Notebookcheck Logo

Lenovo Legion Tab review – How well does the gaming tablet perform despite its older SoC?

Gaming latecomer.

Lenovo has made use of the name of its well-known Legion laptops to bring out a small tablet with a focus on gaming. The Lenovo Legion Tab aims to impress with its optimized cooling, two USB-C ports and long runtimes. How does the gaming tablet perform in the everyday life of a gamer?

After the success of gaming handhelds, it was only a matter of time until portable gaming tablets returned to the spotlight for manufacturers. Lenovo has been active in the gaming segment for a long time now with its Legion and LOQ laptops, and now it's attempting to reach out to Android gamers.

To do so, the manufacturer is releasing the Lenovo Legion Tab (also known as Legion Y700) which boasts good cooling, an SoC that isn't throttled as well as a speedy 144-Hz display. At about US$650, the 8.8-inch tablet isn't exactly cheap.

The Lenovo tablet doesn't face much competition (yet)—neither in its size class nor as a dedicated gaming tablet.

Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, DDR5X
Display
8.80 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 343 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, HDR 10, Dolby Vision, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 210 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSDXC (dedicated, up to 1 TB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Acceleration sensor, Hall sensor, position sensor
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 208.5 x 129.5 ( = 0.3 x 8.21 x 5.1 in)
Battery
6550 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 68 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix flash, video@ 4K, 30fps (camera 1), 2 MP (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix video @1080p, 30 fps
Additional features
folio case, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
350 g ( = 12.35 oz / 0.77 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86 %v8
08 / 2024
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
350 g7.6 mm8.80"2560x1600
86.6 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Razer Edge
SD G3x Gen 1, Adreno 660
264 g10.8 mm6.80"2400x1080
90.7 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
297 g6.3 mm8.30"2266x1488
86.8 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5
524 g6.5 mm10.90"2304x1440
89.1 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
750 g6.53 mm14.00"2880x1800

Please note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.

Case – Portable and high-quality

In terms of its footprint, the Lenovo Legion Tab is closest to the iPad Mini but apart from this, there aren't many tablets smaller than 10 inches in size on the market. At 350 grams, the Lenovo tablet isn't the lightest for its size, but you can still hold it comfortably for longer periods of time.

The bezels surrounding its screen are pretty narrow, so you may have to contend with the odd unwanted input on the touchscreen.

Its gray metal back is matte with a shiny Legion logo in the left corner. On the right sits the camera module which protrudes from the case, but only causes minimal wobbling if you use the tablet while it is lying on a table.

The tablet has been built well—nothing creaks and you can't feel material transitions with your fingers.

It doesn't feature an IP certification to protect it against dust or water.

Size comparison

318.58 mm / 12.5 in 206.1 mm / 8.11 in 6.53 mm / 0.2571 in 750 g1.653 lbs254.3 mm / 10 in 165.8 mm / 6.53 in 6.5 mm / 0.2559 in 524 g1.155 lbs208.5 mm / 8.21 in 129.5 mm / 5.1 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 350 g0.772 lbs195.4 mm / 7.69 in 134.8 mm / 5.31 in 6.3 mm / 0.248 in 297 g0.655 lbs167.8 mm / 6.61 in 84.5 mm / 3.33 in 10.8 mm / 0.4252 in 264 g0.582 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity – Two USB-C ports

Lenovo equips its portable tablet with 256 GB storage and 12 GB RAM. At an MRSP of about US$650, this is fine, as you are expected to pay a lot more for an iPad Mini with the same storage.

5G isn't available on this tablet, nor are there any different storage configurations to choose from.

It's interesting that Lenovo has given its Legion Tab two USB-C ports: The connection on the long side of the case is a USB 3.2 connection that can transfer data at up to 10 GBit/s and, at the same time, acts as a DisplayPort for image output.

The second port on the short side is a standard USB 2.0 connection and is likely mostly meant for charging the device. Even so, it can additionally be used for data transfers to and from other devices, or to connect peripherals such as a controller or a mouse.

Left: USB-C 3.2 port
Left: USB-C 3.2 port
Right: volume rocker, standby button, 2x microphone
Right: volume rocker, standby button, 2x microphone
Bottom: speaker, USB-C 2.0 port
Bottom: speaker, USB-C 2.0 port
Top: speaker
Top: speaker

microSD card reader

The compact Legion Tab even comes with a microSD card reader, so its storage space for data can be expanded and data exchanges are made easier by using appropriate memory cards.

