, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619L

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 619L

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 619L
ManufacturerQualcommQualcomm
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 642
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 642
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology5 nm8 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement07.05.2021 15.12.2015
ArchitectureAdreno 600
DirectXDirectX 12.1
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5587 Points (33%)
min: 3122     avg: 3225     median: 3224.5 (19%)     max: 3327 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
8380 Points (20%)
min: 3307     avg: 3311     median: 3311 (8%)     max: 3315 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
4478 Points (46%)
min: 2308     avg: 2328     median: 2328 (24%)     max: 2348 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
6148 Points (24%)
min: 2120     avg: 2154     median: 2153.5 (8%)     max: 2187 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
153 fps (1%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
min: 72     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (1%)     max: 73 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
90 fps (3%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
min: 54     avg: 56     median: 56 (2%)     max: 58 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
90 fps (10%)
min: 36     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (4%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
79 fps (22%)
min: 30     avg: 31.5     median: 31.5 (9%)     max: 33 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
26 fps (17%)
min: 8     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (5%)     max: 8.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
18 fps (7%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
42 fps (20%)
min: 13     avg: 13.5     median: 13.5 (7%)     max: 14 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
50 fps (9%)
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (3%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
40 fps (0%)
min: 14     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (0%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
35 fps (1%)
min: 12     avg: 12.5     median: 12.5 (0%)     max: 13 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
48 fps (2%)
min: 22.78     avg: 22.8     median: 22.8 (1%)     max: 22.85 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
30131 Points (30%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
17916 Points (40%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 41% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
Adreno 619L:
60 fps  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 642:
30 fps  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 642:
60 fps  fps
67%
Adreno 619L:
39 fps 40 fps ~ 40 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 642:
59 fps  fps
68%
Adreno 619L:
40 fps 40 fps ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 642:
60 fps  fps
50%
Adreno 619L:
30 fps 30 fps ~ 30 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 642:
40 fps  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 619L:
60 fps  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 642:
60 fps  fps
high
100%
Adreno 642:
60 fps  fps
48%
Adreno 619L:
29 fps  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 619L:
60 fps  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 58%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 67%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 28. 03:11:53

#0 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:22:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.045s ... 0.045s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.045s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.024s ... 0.069s

#8 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.005s ... 0.075s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0s ... 0.075s

#10 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.006s ... 0.081s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.081s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.089s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.089s

#14 Got 17 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.094s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.094s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.094s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.1s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.1s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.103s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)