Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-1270P vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100

Intel Core i7-1270P

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1270P

The Intel Core i7-1270P is a higher-end Alder Lake-P family CPU, an expensive 28 W part meant for use in ultra-light, ultra-thin (yet actively cooled) laptops. This CPU was announced in early 2022 and it has 4 performance cores as opposed to the 6 cores of the top-of-the-line 1280P (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for a total of 16 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock speeds range from 2.2 GHz to 4.8 GHz for the performance cluster and 1.6 GHz to 3.5 GHz for the efficient cluster. Full vPro feature set is supported by this Core i7 ("Enterprise" tier, allowing for remote device management). Its shortcomings as compared with the mighty i7-1280P include the smaller L3 cache, lower core count, lower clock speeds; the performance is slated to be significantly lower as a result.

A brief look at the specifications instantly reveals this i7 series chip to be very similar to the Core i5-12600H, a more power-hungry processor targeted at gaming laptops.

Architecture

The i7 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "little" Alder Lake core is supposed to be as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of an Intel Core i7-1270P's CPU cores enjoy access to 18 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200. Intel suggests using no more than 64 GB, for reference. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, Core i7-1270P comes with Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). PCI-Express 5.0 support has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. Four PCI-Express 4 lanes allow for a read/write rate of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

The 12 CPU cores are not just able to outshine any outgoing quad-core Tiger Lake part, the i7-1195G7 included. The average 1270P in our database directly competes with the Ryzen 7 5825U, the Ryzen 7 7730U and the Ryzen 7 7735U, meaning this little Core i7 is fast enough to make most consumers happy as of mid 2023.

The fairly high processing power comes at a cost. A single Golden Cove core can consume more than 20 W when under heavy load. Your mileage may thus vary depending on how high the Power Limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 96 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.40 GHz has seen no change from what was built into the 11th Gen Tiger Lake-UP3 processors, like an i7-1165G7, which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features such as AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support. Up to 4 monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU. We expect the gaming performance to be reasonably close to that of NVIDIA's MX350.

In other words, the Xe is good enough for most games at 1080p resolution / Medium settings, provided the Power Limits are high enough and the cooling solution is competent enough. Fast RAM is a prerequisite for decent performance as well (the Xe has to make do with no dedicated video memory).

Last but not the least, we discovered that the GPU utilization when playing YouTube UHD 2160p60 videos is higher than it was with Tiger Lake chips.

Power consumption

The i7's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP or Power Limit 1) is 28 W, with 64 W being its maximum Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2). As for the "Minimum Assured" power consumption, Intel's guidelines mention 20 W. All in all, an active cooling solution is a must for such a chip.

The CPU is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency. It's still a rather power-hungry CPU; a single P-core will happily consume more than 20 W when under heavy load. A couple of the higher-end 7 nm U-class AMD Ryzen 5000 chips are not nearly as power-hungry while delivering similar or higher performance levels.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-46-100

The Snapdragon X Plus 8-core (X1P-46-100) is a relatively affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops that was unveiled in Sep 2024. This Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 4.0 GHz, along with the 2.1 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and they reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 however it does not appear to support eGPUs as of September 2024.

The X1P-46-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

A lot depends on the power targets of a specific system, just like it is with AMD, Intel and Nvidia products. That being said, we fully expect the X1P-46-100 to be just a little faster than the Core i5-1245U when executing multi-threaded x86 code.

The 4.0 GHz clock speed is only achievable in single-thread workloads. When executing multi-threaded tasks, the CPU cores will run at no more than 3.4 GHz.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 2.1 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little graphics adapter has much fewer unified shaders at its disposal. Its gaming performance is set to be sufficient for pre-2021 games at resolutions such as 1600x900 on low graphics settings.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for better-than-average power efficiency, as of H2 2024.

ModelIntel Core i7-1270PQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100
CodenameAlder Lake-POryon
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Intel Core i7-1280P compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1270P « 1.6 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260P compare1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1250P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1220P compare1.1 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE compare3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 compare - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 « - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 compare - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 compare - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock1600 - 4800 MHz <=4000 MHz
L1 Cache1.1 MB2.3 MB
L2 Cache10 MB12 MB
L3 Cache18 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 168 / 8 4.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP28 Watt30 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, Rem. Platf. Erase, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1400 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1270P
34.6 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8426     avg: 9718     median: 9718 (9%)     max: 11010 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1552     avg: 1620     median: 1620 (68%)     max: 1688 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 595     avg: 611     median: 611 (67%)     max: 627 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3167     avg: 3536     median: 3536 (9%)     max: 3905 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1695     avg: 1739     median: 1739 (11%)     max: 1783 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 226     avg: 229.5     median: 229.5 (64%)     max: 233 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.9 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.7 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7886 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36271 Points (26%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
344.6 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
9.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16497 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 38099     avg: 38274     median: 38274 (22%)     max: 38449 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4874     avg: 5279     median: 5279 (62%)     max: 5684 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.56     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (18%)     max: 11.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.1 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.8 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
714 Seconds (9%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 372     avg: 373.5     median: 373.5 (3%)     max: 375 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4926     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.575 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
436.4 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10981     avg: 12323     median: 12323 (30%)     max: 13665 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9451     avg: 9958     median: 9958 (25%)     max: 10465 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18221     avg: 18284     median: 18283.5 (33%)     max: 18346 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5316     avg: 6022     median: 6021.5 (25%)     max: 6727 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1564     avg: 1644     median: 1644 (64%)     max: 1724 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8610     avg: 8660     median: 8660 (16%)     max: 8710 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1683 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8537 Points (27%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 537     avg: 541     median: 540.5 (1%)     max: 544 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
78273 Points (59%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
251 Points (69%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 279     avg: 285     median: 285 (51%)     max: 291 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1585     avg: 1649     median: 1648.5 (62%)     max: 1712 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 47.3     avg: 53.2     median: 53.2 (9%)     max: 59.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.3     avg: 63.1     median: 63.1 (12%)     max: 64.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 27.5     avg: 27.6     median: 27.6 (21%)     max: 27.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1270P → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 14. 23:44:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14062 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18002 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752529447s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14062 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 14062 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18002 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 18002 +0s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.036s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.039s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)