Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10910 vs Intel Core i3-10320

Intel Core i9-10910

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10910

The Intel Core i9-10910 is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.0 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.6 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.0 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

Intel Core i3-10320

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10320

The Intel Core i3-10320 is an entry level quad-core desktop processor based on the Comet Lake-S architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.8 and 4.6 GHz and can execute up to eight threads with its four cores simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The performance is similar to the old high end Intel Core i7-7700K due to the same architecture and similar clock speeds. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 90 Watt are consumed (PL2 for 28s).

ModelIntel Core i9-10910Intel Core i3-10320
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-S
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 « 3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-109103.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 « 3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3600 - 5000 MHz3800 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache20 MB7.9 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 204 / 8
TDP125 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1200LGA 1200
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$488 U.S.$162 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Comet Lake i3-10320

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10910
51.4 pt (58%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10320
38.9 pt (44%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5986 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1185 Points (52%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
501 Points (58%)
458 Points (53%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5196 Points (22%)
2320 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2302 Points (24%)
949 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
215 Points (66%)
188 Points (57%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25.6 Points (36%)
10.5 Points (15%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (8%)
2.1 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8131 Points (66%)
7164 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57842 Points (65%)
28383 Points (32%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
243.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.8 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8613 Points (50%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60747 MIPS (38%)
25864 MIPS (16%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5690 MIPS (68%)
4899 MIPS (59%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
58.8 fps (21%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (51%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.8 fps (36%)
8.2 fps (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
208 Seconds (1%)
469 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
0.6 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9911 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
9.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
432.5 s (2%)
516 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18348 Points (51%)
10518 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63063 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9675 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25520 Points (47%)
13564 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11771 Points (58%)
4368 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1381 Points (60%)
1217 Points (53%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10244 Points (36%)
4846 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
737 ms (1%)
784 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
160 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
55976 Points (58%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
236 Points (60%)
224 Points (57%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1254 Points (48%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
115 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
96.3 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.9 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10910 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10320 → 72% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 30. 09:51:38

#0 checking url part for id 12832 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14009 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 30 Jan 2023 08:57:14 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12832 +0.012s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 12832 +0.008s ... 0.04s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14009 +0.012s ... 0.052s

#9 got single benchmarks 14009 +0.007s ... 0.06s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.06s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.144s ... 0.203s

#12 return log +0.027s ... 0.23s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)