In our test using our reference microSD card Angelbird V60, the reader only achieved mediocre speeds, so a little patience is required when using it.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
58.36 MB/s +124%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.1 MB/s
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
14.34 MB/s -45%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø21.1 (13.4-43.7)
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø24 (14.4-50.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.3 (30.1-58)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø57.8 (30.2-66.2)
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70.7 (31-81.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.7 (43.8-97.8)

Sustainability

Lenovo has made a calculation of the CO2-equivalent emissions produced over the tablet's life cycle available for customers to read. Apparently the Lenovo Legion Tab generates 63 kg, of which around 70 % (45 kg) is attributable to production. The Lenovo Legion Tab is also packaged plastic-free.

However, Lenovo hasn't made any special efforts to ensure better sustainability when it comes to the tablet's materials and reparability.

Software – Android 14 via an update

At first, the tablet was delivered with Android 13, as it already entered onto the market last year in China. In the meantime, Android 14 has become available and when first starting up the device, it installs multiple updates.

Our test device's latest security patches were from June 2024 so at the time of testing, they were still relatively up to date. Lenovo aims to provide security updates until February 2028. You should also be able to expect one or two Android version updates, but this is based on our own experience with the manufacturer—Lenovo itself hasn't made any official promises.

The adapted Android version from Lenovo is called Lenovo ZUI 16 and at first glance, it doesn't look like much has been changed. However, it features several advanced functions that may be of interest to users: Of course, a gaming mode is important for a gaming tablet—on this model, it is called Game Assistant and can be called up via the left side of the screen when playing games. You can activate it for individual games or switch it off completely—in addition, you can change settings for the tablet's notifications and performance.

The system also automatically optimizes third-party apps for multitasking. However, important app controls occasionally disappeared during our test, meaning that this function didn't always work optimally.

Communication – Speedy WLAN on the Legion Tab

As already mentioned, the tablet doesn't support cellular connections and despite its portable size, the Legion Tab also doesn't feature NFC, so you can't use wireless payment processes.

WiFi 6E is the fasted available WLAN standard, which means that the less busy 6 GHz network can also be used for Wi-Fi networks with a suitable router. In our test with the Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 reference router, the tablet scored points with its high reception speeds. The tablet can fully make use of a gigabit internet line and its full speed of around 1,581 MBit/s ensures even faster transmissions when connected to your home network.

Only when sending data did the speed drop significantly, and in some cases well below the level of the comparison devices. However, with an average of 691 MBit/s, it should usually be very fast to send data in most networks.

We also tested the WLAN module's signal strength. We noted no problems close to the router and at a distance of 10 meters with 3 walls in between, around 60 % of the signal strength was available and large websites still loaded very quickly.

Networking
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
691 (min: 606) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1581 (min: 1497) MBit/s ∼100%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
908 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
801 (min: 371) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1480 (min: 1022) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1448 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
847 (min: 791) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
795 (min: 342) MBit/s ∼84%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
957 (min: 890) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
946 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼100%
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø691 (606-873)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1581 (1497-1620)

Cameras – With 4K video recording

Photo taken using front-facing camera
Photo taken using front-facing camera

As the Lenovo Legion Tab is quite portable, you may get the idea that you can also use it to take photos and videos on the go. In general, this works absolutely fine—there are even two camera lenses on the back, whereby one can't be used to take photos and is instead only there to support bokeh effects.

So only the main camera remains which has a resolution of 13 megapixels and took decent photos during our test. Even so, the images look a little pale and are lacking in contrast. In low-light conditions with high contests, the flame is overexposed on the photo of the candle and you can barely recognize anything in darker areas. Its sharpness is average in this case. 

You can record video at a maximum of 30fps, but you can at least do so in 4K. In fact, the resulting videos have a decent quality—the autofocus reacts quickly and even in low light, the image sharpness is okay.

There is a selfie camera with an 8-MP resolution on the front of the tablet above the screen. It takes good photos with decent sharpness. In very light or very dark parks of the image, you shouldn't expect to recognize all too much detail.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light

We tested the main camera in our photography lab. Here, different lighting scenarios are set the same for all devices.

