, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron 6305 vs Intel Pentium Gold 7505

Intel Celeron 6305

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 6305

The Intel Celeron 6305 (or 6305U) is a power efficient dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced in the third quarter of 2020. It integrates only two Willow Cove processor cores (2 threads as no HyperThreading/SMT). The clock speed is set at 1.8 GHz as the chip does not support Turbo Boost. Thanks to the architectural improvements of the CPU cores, the Celeron 6305 should still be faster than the old Comet Lake-U based Celeron 5205U (1.9 GHz, no Turbo).

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It should offer a significantly higher performance compared to the older UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake). In the 6305U Intel calls it just UHD Graphics and it offers 48 EUs.

Other improvements from Ice Lake should be also integrated in Tiger Lake like the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced in the improved 10nm+ process (called 10 nm SuperFin) at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

Intel Pentium Gold 7505

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 7505

The Intel Pentium Gold 7505 is a power-efficient dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced in the third quarter of 2020. Unlike many other TGL-UP3 processors, the Pentium features an Infrastructure Processing Unit (Intel IPU). It integrates two Willow Cove processor cores (4 threads thanks to HyperThreading) clocked at 2 - 3.5 GHz (at 15 Watt TDP).

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics adapter based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It should offer a significantly higher performance compared to the older UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake).

Other improvements from Ice Lake should be also integrated in Tiger Lake like the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced on the second-gen 10 nm Intel SuperFin process that should be comparable to the 7 nm TSMC process (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

Intel Celeron 6305Intel Pentium Gold 7505
Intel Tiger LakeIntel Tiger Lake
Tiger Lake UTiger Lake U
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake U
Intel Pentium Gold 75052 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
» Intel Celeron 63051.8 GHz2 / 24 MB
Intel Celeron 6205 compare2 / 24 MB
» Intel Pentium Gold 75052 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Celeron 63051.8 GHz2 / 24 MB
Intel Celeron 6205 compare2 / 24 MB
1800 MHz2000 - 3500 MHz
160 KB160 KB
2.5 MB2.5 MB
4 MB4 MB
2 / 22 / 4
15 15
10 10
BGA1499BGA1499
Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), Thunderbolt 4, DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4x-3733AVX2, DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4x-3700
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Intel Tiger Lake Celeron 6305Intel Tiger Lake Pentium 7505

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1093 (58%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2326 (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Gold 7505 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 24. 14:58:39

#0 checking url part for id 12244 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12234 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12244 +0s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 12244 +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12234 +0s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 12234 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.014s

#12 return log +0.003s ... 0.017s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)