Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5105 vs Intel Processor N100 vs Intel Processor N200

Intel Celeron N5105

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5105

The Intel Celeron N5105 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive desktops and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5105 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N5105 in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1005G1 and the Ryzen 3 3250U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 10 Watts (mobile and lower clocked N5100 6W). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

Intel Processor N100

► remove from comparison Intel N100

The Intel Processor N100 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with 1 to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

The average N100 in our database delivers unimpressive multi-thread benchmark scores that are most similar to those of the Core i3-1115G4. The chip is fast enough for many day-to-day tasks, but not much more than that; the other thing to keep in mind is that of the two N100-toting systems tested by us as of October 2023, both have rather high CPU power limits. The chip will be noticeably slower if limited to just six or seven Watts.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N100 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Celeron N5105Intel Processor N100Intel Processor N200
CodenameJasper LakeAlder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 « 1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz1000 - 3400 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP10 Watt6 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1338BGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (450 - 800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
$128 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5105
20.7 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N100
24.4 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.7 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 60     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (34%)     max: 61 Points
74%
1 N200 +
45 Points (25%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (4%)     max: 196 Points
47%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2175 Points (2%)
118%
N100 +
min: 1577     avg: 2449     median: 2559.5 (2%)     max: 2983 Points
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
618 Points (26%)
147%
N100 +
min: 747     avg: 885     median: 910.5 (38%)     max: 942 Points
112%
N200 +
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
235 Points (26%)
148%
N100 +
min: 285     avg: 338     median: 347 (38%)     max: 358 Points
113%
N200 +
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
826 Points (2%)
118%
N100 +
min: 590     avg: 934     median: 978.5 (2%)     max: 1139 Points
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
368 Points (2%)
109%
N100 +
min: 246     avg: 384.6     median: 401.5 (3%)     max: 479 Points
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
108.1 Points (30%)
137%
N100 +
min: 118.8     avg: 143.8     median: 147.9 (41%)     max: 155 Points
105%
N200 +
113 Points (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3.84     avg: 4.6     median: 4.2 (5%)     max: 5.99 Points
65%
1 N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1.55     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.87 Points
77%
1 N200 +
1.4 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 4604     avg: 4896     median: 4869 (29%)     max: 5179 Points
81%
1 N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 9608     avg: 12281     median: 11207 (8%)     max: 15336 Points
67%
1 N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 14514     avg: 18829     median: 16948 (11%)     max: 24225 Points
65%
1 N200 +
11030 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 7171     avg: 7699     median: 7750 (9%)     max: 8227 Points
77%
1 N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 481.652     avg: 569     median: 588.3 (7%)     max: 645.884 s
67%
1 N200 +
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 15.795     avg: 16.5     median: 16.2 (3%)     max: 17.7 s
62%
1 N200 +
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2187     avg: 2343     median: 2372 (4%)     max: 2501 Points
89%
1 N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
11153 MIPS (6%)
105%
N100 +
min: 7532     avg: 11072     median: 11663.5 (7%)     max: 13291 MIPS
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3108 MIPS (37%)
118%
N100 +
min: 3046     avg: 3629     median: 3653.5 (43%)     max: 3958 MIPS
104%
N200 +
3230 MIPS (38%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N100 +
min: 20.85     avg: 27.1     median: 24.1 (1%)     max: 34.7 fps
68%
1 N200 +
16.3 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N100 +
min: 101.8     avg: 134.8     median: 121.2 (3%)     max: 173 fps
66%
1 N200 +
80 fps (2%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2 fps (4%)
147%
N100 +
min: 1.72     avg: 2.8     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.49 fps
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N100 +
min: 0.257     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.263 GB/s
110%
1 N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N100 +
min: 0.529     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.538 GB/s
110%
1 N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2.8     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (8%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
110%
1 N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2940 Seconds (37%)
142%
N100 +
min: 1992     avg: 2545     median: 2067 (26%)     max: 3964 Seconds
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1573 Seconds (11%)
131%
N100 +
