OnePlus Nord N100
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, videos @1080p/30fps
Pricecompare
Average of 6 scores (from 9 reviews)
Reviews for the OnePlus Nord N100
OnePlus's most affordable phone so far is naturally expected to set standards in its class again. However, you have to do without many OnePlus features for just under 200 Euros (~$242), and the competition is strong. Is the Nord N100 still recommendable?
Source: PC Mag
The OnePlus Nord N100 hits a desperately needed sweet spot for budget phone shoppers. It impresses with solid performance, a bright and vivid display, and long battery life. On the flip side, its cameras are mediocre, LTE band support could be better, and the thin plastic backplate feels cheap.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority Archive.org version
The OnePlus Nord N100 aims to deliver good value for money. With a big battery, 90Hz panel, and Oxygen OS, it's a decent attempt to keep up with the competition. However, to achieve this, it heavily compromises its camera, design, and performance. Ultimately, there are better options out there that won't need replacing as quickly.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 60% performance: 40% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→EN
Positive: Excellent display; long battery life; good speakers; nice cameras; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2021
Source: Pplware PT→EN
Positive: Long battery life; high performance; nice display; stylish design; good price. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/15/2021
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 62%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN
Positive: Modern design; great built quality; nice display; good speakers; long battery life; quick charging; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2021
Source: Antyweb PL→EN
Positive: Nice display; long battery life; great main camera; good stereo speakers. Negative: No NFC; weak processor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/29/2021
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 78% features: 72% mobility: 85% workmanship: 79%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 66%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 460: Lower mainstream octa-core with four big ARM Cortex-A73 and four small ARM Cortex-A53 SoC cores clocked at up to 1.8 GHz. Futhermore integrates and the Adreno 510 GPU, a LPDDR4X-3733 dual channel memory controller as well as an X1 LTE (Cat. 13 / 12) modem.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.52":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.OnePlus:
The Chinese smartphone manufacturer Shenzhen OnePlus Science & Technology Co., Ltd. was founded in 2013. In 2014, it launched its first smartphone. It is a subsidiary of BBK Electronic Corporation, a giant Chinese electronics group that also includes Oppo, Vivo and Realme. OnePlus specializes in the development and production of smartphones and other electronic devices such as headphones and smartwatches.
70.37%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.