We began in full studio lighting. At first glance, the photo of the test chart actually looks pretty decent but upon closer inspection, you can notice that quite a lot is blurry in detail. In very low light, the camera doesn't recognize anything anymore.

ColorChecker
3.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC: 5.82 ∆E min: 1.34 - max: 12.81 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC: 47.17 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 94.33 ∆E

Accessories and warranty – No charger included

The Lenovo Legion Tab with its folio case
The Lenovo Legion Tab with its folio case

Lenovo doesn't deliver the device with a charger but you get a USB cable, a tool to open the microSD slot and a folio case. You can purchase a corresponding charger directly from Lenovo, however, you can also simply use a different charger that supports Power Delivery. 

The tablet is covered by a standard 12-month warranty if it was purchased in the United States.

Input devices & operation – No fingerprint sensor

The display, which has a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz, reacts super quickly to inputs and the touchscreen worked accurately and precisely during the entire course of our test.

You can feel for the hardware buttons on the case easily and they have a clear pressure point. The standby button is slightly ribbed, so it can be distinguished well.

The tablet doesn't feature a fingerprint sensor but instead, users can make use of facial recognition as a biometric method to unlock the device. In good lighting conditions, it works quite quickly and without any issues and in darkness, the screen's light is often enough for faces to still be recognized.

Unfortunately, its facial recognition works without a depth sensor, so it could technically be overridden by using a photo. As a result, some apps with high security requirements do not allow facial recognition as a biometric identification method.

Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright
Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard horizontal

Display – IPS screen without PWM

Sub-pixel array
Sub-pixel array

The IPS screen has a diameter of 8.8 inches and an aspect ratio of 16:10. Its resolution of 2,560 x 1,600 pixels is high and allows for content to be depicted sharply on the tablet's relatively small screen.

It has a maximum screen brightness of 472 cd/m², which is on the same level as comparable tablets, but it doesn't exactly stand out from the crowd. Its brightness distribution is somewhat uneven, and slight differences in brightness can be seen with the naked eye when looking at large, uniform surfaces. However, this shouldn't be a problem during everyday use.

Its black value is relatively high, meaning black areas look more like gray at high brightness levels and its contrast ratio is poor.

372
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 472 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 420.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 77 %
Center on Battery: 443 cd/m²
Contrast: 738:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.166
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"
Razer Edge
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8"
Apple iPad Mini 6
IPS, 2266x1488, 8.3"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
TFT-LCD, 2304x1440, 10.9"
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 14"
Screen
-53%
21%
16%
33%
Brightness middle
443
449
1%
453
2%
694
57%
630
42%
Brightness
421
445
6%
440
5%
695
65%
591
40%
Brightness Distribution
77
95
23%
94
22%
88
14%
85
10%
Black Level *
0.6
0.4
33%
0.66
-10%
0.82
-37%
Contrast
738
1133
54%
1052
43%
768
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.3
4.8
-109%
1.52
34%
2.1
9%
0.6
74%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.75
8.1
-116%
3.28
13%
4.3
-15%
1
73%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
5.5
-120%
2.3
8%
3.3
-32%
1
60%
Gamma
2.166 102%
2.24 98%
2.26 97%
2.26 97%
2.2 100%
CCT
7086 92%
7538 86%
6900 94%
7010 93%
6624 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

All-in-all, the display's color depiction is decent and you will likely only be able to notice minimal deviations to the color space's optimum value with the naked eye.

We didn't note any PWM flickering. Its response times are a little on the slow side, which may be an issue for hardcore gamers.

CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.4 ms rise
↘ 8.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.3 ms rise
↘ 13.3 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Outside, the screen has to contend with quite bad reflections in bright surroundings, which the rather dim display can hardly compete with. It's a lot more comfortable to use the device in the shade.

We noticed some slight color shifts when taking a look at its color deviations but overall, you can still recognize the picture well when looking at it from the side.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance – Fast gamer

At first glance, the manufacturer's decision to go for the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 seems a little strange: Why would Lenovo choose an SoC from 2022 to power a designated gaming tablet when there are plenty of more up-to-date alternatives?

Well, first of all, it has to be said that the Lenovo Legion Tab was already released in China in 2023 as the Lenovo Legion Y700. Lenovo itself also states that it was looking for an SoC that is easy to cool and isn't throttled.

