Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-2367M vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

Intel Core i3-2367M

► remove from comparison Intel 2367M

The Intel Core i3-2367M is a power efficient ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) processor for thin and light laptops. The base frequency of 1.4 GHz is relatively low and the CPU does not support Turbo Boost for automatic overclocking. Due to HyperThreading, the i7-2367M is able to handle 4 threads in parallel. Compared to similar clocked Celeron and Pentium models, the i3 features the faster HD 3000 graphics card and offers more enabled features (like Quick Sync). However, compared to the expensive i7 CPUs, the i3 lacks VT-d, Trusted Execution and VPro support.

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most notable improvements is the improved Turbo 2.0 (not used for the processing cores in the i3-2367M) and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 clocked at 350 or 1000 MHz (Turbo Boost). Due to the slower clock rate without the Turbo, compared to HD Graphics 3000 in 35W and 45W processors (usually clocked at 650 base speed in non LV processors), the performance should be noticeable lower.

The performance of the CPU should be a bit higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i3 ULV and therefore faster than the 1.33 GHz Core i3-380UM. The average performance of the CPU part should therefore be similar to the AMD A4-3300M.

The TDP of 17W (includes the integrated GPU and memory controller) allows the use of the 2367M CPU in small subnotebooks.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

► remove from comparison Intel T9500

The Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. It was intended to be used in the Santa Rosa platform due to the 800 MHz FSB. The T9550 is only slightly higher clocked but offers already a FSB1066.

Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9500 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. 

The T9500 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).

ModelIntel Core i3-2367MIntel Core 2 Duo T9500
CodenameSandy BridgePenryn
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core 2 Duo
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core i3-2370M compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2350M compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2348M compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2330M compare2.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2328M compare2.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2312M compare2.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2310M compare2.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2308M compare2.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2377M compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2375M compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2367M « 1.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2365M compare1.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-2357M compare1.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 « 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1400 MHz2600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB6 MB
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt
Transistors624 Million410 Million
Technology32 nm45 nm
Die Size149 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1023BGA479, PGA478, PPGA478
FeaturesHD Graphics 3000 (350-1000MHz), DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 8GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationVirtualization Technolgoy (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 3000 (350 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
FSB800
Voltage1.0-1.25V V
$530 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 2367M +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.35 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 2367M +
min: 0.53     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.56 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1789     avg: 1823     median: 1826.5 (11%)     max: 1856 Points
min: 2659     avg: 2927     median: 2950 (18%)     max: 3208 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3701     avg: 4046     median: 4107.5 (3%)     max: 4168 Points
min: 5094     avg: 5441     median: 5419 (4%)     max: 5885 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 2367M +
min: 4695     avg: 4889     median: 4918 (3%)     max: 5048 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 2367M +
min: 2198     avg: 2262     median: 2275 (3%)     max: 2293 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 2367M +
min: 1133     avg: 1207     median: 1241 (15%)     max: 1246 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 2367M +
min: 36.4     avg: 39     median: 39.2 (8%)     max: 41.33 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 2367M +
1132 s (4%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 2367M +
36.2 s (19%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 2367M +
min: 1535     avg: 1537     median: 1536.5 (2%)     max: 1538 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 2367M +
min: 7.33     avg: 7.4     median: 7.4 (0%)     max: 7.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 2367M +
min: 39     avg: 40.5     median: 40.5 (1%)     max: 41.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 2367M +
min: 0.061     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.063 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 2367M +
min: 0.101     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.111 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 2367M +
min: 0.118     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.126 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1609     avg: 1876     median: 1689 (4%)     max: 3246 Points
min: 2273     avg: 2374     median: 2352 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27.4     avg: 27.5     median: 27.4 (6%)     max: 27.59 s
min: 17     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.1     avg: 61.5     median: 61.5 (3%)     max: 62 s
min: 42     avg: 43.5     median: 43.5 (2%)     max: 45 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1396     avg: 1405     median: 1404 (6%)     max: 1416 s
min: 1126     avg: 1196     median: 1195.5 (5%)     max: 1265 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
27570 MIPS (13%)
23933 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
17080 MFLOPS (13%)
19062 MFLOPS (15%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T9500 +
min: 5765     avg: 6306     median: 6334 (13%)     max: 6668 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9500 +
5.5 Points (79%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 2367M +
min: 5.1     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (67%)     max: 5.2 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 2367M +
min: 4231     avg: 4406     median: 4357.5 (3%)     max: 4609 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-2367M → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 → 131% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 02. 07:46:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2986 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 376 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759383968s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 Oct 2025 05:17:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2986 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 2986 +0.011s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 376 +0s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 376 +0.003s ... 0.021s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.034s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.036s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)