Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 730 vs Samsung Xclipse 940

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 730

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 730

The Qualcomm Adreno 730 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SoC. The chip will be available starting early 2022 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. 

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 730 GPU offers a 30% improved performance thanks to 30% more ALUs over the Adreno 660, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 888 SoC.  Thanks to the new 4nm process, the power efficiency should also be improved.

The Adreno 730 supports Vulkan 1.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. 

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 730Samsung Xclipse 940
Xclipse 900 Series
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement18.01.2022 30.11.2021 09.10.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 730GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 555 MHz
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
min: 1067     avg: 11770     median: 11974 (52%)     max: 15306 Points
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
min: 15268     avg: 24195     median: 25285 (56%)     max: 27751 Points
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (42%)     max: 9105 Points
min: 5983     avg: 10709     median: 10618 (53%)     max: 13386 Points
min: 15675     avg: 16063     median: 16063 (80%)     max: 16451 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (37%)     max: 14680 Points
min: 11082     avg: 17815     median: 18581 (56%)     max: 20955 Points
min: 23545     avg: 24333     median: 24333 (73%)     max: 25121 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
min: 6483     avg: 10241     median: 10384 (5%)     max: 11201 Points
min: 12652     avg: 12875     median: 12875 (6%)     max: 13098 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
min: 1567     avg: 2534     median: 2549 (3%)     max: 2899 Points
min: 3933     avg: 4084     median: 4084 (5%)     max: 4235 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (5%)
min: 13     avg: 19.7     median: 20 (8%)     max: 23 fps
min: 32     avg: 33     median: 33 (13%)     max: 34 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
min: 19     avg: 41     median: 41.5 (8%)     max: 52 fps
min: 69     avg: 72     median: 72 (13%)     max: 75 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
min: 60     avg: 103.8     median: 101 (7%)     max: 138 fps
min: 153     avg: 164.5     median: 164.5 (12%)     max: 176 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (8%)     max: 72 fps
min: 50     avg: 84.6     median: 84 (9%)     max: 108 fps
min: 131     avg: 135     median: 135 (15%)     max: 139 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
min: 95     avg: 142.6     median: 136 (3%)     max: 189 fps
min: 214     avg: 229     median: 229 (5%)     max: 244 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (11%)     max: 214 fps
min: 126     avg: 208.6     median: 209 (12%)     max: 282 fps
min: 289     avg: 299.5     median: 299.5 (18%)     max: 310 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 730
min: 245     avg: 385.5     median: 381 (3%)     max: 468 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
min: 378     avg: 390.5     median: 390.5 (3%)     max: 403 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (40%)     max: 366379 Points
min: 293017     avg: 423760     median: 430076 (54%)     max: 479126 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (1%)
min: 128.28     avg: 144.8     median: 144.8 (1%)     max: 161.33 fps
min: 239     avg: 244     median: 244 (2%)     max: 249 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
min: 5301     avg: 5418     median: 5418 (2%)     max: 5535 Points
min: 16906     avg: 16947     median: 16946.5 (5%)     max: 16987 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (3%)
min: 6354     avg: 6655     median: 6503 (2%)     max: 7108 Points
min: 16011     avg: 16045     median: 16044.5 (5%)     max: 16078 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
min: 5.52     avg: 9.5     median: 9.6 (4%)     max: 14.2 Watt
min: 10.2     avg: 11.7     median: 11.7 (5%)     max: 13.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 730 → 123% n=16

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 196% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 730:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 730:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 730:
110  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 730:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
122%
Adreno 730:
55 91 ~ 73 fps
high
Adreno 730:
55  fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
55 60 ~ 58 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
59%
Adreno 730:
35  fps
101%
Xclipse 940:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
81%
Adreno 730:
35 60 ~ 48 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
70%
Adreno 730:
30 34 60 ~ 41 fps
101%
Xclipse 940:
58 59 ~ 59 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
112%
Adreno 730:
30 43 56.9 60 60 60 60 60 60 63 72 90 94 99 103 188 ~ 75 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
134%
Adreno 730:
57 57 58 58 59 59 59 59.8 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 59 fps
205%
Xclipse 940:
90 90 ~ 90 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
149%
Adreno 730:
51 58 59 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 59 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
178%
Adreno 730:
30 30 50 55 58 58 59 59 59 59 59.8 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
188%
Xclipse 940:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
30 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Xclipse 940:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 730:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Xclipse 940:
105 119 ~ 112 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Adreno 730:
30 60 ~ 45 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 730 → 112%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 110%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 149%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 130%

Qualcomm Adreno 730lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal6060
League of Legends: Wild Rift1106060
Call of Duty Mobile735558
Genshin Impact354841
Armajet75
PUBG Mobile59595740
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends45
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
3

2


3
3

3
2






Samsung Xclipse 920lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
Call of Duty Mobile60
Genshin Impact59.559.358.2
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile4439.532
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1

2


1
2

1







Samsung Xclipse 940lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact6059
PUBG Mobile906040
Dead Trigger 2112
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2





2

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.27
log 13. 00:49:43

#0 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11105 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:39:56 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.116s ... 0.117s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.117s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.117s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.036s ... 0.154s

#9 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.01s ... 0.164s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11105 +0.002s ... 0.166s

#11 got single benchmarks 11105 +0.088s ... 0.254s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.002s ... 0.256s

#13 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.009s ... 0.265s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.265s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.165s ... 0.43s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.43s

#17 Got 162 rows for game benchmarks. +0.039s ... 0.469s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.469s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.473s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.015s ... 0.488s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.488s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.489s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)