Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12700 vs AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Intel Core i7-12700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a fast eight-core desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in November 2021. The processor offers a base clock of 3.3 GHz and reaches up to 4.9 GHz in Turbo. In the same way, the Intel Core i7-12700K the Core i7-12700F is based on a hybrid architecture of 8P and 4E cores. The innovations of the Alder Lake-S processor compared to Rocket Lake, together with the smaller 10 nm manufacturing process, are clearly noticeable. The Intel Core i7-12700 does not offer a free multiplier, which means that overclocking is not possible.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-11700 , performance has been increased with a better IPC. The additional e-cores are also clearly noticeable in multi-threaded applications. Overall, this provides a noticeable performance boost, which also has an effect on all application areas. The 4 E-Cores provide the P-Cores with significantly more power. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0can increase the clock rate of the P-Cores to up to 4.9 GHz. The E-cores also offer a turbo and clock up to 3.6 GHz.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. However, with the Intel UHD Graphics 770 there is only a simple iGPU which is only suitable for office use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-12700 is 65 watts, with the option to consume up to 180 watts in Turbo mode. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be achieved permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7800X3D

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a high-end desktop processor from the Raphael series with 8 Zen 4 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), allowing it to handle up to 16 threads simultaneously. After its announcement in January 2023 at CES in Las Vegas, it was launched in April 2023. Following the launch of the two top models, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, the third model was introduced, which offers significantly more gaming performance with the 3D V-Cache.

The CPU cores have a base clock of 4.2 GHz and can be boosted up to 5 GHz (single-core turbo). The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D features a CCD with 8 cores, which includes the fast 3D V-Cache. This differs significantly from the two Ryzen 9 models, as they have two CCDs, but only one of them can utilize the 3D V-Cache.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is consistently good, although its multi-threaded performance suffers a bit due to the eight native compute cores. However, the real strength of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D lies in gaming performance, where it excels. In tests, we see consistently high gaming performance, even surpassing that of an Intel Core i9-13900K.

In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D aligns with the other two models featuring 3D V-Cache, making the 8-core processor extremely power-efficient. In numbers, this means that the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is specified with a TDP of up to 120 watts. The PPT (Package Power Tracking) is also rated up to 162 watts. For comparison, an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is specified with 170 watts (TDP) or 230 watts (PPT).

ModelIntel Core i7-12700AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
CodenameAlder LakeRaphael (Zen4)
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
Series: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 compare3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D « 4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X compare4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz4200 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache12 MB8 MB
L3 Cache25 MB96 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 208 / 16
TDP65 Watt120 Watt
Technology10 nm5 nm
Die Size215 mm2193 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C89 °C
SocketLGA 1700AM5 (LGA 1718)
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$349 U.S.$449 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.de
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors6570 Million
Voltage1.1 - 1.2 V
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700
41.2 pt (69%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7800X3D
42.3 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
21751 Points (20%)
min: 16688     avg: 17197     median: 16817 (16%)     max: 18086 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1894 Points (77%)
min: 1646     avg: 1726     median: 1713 (70%)     max: 1820 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
731 Points (80%)
min: 663     avg: 686     median: 686 (75%)     max: 709 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8338 Points (20%)
min: 6488     avg: 6805     median: 6804.5 (17%)     max: 7121 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3151 Points (20%)
min: 2783     avg: 2879     median: 2878.5 (18%)     max: 2974 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
272 Points (75%)
min: 272     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (78%)     max: 291 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
36.9 Points (48%)
33.5 Points (43%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (78%)
3.4 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9171 Points (55%)
8026 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60892 Points (44%)
51950 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
103354 Points (66%)
94035 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15091 Points (18%)
14485 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
272.8 s (3%)
62.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.9 s (1%)
2.4 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9328 Points (15%)
16585 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
78331 MIPS (45%)
min: 75558     avg: 80313     median: 80312.5 (46%)     max: 85067 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6292 MIPS (74%)
min: 7412     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (92%)     max: 8235 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
172.4 fps (4%)
169.3 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
347 fps (9%)
344 fps (9%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
25.5 fps (45%)
min: 22.1     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (41%)     max: 24.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (44%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.7 GB/s (47%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.5 GB/s (38%)
15.3 GB/s (40%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
242 Seconds (3%)
min: 266     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (4%)     max: 299 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
151 Seconds (1%)
min: 169     avg: 178     median: 178 (1%)     max: 187 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
min: 0.4152     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4479 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15390 Points (33%)
16892 Points (36%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
7.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
15.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
400.4 s (2%)
337.6 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
72464 Points (56%)
97391 Points (75%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
27022 Points (67%)
min: 30767     avg: 32947     median: 32947 (81%)     max: 35127 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
86815 Points (71%)
89617 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
86587 Points (70%)
89287 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
96264 Points (77%)
91846 Points (74%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
23193 Points (59%)
25510 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
34681 Points (62%)
min: 30333     avg: 31455     median: 30687 (55%)     max: 33345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
16400 Points (69%)
min: 10908     avg: 12327     median: 11975 (50%)     max: 14098 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2602 Points (60%)
2634 Points (61%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
13519 Points (52%)
14288 Points (55%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2175 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12046 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1924 Points (65%)
min: 1856     avg: 1934     median: 1920 (65%)     max: 2027 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
14961 Points (27%)
min: 12073     avg: 13013     median: 12715 (23%)     max: 14252 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1845 Points (8%)
1938 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14883 Points (47%)
13888 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8059 Points (80%)
9097 Points (91%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
52676 Points (52%)
54840 Points (54%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
508 ms (1%)
min: 487     avg: 504     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 520 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
268 Points (70%)
282 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
314 Points (56%)
353 Points (63%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2016 Points (75%)
2216 Points (83%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
327 Watt (56%)
218 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
284 Watt (52%)
207 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
82.7 Watt (55%)
121.6 Watt (80%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
14.4 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700 → 100% n=50

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D → 108% n=50

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 24. 08:43:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14995 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15064 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761288221s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:39:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14995 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 14995 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15064 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 15064 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.05s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)