Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 720 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644

Qualcomm Adreno 720

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 720

The Adreno 720 is a graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which was first used in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 was installed. The chip was introduced at the end of 2023 and is primarily used in Android-based upper mid-range devices.

HDR gaming with 10-bit color depth is possible with the graphics chip, and the Adreno 720 also supports the APIs OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP and Vulkan 1.3.

The GPU is capable of driving WFHD+ displays at up to 168 Hz and 4K displays at 60 Hz and offers support for HDR10+, HLG and Dolby Vision.

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 720Qualcomm Adreno 644
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 722 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement17.11.2024 07.05.2021
PredecessorAdreno 642
CPU in Adreno 720GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 38 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 488     avg: 501     median: 493 (1%)     max: 523 Points
275 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 5434     avg: 5608     median: 5496 (3%)     max: 6006 Points
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1451     avg: 1495     median: 1473.5 (2%)     max: 1583 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6876     avg: 7435     median: 7435 (31%)     max: 7994 Points
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (26%)     max: 6466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 9728     avg: 10399     median: 10398.5 (26%)     max: 11069 Points
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (17%)     max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 11.8     median: 12 (4%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 23     avg: 25.8     median: 26.5 (5%)     max: 27 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 57     avg: 64     median: 66 (5%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 48     avg: 52.5     median: 52.5 (5%)     max: 57 fps
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 84     avg: 88.3     median: 84 (2%)     max: 97 fps
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 107     avg: 115.7     median: 109 (5%)     max: 131 fps
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 720
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 174     avg: 188.7     median: 178 (1%)     max: 214 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
236226 Points (24%)
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 218125     avg: 250193     median: 259729 (18%)     max: 272724 Points
170281 Points (12%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 60.7     avg: 67.9     median: 67.9 (2%)     max: 75.09 fps
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 3465     avg: 3537     median: 3536.5 (1%)     max: 3608 Points
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 4066     avg: 4106     median: 4105.5 (1%)     max: 4145 Points
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 24724     avg: 27187     median: 27186.5 (9%)     max: 29649 Points
30029 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 37697     avg: 43989     median: 43989 (58%)     max: 50281 Points
42541 Points (56%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.17     avg: 7     median: 7 (3%)     max: 8.88 Watt
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 720 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 73% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 644:
42  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 644:
45  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 720:
52.6  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 720:
40.1 50.1 ~ 45 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 720:
57.7 59.2 ~ 58 fps
103%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
Adreno 644:
40  fps
high
100%
Adreno 720:
39.6 57.5 ~ 49 fps
82%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 720:
38.7  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 720 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 93%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 93%

Qualcomm Adreno 720Qualcomm Adreno 644
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal4245
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile584938.7604040
Dead Trigger 260
Subway Surfers61
Qualcomm Adreno 720Qualcomm Adreno 644
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





1


1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


1
3

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 19. 22:06:05

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12490 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1766178365s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Dec 2025 14:52:56 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.022s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.022s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12490 +0.018s ... 0.04s

#9 got single benchmarks 12490 +0.009s ... 0.049s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0s ... 0.049s

#11 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.008s ... 0.058s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.061s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.091s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.091s

#16 Got 23 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.096s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.096s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.097s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.1s

#20 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.1s

#21 return log +0.001s ... 0.101s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)