Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8700 vs Intel Core i3-N300

Intel Core i7-8700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8700

The Intel Core i7-8700 is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.2 and 4.6 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the slightly higher clocked Core i7-8700K, the i7-8700 offers a lower TDP and no unlocked multiplier (no easy overclocking).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to the previous quad-core Kaby Lake models. Single-core performance has not improved much. As a high-end model, the i7-8700 is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

Intel Core i3-N300

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N300

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz (single core, 3 GHz all core Turbo). The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance depends on the cooling and TDP settings and should be somewhere similar to the old  Alder Lake Pentium 8500 (1 performance core, 4 efficiency cores, max. 4.4 GHz and 8 MB L3-cache). The multi-threaded performance should be quite good with the 8 cores but will suffer due to the low TDP. Single thread performance will suffer due to the missing P-cores and relatively low boost clock speeds.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 7 W and is therefore even suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Core i7-8700Intel Core i3-N300
CodenameCoffee Lake-SAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i7-8086K compare3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K compare3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700 « 3.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500 compare3 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400 compare2.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 « - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock3200 - 4600 MHz <=3800 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP65 Watt7 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
SocketFCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N300
19 pt (32%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
34 Points (19%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
165 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2546 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
513 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 i3-N300 +
195 Points (21%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 i3-N300 +
968 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1167     avg: 1194     median: 1199 (8%)     max: 1215 Points
416 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 190     avg: 193     median: 192 (53%)     max: 197 Points
85 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 12.9     avg: 13     median: 13 (17%)     max: 13.04 Points
5.3 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (52%)     max: 2.18 Points
1 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6992     avg: 7140     median: 7171 (43%)     max: 7257 Points
2884 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 34532     avg: 36153     median: 35384 (26%)     max: 38543 Points
12014 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
43704 Points (28%)
18450 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9187 Points (11%)
4497 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 143.7     avg: 198.4     median: 198.4 (2%)     max: 253.1 s
531 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 5.469     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 8.061 s
17.5 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 5912     avg: 6252     median: 6332 (10%)     max: 6511 Points
1915 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 i3-N300 +
11976 MIPS (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2403 MIPS (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 70.9     avg: 75.7     median: 75.2 (2%)     max: 81.1 fps
28.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 221.6     avg: 230.6     median: 234.6 (6%)     max: 235.5 fps
106.6 fps (3%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.5 fps (17%)
3.2 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.74     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (23%)     max: 0.822 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.7 (20%)     max: 7.7 GB/s
2.6 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2147 Seconds (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
388.2 Seconds (3%)
1095 Seconds (8%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
1.3 sec (29%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 8738     avg: 10526     median: 11193 (24%)     max: 11646 Points
4261 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.126     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.4 s
33.2 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.11     avg: 18.4     median: 18.5 (1%)     max: 18.6 s
69.1 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 460.1     avg: 469.3     median: 472.2 (2%)     max: 475.7 s
1381 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
45569 Points (35%)
15263 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13159     avg: 13302     median: 13310 (33%)     max: 13436 Points
4983 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
64904 Points (53%)
28114 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
64897 Points (53%)
28073 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
63875 Points (51%)
28903 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 11130     avg: 11692     median: 11885 (30%)     max: 12060 Points
4049 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16818     avg: 17487     median: 17458 (31%)     max: 18184 Points
5528 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 6755     avg: 6874     median: 6873.5 (29%)     max: 6992 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
762 Points (19%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2803 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
734 Points (23%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2641 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1170 Points (46%)
626 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
6250 Points (11%)
2674 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
616 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2642 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5565 Points (56%)
2913 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
23220 Points (23%)
9894 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 21806     avg: 23062     median: 23061.5 (41%)     max: 24317 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 4484     avg: 4486     median: 4486 (59%)     max: 4488 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 22753     avg: 23926     median: 23925.5 (37%)     max: 25098 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 4703     avg: 4709     median: 4708.5 (71%)     max: 4714 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
986 ms (1%)
1638 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 i7-8700 +
64.5 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 i3-N300 +
104.3 Points (19%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 i3-N300 +
529 Points (20%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-8700 +
112.3 Watt (19%)
460%
1 i3-N300 +
24.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-8700 +
112.8 Watt (21%)
508%
1 i3-N300 +
22.2 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
14.7 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 i7-8700 +
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8700 → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N300 → 39% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 11. 13:11:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9932 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14928 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757589073s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:38:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9932 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 9932 +0.007s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14928 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 14928 +0.005s ... 0.021s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.045s ... 0.066s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.069s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)