min: 1017     avg: 1322     median: 1198.5 (8%)     max: 1956 Seconds
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.2 sec (25%)
134%
N100 +
min: 0.822     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 1.06 sec
101%
N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N100 +
min: 4091     avg: 5232     median: 4838 (10%)     max: 6441 Points
81%
1 N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 19.264     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.531 s
103%
1 N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 40.302     avg: 40.5     median: 40.4 (2%)     max: 40.679 s
95%
1 N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 816.966     avg: 836     median: 818.8 (4%)     max: 863.891 s
81%
1 N200 +
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N100 +
min: 9434     avg: 12661     median: 11998 (9%)     max: 15625 Points
79%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4394 Points (11%)
135%
N100 +
min: 3723     avg: 5317     median: 5940 (15%)     max: 6486 Points
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 34828     avg: 42619     median: 41217 (33%)     max: 51063 Points
67%
1 N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 34083     avg: 42751     median: 41809 (34%)     max: 51420 Points
69%
1 N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 50867     avg: 52331     median: 52418.5 (42%)     max: 53373 Points
66%
1 N200 +
34749 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3869 Points (10%)
105%
N100 +
min: 3133     avg: 3959     median: 4061.5 (10%)     max: 4693 Points
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5498 Points (10%)
116%
N100 +
min: 4589     avg: 5806     median: 6371 (11%)     max: 6602 Points
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1643 Points (7%)
125%
N100 +
min: 1407     avg: 1999     median: 2054 (9%)     max: 2519 Points
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
524 Points (13%)
233%
N100 +
min: 1070     avg: 1195     median: 1221.5 (30%)     max: 1245 Points
182%
N200 +
956 Points (23%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
1466 Points (6%)
215%
N100 +
min: 2283     avg: 2937     median: 3157 (12%)     max: 3282 Points
113%
N200 +
1660 Points (6%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 571     avg: 1024     median: 1173 (37%)     max: 1177 Points
73%
1 N200 +
853 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1356     avg: 2544     median: 2846.5 (12%)     max: 3126 Points
48%
1 N200 +
1375 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
653 Points (25%)
151%
N100 +
min: 915     avg: 981     median: 986 (37%)     max: 1018 Points
142%
N200 +
928 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
2080 Points (4%)
136%
N100 +
min: 1911     avg: 2598     median: 2829 (5%)     max: 2896 Points
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
649 Points (3%)
153%
N100 +
min: 968     avg: 990     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1008 Points
137%
N200 +
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2069 Points (7%)
133%
N100 +
min: 2278     avg: 2624     median: 2753 (9%)     max: 2862 Points
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 4278     avg: 4440     median: 4467 (45%)     max: 4549 Points
102%
1 N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 10361     avg: 11002     median: 11197 (11%)     max: 11264 Points
89%
1 N200 +
9989 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1582 ms (2%)
154%
N100 +
min: 1004     avg: 1049     median: 1024.5 (1%)     max: 1122 ms
108%
N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N100 +
50984 Points (37%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
96.2 Points (26%)
140%
1 N100 +
min: 128.3     avg: 133.5     median: 134.3 (37%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
134.2 Points (24%)
127%
N100 +
min: 156.3     avg: 170.5     median: 170.9 (31%)     max: 187.4 Points
128%
N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
531 Points (20%)
148%
N100 +
min: 706     avg: 779     median: 786 (29%)     max: 839 Points
116%
N200 +
614 Points (23%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
24 Watt (4%)
111%
1 N100 +
min: 12.2     avg: 21.2     median: 21.7 (4%)     max: 29.1 Watt
170%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
22.7 Watt (4%)
95%
1 N100 +
min: 12.4     avg: 20.9     median: 24 (4%)     max: 26.1 Watt
167%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2.84     avg: 7.3     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 10.3 Watt
125%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3.92     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (6%)     max: 6.77 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
16.2 Points per Watt (12%)
114%
1 N100 +
min: 17.6     avg: 18.4     median: 18.4 (14%)     max: 19.1 Points per Watt
99%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5105 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N100 → 139% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 95% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 09. 05:51:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13111 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14932 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759981895s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13111 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 13111 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14932 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#11 got single benchmarks 14932 +0.012s ... 0.032s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.035s

#13 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.005s ... 0.04s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.065s ... 0.105s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.105s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)