Compared to similarly expensive or similarly designed tablets, the Lenovo Legion Tab by no means performed badly during our benchmarks, even with its older SoC. It has more than enough power to run the vast majority of apps.

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
4761 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
4690 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4140 - 4761, n=7)
4493 Points -6%
Razer Edge
3757 Points -21%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=65, last 2 years)
3391 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
2858 Points -40%
Single-Core
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1854 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
1798 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1530 - 1854, n=7)
1735 Points -6%
Razer Edge
1596 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=65, last 2 years)
1056 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
1011 Points -45%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Mini 6
1590 Points +19%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
1389 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1334 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (897 - 1389, n=25)
1281 Points -4%
Razer Edge
1170 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
778 Points -42%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1890, n=71, last 2 years)
704 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Mini 6
4640 Points +11%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
4367 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
4194 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3782 - 4436, n=25)
4167 Points -1%
Razer Edge
3553 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
2728 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2450 Points -42%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1341049 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1162599 - 1341049, n=3)
1270622 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=33, last 2 years)
692347 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
573936 Points -57%
Razer Edge
Points -100%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1085887 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (782013 - 1119358, n=23)
997431 Points -8%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
950385 Points -12%
Apple iPad Mini 6
774680 Points -29%
Razer Edge
740704 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
505141 Points -53%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=51, last 2 years)
479711 Points -56%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
20841 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
16584 Points -20%
Razer Edge
16261 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (11029 - 20841, n=24)
15090 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
11259 Points -46%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=71, last 2 years)
9556 Points -54%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
1098 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1036 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 - 1178, n=23)
1033 Points 0%
Razer Edge
987 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
762 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
673 Points -35%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
7589 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (5642 - 8753, n=23)
7450 Points +25%
Razer Edge
6797 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
5953 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
4424 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 9147, n=57, last 2 years)
3887 Points -35%
System
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
12132 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (8750 - 13563, n=23)
11726 Points +28%
Razer Edge
11334 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
9163 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
9016 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=57, last 2 years)
6898 Points -25%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
8726 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3871 - 9114, n=23)
7492 Points +27%
Razer Edge
7081 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
5897 Points
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=57, last 2 years)
4599 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
4486 Points -24%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (16194 - 26660, n=23)
21146 Points +31%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
19973 Points +23%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
16194 Points
Razer Edge
15906 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=57, last 2 years)
7340 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
7031 Points -57%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1198 - 2006, n=23)
1699 Points +18%
Razer Edge
1672 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
1574 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1435 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
1347 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=57, last 2 years)
1237 Points -14%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (887 - 147801, n=11)
37778 Points +2854%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=49, last 2 years)
5184 Points +305%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
1283 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1279 Points
Razer Edge
889 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
636 Points -50%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3291 - 84787, n=21)
43831 Points +213%
Razer Edge
18822 Points +34%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
14014 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
13748 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=55, last 2 years)
8992 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
6110 Points -56%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Razer Edge
834 Points +72%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
485 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ()
485 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (112 - 834, n=6, last 2 years)
380 Points -22%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average of class Tablet (66 - 6806, n=8, last 2 years)
1160 Points +48%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
785 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ()
785 Points 0%
Razer Edge
645 Points -18%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Average of class Tablet (137 - 4617, n=8, last 2 years)
1014 Points +26%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
802 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ()
802 Points 0%
Razer Edge
670 Points -16%

Legend

 
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 660, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad Mini 6 Apple A15 Bionic, Apple A15 GPU 5-Core, 64 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

The GPU also proved to still be powerful during the benchmarks, even managing over 20fps in GFXBench Aztec Ruins 4K. This means the tablet can still render smoothly even in very high resolutions.

