Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 850 vs Mediatek MT8752

Samsung Exynos 850

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 850

The Samsung Exynos 850 is a System on a Chip (SoC) for entry level smartphones (Android based). It was announced in May 2020 and the first device with it is the Samsung Galaxy A21s. The chip integrates a processor with 8 small ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock with up to 2 GHz (octa core).

The multi threaded performance is quite good thanks to 8 cores, the single threaded performance suffers a bit from the small A55 cores, although the clock rate of up to 2 GHz can help a bit.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE modem (Cat.7 2CA up to 300 MBit/s download, Cat.13 2CA 150 MBit/s upload), a Wi-fi 5 modem (802.11ac), LPPDDR4x memory controller, eMMC 5.1 flash memory controller and a video engine for FHD 60fps encoding and decoding (H.265, H.264, VP9).

It is manufactured in the modern 8nm LPP process at Samsung and should offer a good power efficiency and therefore it is also suited for small smartphones.

Mediatek MT8752

► remove from comparison  MT8752

The MediaTek MT8752 is a ARM based SoC for mostly Android based tablets and smartphones. It integrates 8 small ARM Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.7 GHz. The integrated graphics card is an ARM Mali-T760MP2 with up to 700 MHz clock speed. Furthermore, an LTE modem and a video de- and encoder are integrated in the chip.

ModelSamsung Exynos 850Mediatek MT8752
SeriesSamsung Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A55Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Samsung Exynos 850 « - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A55
Allwinner A523 compare0.48 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A55
UNISOC SC9863A compare1.2 - 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores512 KB L3 Cortex-A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 « 1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock <=2000 MHz1700 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology8 nm28 nm
FeaturesLTE Cat.7 / Cat.13, LPDDR4x RAM, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5), 48 MP Camera, eMMC 5.1, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo4G LTE (Cat. 4), HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, WLAN (2,4 + 5 GHz), Bluetooth, GPS, FM receiver, H.265 Decoder, ARM Mali-T760 MP2 GPU
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP1ARM Mali-T760 MP2 ( - 700 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 850
0.4 pt (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
18816 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2042     avg: 2108     median: 2109 (8%)     max: 2168 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2015     avg: 2091     median: 2079 (24%)     max: 2190 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 119     avg: 167.3     median: 178 (8%)     max: 183 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 519     avg: 900     median: 1042 (2%)     max: 1087 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
987 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4986 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 8326.9     avg: 8842     median: 8823 (10%)     max: 9397 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4875     avg: 5426     median: 5454.5 (5%)     max: 5904 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
25 Points (7%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 35     avg: 36.8     median: 36.5 (8%)     max: 39 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 25484     avg: 29469     median: 28792.5 (24%)     max: 34806 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 20787     avg: 28847     median: 28119.5 (23%)     max: 38363 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 20716     avg: 21830     median: 22122.5 (4%)     max: 22360 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 45047     avg: 46029     median: 46132 (17%)     max: 46804 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 119981     avg: 126175     median: 125664 (12%)     max: 133391 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 121238     avg: 133665     median: 133304 (8%)     max: 146815 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 36486     avg: 40832     median: 41451.5 (11%)     max: 43937 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
10533 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
8331 Points (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4894     avg: 5492     median: 5739 (27%)     max: 6065 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5433     avg: 5445     median: 5445 (36%)     max: 5457 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6929     avg: 7021     median: 7021 (35%)     max: 7113 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 254     avg: 264     median: 264 (10%)     max: 274 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 1.9     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0     avg: 1     median: 1.2 (1%)     max: 1.894 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 850 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 00:25:15

#0 checking url part for id 12728 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6615 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.05s ... 0.051s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12728 +0.014s ... 0.065s

#7 got single benchmarks 12728 +0.016s ... 0.081s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6615 +0.003s ... 0.084s

#9 got single benchmarks 6615 +0s ... 0.085s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.063s ... 0.147s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.17s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)