Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 850 vs Mediatek MT8752 vs Mediatek MT6750N

Samsung Exynos 850

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 850

The Samsung Exynos 850 is a System on a Chip (SoC) for entry level smartphones (Android based). It was announced in May 2020 and the first device with it is the Samsung Galaxy A21s. The chip integrates a processor with 8 small ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock with up to 2 GHz (octa core).

The multi threaded performance is quite good thanks to 8 cores, the single threaded performance suffers a bit from the small A55 cores, although the clock rate of up to 2 GHz can help a bit.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE modem (Cat.7 2CA up to 300 MBit/s download, Cat.13 2CA 150 MBit/s upload), a Wi-fi 5 modem (802.11ac), LPPDDR4x memory controller, eMMC 5.1 flash memory controller and a video engine for FHD 60fps encoding and decoding (H.265, H.264, VP9).

It is manufactured in the modern 8nm LPP process at Samsung and should offer a good power efficiency and therefore it is also suited for small smartphones.

Mediatek MT8752

► remove from comparison  MT8752

The MediaTek MT8752 is a ARM based SoC for mostly Android based tablets and smartphones. It integrates 8 small ARM Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.7 GHz. The integrated graphics card is an ARM Mali-T760MP2 with up to 700 MHz clock speed. Furthermore, an LTE modem and a video de- and encoder are integrated in the chip.

Mediatek MT6750N

► remove from comparison  MT6750N

The ARM-based Mediatek MT6750N SoC (System on a Chip) is a mid-range mobile processor for smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It integrates 8 ARM Cortex-A53 cores consisting of 4 high-performance cores clocked at up to 1.5 GHz plus 4 low-power cores clocked at up to 1 GHz each. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a Cat. 6 LTE radio and an ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU with 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity. Compared to the older MT6750, the graphics card seems to be clocked higher.

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the Cortex-A7 and introduces 64-Bit support (ARMv8-ISA). Its performance-per-Watt is significantly higher and is even slightly ahead of the old Cortex-A9. If utilizing all 8 of its cores, the Cortex-A53 can rival competing mobile processes in the high-end class range. However, no practical software has been specifically coded to use all 8 cores at such high performance levels.

In addition to the CPU and GPU cores, the SoC also contains a memory controller and the aforementioned Cat.6 LTE modem (FDD/TDD, DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE) with both 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth. The integrated video engine is able to record and playback 1080p videos at up to 30 FPS in hardware. Cameras are supported at up to 16 MP.

The MT6750 is still manufactured in 28nm and so power efficiency is not on par with modern 14/16nm chips.

ModelSamsung Exynos 850Mediatek MT8752Mediatek MT6750N
SeriesSamsung Mediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A55Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Samsung Exynos 850 « - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A55
Allwinner A5230.48 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A55
UNISOC SC9863A1.2 - 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores512 KB L3 Cortex-A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT67952.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT67651.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT67552 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 « 1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67521.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67531.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67501.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87321.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT81651.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67391.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67321.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67351.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87351.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67371.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT67952.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT67651.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT67552 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87521.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67521.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67531.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N « 1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67501.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87321.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT81651.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67391.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67321.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67351.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87351.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67371.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock <=2000 MHz1700 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology8 nm28 nm28 nm
FeaturesLTE Cat.7 / Cat.13, LPDDR4x RAM, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5), 48 MP Camera, eMMC 5.1, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo4G LTE (Cat. 4), HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, WLAN (2,4 + 5 GHz), Bluetooth, GPS, FM receiver, H.265 Decoder, ARM Mali-T760 MP2 GPUCat. 6 LTE (FDD & TDD), DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE, 802.11a/b/g/n WiFi, Bluetooth, 16 MP ISP, 1080p recording/playback, ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP1ARM Mali-T760 MP2 ( - 700 MHz)ARM Mali-T860 MP2
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 850
0.4 pt (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
18816 Points (16%)
10044 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2042     avg: 2108     median: 2109 (25%)     max: 2168 Points
1031 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2015     avg: 2091     median: 2079 (24%)     max: 2190 Points
1013 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 119     avg: 167.3     median: 178 (8%)     max: 183 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 519     avg: 900     median: 1042 (2%)     max: 1087 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
987 Points (10%)
665 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4986 Points (5%)
2645 Points (3%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 8326.9     avg: 8842     median: 8823 (10%)     max: 9397 ms
14116 ms (17%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4875     avg: 5426     median: 5454.5 (5%)     max: 5904 Points
3274 Points (3%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
25 Points (7%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 35     avg: 36.8     median: 36.5 (8%)     max: 39 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT6750N +
43987 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 25484     avg: 29469     median: 28792.5 (24%)     max: 34806 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 20787     avg: 28847     median: 28119.5 (23%)     max: 38363 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 20716     avg: 21830     median: 22122.5 (4%)     max: 22360 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 45047     avg: 46029     median: 46132 (17%)     max: 46804 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 119981     avg: 126175     median: 125664 (12%)     max: 133391 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 121238     avg: 133665     median: 133304 (8%)     max: 146815 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 36486     avg: 40832     median: 41451.5 (11%)     max: 43937 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
10533 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
8331 Points (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4894     avg: 5492     median: 5739 (27%)     max: 6065 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5433     avg: 5445     median: 5445 (36%)     max: 5457 Points
3138 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6929     avg: 7021     median: 7021 (35%)     max: 7113 Points
3885 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 MT6750N +
1699 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 MT6750N +
2820 Points (6%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 254     avg: 264     median: 264 (10%)     max: 274 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 1.9     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0     avg: 1     median: 1.2 (1%)     max: 1.894 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 850 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6750N → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 02. 18:20:35

#0 checking url part for id 12728 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6615 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10096 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.09s ... 0.091s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.091s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12728 +0.015s ... 0.106s

#8 got single benchmarks 12728 +0.016s ... 0.122s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6615 +0.002s ... 0.125s

#10 got single benchmarks 6615 +0s ... 0.125s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10096 +0.002s ... 0.128s

#12 got single benchmarks 10096 +0.006s ... 0.133s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.133s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.097s ... 0.231s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.231s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)