Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 730

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 730

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 730

The Qualcomm Adreno 730 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SoC. The chip will be available starting early 2022 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. 

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 730 GPU offers a 30% improved performance thanks to 30% more ALUs over the Adreno 660, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 888 SoC.  Thanks to the new 4nm process, the power efficiency should also be improved.

The Adreno 730 supports Vulkan 1.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. 

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 730
Adreno 700 Series
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940 compare
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement18.01.2022 30.11.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 730GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
min: 1067     avg: 11770     median: 11974 (52%)     max: 15306 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
min: 15268     avg: 24195     median: 25285 (56%)     max: 27751 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
min: 5983     avg: 10777     median: 10726 (45%)     max: 13386 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
min: 11082     avg: 17826     median: 18581 (46%)     max: 20955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
min: 6483     avg: 10277     median: 10412 (5%)     max: 11201 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
min: 1567     avg: 2544     median: 2568 (3%)     max: 2899 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
min: 13     avg: 19.8     median: 20 (7%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
min: 19     avg: 41.2     median: 42 (8%)     max: 52 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
min: 60     avg: 104.3     median: 102 (8%)     max: 138 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
min: 50     avg: 85.5     median: 84 (8%)     max: 108 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
min: 95     avg: 144.2     median: 143 (3%)     max: 189 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
min: 126     avg: 210.3     median: 211 (9%)     max: 282 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 730
min: 245     avg: 388.8     median: 389.5 (3%)     max: 468 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
min: 293017     avg: 423114     median: 430076 (43%)     max: 479126 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
min: 428974     avg: 468332     median: 486753 (39%)     max: 489270 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (3%)
min: 128.28     avg: 144.8     median: 144.8 (4%)     max: 161.33 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
min: 5301     avg: 5752     median: 5535 (1%)     max: 6421 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (2%)
min: 6354     avg: 7072     median: 6805.5 (2%)     max: 8322 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
min: 5.52     avg: 9.3     median: 9.4 (4%)     max: 14.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 730 → 125% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 730:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 730:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 730:
110  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 730:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
122%
Adreno 730:
55 91 ~ 73 fps
high
Adreno 730:
55  fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
55 60 ~ 58 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
86%
Adreno 730:
35 59.3 59.6 ~ 51 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
81%
Adreno 730:
35 60 ~ 48 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
77%
Adreno 730:
30 34 41.7 59.4 60 ~ 45 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
112%
Adreno 730:
30 43 56.9 60 60 60 60 60 60 63 72 90 94 99 103 188 ~ 75 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
139%
Adreno 730:
57 57 58 58 58.8 59 59 59 59.8 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 89.2 ~ 61 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
149%
Adreno 730:
51 58 59 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 59 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
178%
Adreno 730:
30 30 50 55 58 58 58.9 59 59 59 59 59.8 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
30 39 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 730:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Adreno 730:
30 60 ~ 45 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 730 → 116%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 116%

Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 730
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal6060
League of Legends: Wild Rift601106060
Call of Duty Mobile60735558
Genshin Impact59.559.358.2514845
Armajet6775
PUBG Mobile4439.53261595740
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends45
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 730
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1

2


1
2

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4

2


3
3

3
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 16. 18:08:15

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11105 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752682095s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.016s ... 0.045s

#9 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.005s ... 0.05s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11105 +0s ... 0.05s

#11 got single benchmarks 11105 +0.033s ... 0.083s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.083s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.088s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.088s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.089s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.089s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.089s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.09s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.09s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.09s

#21 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.102s

#22 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.102s

#23 Got 159 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.12s

#24 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.12s

#25 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.121s

#26 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.124s

#27 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.124s

#28 return log +0.001s ... 0.125s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)