Although it doesn't yet support the latest features such ray tracing, you will barely find these in mobile games anyway. Even so, if these features could become of greater importance to you in the future, then you should know that the Lenovo Tab is the wrong choice in this case.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3001 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2749 Points
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
2625 Points -5%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2463 Points -10%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1446 Points -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
2870 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2806 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2488 Points -11%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1526 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
838 Points -70%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11002 Points
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
10919 Points -1%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9785 Points -11%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5750 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2987 Points -73%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
9498 Points
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5817 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2958 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12785 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11937 Points -7%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9182 Points -28%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
6175 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5013 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19840 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17683 Points -11%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
13133 Points -34%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11965 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5233 Points -74%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5696 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5647 Points -1%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5062 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4369 Points -23%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
2163 Points -62%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +20%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +20%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps -32%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
450 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
447 fps -1%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
439.6 fps -2%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 fps -43%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
120 fps -73%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
122 fps +3%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
122 fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps -3%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
269 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
265 fps -1%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
237 fps -12%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps -46%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps -71%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps -9%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps -9%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -26%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -66%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
175 fps -4%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
154.2 fps -15%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
107 fps -41%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
107 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps -71%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
57.6 fps -1%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -3%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -64%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
102 fps -1%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
99.2 fps -4%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
51.8 fps +18%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -9%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -64%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -2%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
41.2 fps -10%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -10%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
59.6 fps -17%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -67%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
124 fps
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
116.1 fps -6%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -7%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -72%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps 0%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps -71%

The Lenovo Legion Tab also proved to be very fast in the browser benchmarks and in practice, with fast-loading websites and images that were already displayed while scrolling.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC (Chrome 127)
204.072 Points
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15)
173.5 Points -15%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)
156.36 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 204, n=23)
125.2 Points -39%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
107.9 Points -47%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)
105.645 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
102.6 Points -50%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)
163 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC (Chrome 127)
144 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=21)
113.9 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
107 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)
102.6 Points -29%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)
99 Points -31%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15)
228 runs/min +16%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC (Chrome 127)
196 runs/min
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)
180 runs/min -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 196, n=18)
119.6 runs/min -39%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)
114.9 runs/min -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
80.1 runs/min -59%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC (Chrome 127)
61536 Points
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15)
57143 Points -7%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)
53177 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 61536, n=24)
42193 Points -31%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)
40762 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
34739 Points -44%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28263 Points -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3807 ms * -472%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
1208.7 ms * -82%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)
1121.3 ms * -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (665 - 1707, n=22)
1023 ms * -54%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)
776.2 ms * -17%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC (Chrome 127)
665.3 ms *
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15)
455.1 ms * +32%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=21, last 2 years)
12.6 runs/min +12%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC (Chrome 127)
11.3 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (10.9 - 11.3, n=2)
11.1 runs/min -2%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)
9.93 runs/min -12%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 3.1 storage is already outdated in current top-of-the-range smartphones, but the Lenovo Legion Tab is still quite fast in the comparison field. The storage's short loading times and fast data transfers are just as impressive in practice.

Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FCRazer EdgeSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FEXiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-33%
-67%
14%
-15%
-51%
Sequential Read 256KB
1650.8
1442.83
-13%
526.65
-68%
1983.47
20%
Sequential Write 256KB
1532.4
692.3
-55%
282.47
-82%
1873.45
22%
1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=100)
-24%
Random Read 4KB
346.9
264.67
-24%
225.02
-35%
374.54
8%
Random Write 4KB
416.4
252.12
-39%
68.78
-83%
446.71
7%

Games – Even 90fps possible

Of course, gaming should be the core competence of the Lenovo Legion Tab. And the manufacturer has actually made a lot possible in this respect: During our test, we only noted less than 60fps using UltraHD settings when running PUBG Mobile. At very low settings, however, a very stable 90fps was even possible when playing this game.

Genshin Impact resulted in a smooth 60fps even at very high details. So nothing stands in the way of buttery smooth and responsive gaming on the Lenovo Legion Tab.

We measured the frame rates using the GameBench software.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.6 (51-60)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø59.4 (49-60)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.2 (84-91)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø40 (39-40)

Emissions – No throttling under load

Temperature

We measured a heat increase up to 49.9 °C on the outside of the tablet under prolonged high load. This was already clearly noticeable and could get even higher at high ambient temperatures.

However, Lenovo has kept its word and cools the SoC so efficiently that even after several repetitions of the 3DMark benchmarks, there was no noticeable drop in frame rates. The system therefore manages to maintain its performance.

