Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9611 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990

Samsung Exynos 9611

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9611

The Samsung Exynos 9611 (or Exynos 7 Series 9611) is a mid-range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates 8 processor cores in two clusters (bigLITTLE concept). Four ARM Cortex A73 cores at up to 2.3 GHz for demanding tasks and four ARM Cortex A53 at up to 1.7 GHz for power efficiency. Compared to the older Exynos 9610, the 9611 supports higher resolutions for the rear faced camera.

The integrated LTE modem supports 4G at up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload. Furthermore, 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0 are also integrated in the chip.

The on-board ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics card offers three clusters and support for Vulkan, DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2.

The Exynos 9611 is manufactured in the modern 10nm FinFET process and therefore relatively power efficient and also suited for smaller smartphones.

HiSilicon Kirin 990

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 990

The HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the Huawei Mate 30 Pro in late 2019. It integrates eight CPU cores in three clusters. The performance cluster contains two Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.86 GHz, the balanced cluster contains also two Cortex-A76 cores but with only up to 2.09 GHz and finally the power saving cluster contains four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.86 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a neural processor (1 + 1 cores) for AI tasks and a ARM Mali-G76 MP16 GPU clcoked at up to 600 MHz. Compared to the 5G version, the 4G Kirin 990 integrates a fast 4G modem and is slightly lower clocked (2 of the 3 clusters and the GPU).

The Kirin 990 is produced in the modern 7nm process at TSMC.

ModelSamsung Exynos 9611HiSilicon Kirin 990
SeriesSamsung ExynosHiSilicon
CodenameExynos 7 SeriesCortex-A76/-A55
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
Samsung Exynos 9611 « 1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9610 compare1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9609 compare1.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 « - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 compare1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e compare1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 compare1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Clock1700 - 2300 MHz <=2860 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology10 nm7 nm
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP3ARM Mali-G76 MP16 ( - 600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.com
Transistors8000 Million
FeaturesARM Mali-G76MP16 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.86 GHz) + 2x Cortex-A76 (2.36) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.95 GHz, big.LITTLE), 4G Modem

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 9611
0.5 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 990
min: 1.067     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (82%)     max: 1.3 pt
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13103     avg: 18907     median: 20010 (17%)     max: 20393 Points
min: 19565     avg: 31512     median: 31512 (27%)     max: 43459 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1463     avg: 2115     median: 2260 (27%)     max: 2332 Points
min: 4756     avg: 5166     median: 5166 (61%)     max: 5576 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1402     avg: 2087     median: 2279 (26%)     max: 2336 Points
min: 4702     avg: 4918     median: 4917.5 (56%)     max: 5133 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 345     avg: 347.3     median: 347.5 (15%)     max: 349 Points
min: 759     avg: 770     median: 770 (32%)     max: 781 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1207     avg: 1310     median: 1323.5 (2%)     max: 1387 Points
min: 2893     avg: 2978     median: 2977.5 (5%)     max: 3062 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 345     avg: 347     median: 347 (2%)     max: 349 Points
783 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1063     avg: 1229     median: 1299 (4%)     max: 1326 Points
3059 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3865     avg: 3882     median: 3881.5 (39%)     max: 3898 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11885     avg: 12083     median: 12082.5 (13%)     max: 12280 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3910 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11615 Points (28%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
10281 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3272 Points (49%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3891 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5595 Points (51%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
19729 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
9053 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
11581 Points (30%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4332     avg: 4863     median: 4786 (6%)     max: 6212 ms
min: 1963     avg: 2154     median: 2154 (3%)     max: 2345 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 7442     avg: 9667     median: 9810 (9%)     max: 10687 Points
min: 19885     avg: 21727     median: 21726.5 (20%)     max: 23568 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 46     avg: 53.4     median: 55 (11%)     max: 57 Points
min: 97     avg: 108     median: 108 (23%)     max: 119 Points
min: 70955     avg: 85363     median: 85363 (71%)     max: 99771 Points
min: 62954     avg: 81672     median: 81672 (66%)     max: 100390 Points
min: 110095     avg: 135414     median: 135414 (25%)     max: 160733 Points
min: 136219     avg: 143683     median: 143682 (52%)     max: 151146 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 152185     avg: 175473     median: 177197 (17%)     max: 187087 Points
min: 409039     avg: 446132     median: 446132 (43%)     max: 483224 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
150124 Points (20%)
261357 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5080     avg: 5572     median: 5587 (37%)     max: 5925 Points
min: 8636     avg: 9479     median: 9479 (62%)     max: 10322 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5777     avg: 6166     median: 6144 (31%)     max: 6697 Points
min: 10918     avg: 12433     median: 12432.5 (62%)     max: 13947 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 5756     avg: 7469     median: 7469 (39%)     max: 9182 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
29072 Points (62%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9611 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 990 → 214% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 01:23:31

#0 checking url part for id 11543 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11510 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.064s ... 0.065s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.065s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11543 +0.015s ... 0.08s

#7 got single benchmarks 11543 +0.018s ... 0.098s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11510 +0.012s ... 0.11s

#9 got single benchmarks 11510 +0.01s ... 0.12s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.12s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.143s ... 0.263s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.287s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)