383 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
215665 Points (28%)
217082 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5864 Points (31%)
4294 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22707 Points (49%)
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 8801     avg: 8914     median: 8914 (58%)     max: 9027 Points
min: 7541     avg: 8133     median: 7695 (50%)     max: 9164 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 11011     avg: 11412     median: 11412 (57%)     max: 11813 Points
min: 9189     avg: 10361     median: 9824 (49%)     max: 12070 Points

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9825 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 810 → 54% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 06. 16:43:29

#0 checking url part for id 11485 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12116 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.058s ... 0.06s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.06s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11485 +0.003s ... 0.062s

#7 got single benchmarks 11485 +0.012s ... 0.074s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12116 +0.016s ... 0.09s

#9 got single benchmarks 12116 +0.011s ... 0.101s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.101s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.071s ... 0.173s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.177s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.179s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.181s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.187s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.191s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.196s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.201s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.205s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.049s ... 0.254s

#21 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.262s

#22 return log +0.028s ... 0.29s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)