Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-12900 vs Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i9-12900

► remove from comparison  i9-12900

The Intel Core i9-12900 is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.1 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.8 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 65 W base power and 202 Watt maximum Turbo power. It is manufactured in 10nm, called Intel 7, process at Intel.

Intel Core i5-8500

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8500

The Intel Core i5-8500 is a mid-range 6-core CPU. The processor belongs to the Coffee Lake generation and was presented in April 2018. It does not support Hyper-Threading, which means it can run six threads simultaneously. The base clock rate is 3 GHz and the CPU can speed up to 4.1 GHz under high load. Despite belonging to the new generation of CPUs, the Core i5-8500 is manufactured in an improved 14nm process.

Performance

The processor offers a strong performance increase compared to the Core i5-7500 due to its two additional cores. Single-core performance has not improved significantly compared to its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a mid-range model, the Core i5-8500 should be suitable for demanding games and programs.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50-100 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

ModelIntel Core i9-12900Intel Core i5-8500
CodenameAlder LakeCoffee Lake-S
Series Alder Lake-SIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-S
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 « 2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8086K compare3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K compare3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700 compare3.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500 « 3 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400 compare2.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Clock2400 - 5100 MHz3000 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache1.4 MB384 KB
L2 Cache14 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 246 / 6
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
Die Size215 mm2
SocketLGA 1700FCLGA1151
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$489 U.S.$202 U.S.
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900
39.8 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18628 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1825 Points (77%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
703 Points (77%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7179 Points (18%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3299 Points (21%)
950 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
262 Points (73%)
172 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
39 Points (50%)
10.2 Points (13%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (75%)
2 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8949 Points (54%)
8606 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
68729 Points (50%)
40829 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
107565 Points (69%)
39357 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14610 Points (18%)
8515 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
211.8 s (3%)
848 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
26.5 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10739 Points (17%)
4219 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
50152 MIPS (29%)
23200 MIPS (13%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5979 MIPS (70%)
4513 MIPS (53%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
147.5 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
310 fps (8%)
206.5 fps (5%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
14.4 fps (25%)
7.9 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.9 GB/s (56%)
0.5 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.4 GB/s (59%)
0.9 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
17.2 GB/s (45%)
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
262.7 Seconds (2%)
494.8 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
17464 Points (37%)
9903 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 i5-8500 +
9.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 i5-8500 +
20.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 i5-8500 +
541 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
78877 Points (61%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
24314 Points (60%)
7942 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
74061 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
73871 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19775 Points (50%)
7782 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
35153 Points (63%)
11691 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
15095 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2500 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
13100 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1656 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
8924 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1638 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8845 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6991 Points (70%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
36310 Points (36%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i5-8500 +
4782 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i5-8500 +
18025 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
602 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
269 Points (48%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1785 Points (67%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
151 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
206 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.7 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
16 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900 → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8500 → 46% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 03. 04:44:31

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14150 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11246 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759459471s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 02 Oct 2025 12:30:24 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14150 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14150 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11246 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 11246 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.032s ... 0.05s

#13 return log +0.023s ... 0.073s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)