Max. Load
 45.7 °C
114 F
42.3 °C
108 F
39.2 °C
103 F
 
 47.8 °C
118 F
44.5 °C
112 F
39.2 °C
103 F
 
 48.7 °C
120 F
45.4 °C
114 F
39.2 °C
103 F
 
Maximum: 48.7 °C = 120 F
Average: 43.6 °C = 110 F
39.5 °C
103 F
44.5 °C
112 F
45.4 °C
114 F
40 °C
104 F
44.8 °C
113 F
48.4 °C
119 F
39.8 °C
104 F
44.9 °C
113 F
49.9 °C
122 F
Maximum: 49.9 °C = 122 F
Average: 44.1 °C = 111 F
Power Supply (max.)  45.6 °C = 114 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø63 (62.4-63.3)
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø30.2 (26.7-34.8)
Apple iPad Mini 6 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø51 (49.9-56.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.6-17.9)
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56.1 (55.9-56.5)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.7 (16.6-16.8)
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.07 (7.68-9.12)
Apple iPad Mini 6 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.5 (14.1-17.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.05 (5.03-5.07)
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø14.7 (14.7-14.8)
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø30.7 (27.8-35.1)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
99.6 (14.7min - 14.8max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
99.3 (5.03min - 5.07max) % 0%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
99.2 (16.6min - 16.8max) %
Razer Edge
84.2 (7.68min - 9.12max) % -15%
Apple iPad Mini 6
82.3 (14.1min - 17.2max) % -17%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
99 (55.9min - 56.5max) % 0%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
98.7 (62.4min - 63.3max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
98.4 (17.6min - 17.9max) % 0%
Apple iPad Mini 6
87.8 (49.9min - 56.9max) % -11%
Razer Edge
76.9 (26.7min - 34.8max) % -22%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Razer Edge
79.2 (27.8min - 35.1max) %

Legend

 
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 660, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad Mini 6 Apple A15 Bionic, Apple A15 GPU 5-Core, 64 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Heat map back
Heat map back
Heat map back
Heat map back

Speakers

Stereo speakers are installed on the short sides of the tablet. They deliver really good sound and can get quite loud at up to 82 dB(A) if desired. Higher bass frequencies are clearly audible and perceptible, and the sound is warm and full. Even at maximum volume, the speakers don't distort the sound.

External speakers or headphones can be connected either via USB-C or Bluetooth. A decent selection of codecs is available for wireless sound transmission: SBC, AAC, LDAC, aptX, aptX HD, LC3 and Opus.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.637.22538.236.23129.227.54031.233.4503941.46324.524.48018.728.310023.339.512517.343.616014.74920010.451.825012.553.331512.357.44009.66350010.165.963013.4668001366.9100015.573125010.672.5160010.375.3200010.769250011.265.4315013.167.8400013.662.9500014.666.6630014.470.1800015.469.91000016.372.71250016.367.4160001757.2SPL25.682N0.753.2median 13.4median 66Delta2.36.929.532.533.134.327.425.631.329.830.33229.62724.123.220.732.117.641.914.847.412.348.812.852.410.454.1956.711.361.314.460.617.163.41465.610.461.59.456.710.657.911.459.613.661.413.766.615.365.815.465.616.661.417.65617.355.517.64826.374.70.735.3median 14median 57.93.15.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Legion Tab TB320FCApple iPad Mini 6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Mini 6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power management – Good runtimes for everyday use

Power consumption

Despite its good performance, the Lenovo Legion Tab doesn't need that much power: It is already quite frugal in idle mode and the same can be said under full load, where we measured 7.9 watts.

The battery can be charged at a maximum of 68 watts. You should allow 1 1/2 hours for a full charge. With a slower charger, it will take a little longer, but this can be more gentle on the battery.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 4.6 / 7.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
6550 mAh
Razer Edge
5000 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 6
5177 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
8000 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
10000 mAh
Power Consumption
-55%
-69%
-164%
-302%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.2
-33%
1.1
-22%
1.13
-26%
2.57
-186%
Idle Average *
1.3
1.33
-2%
2.2
-69%
4.81
-270%
8.65
-565%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.37
14%
4.2
-163%
4.89
-206%
8.71
-444%
Load Average *
4.6
12.16
-164%
6.7
-46%
15.02
-227%
14.98
-226%
Load Maximum *
7.9
15.14
-92%
11.4
-44%
15.22
-93%
14.99
-90%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC: Ø4.81 (0.917-9.34)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.87 (7.75-8.07)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.984 (0.887-1.19)

Runtimes

At 6,550 mAh, the Legion Tab has a fairly powerful battery. This ensures good runtimes: 15:42 hours when surfing using Wi-Fi should be sufficient for a rainy day on the couch with this tablet. When watching movies, however, its runtimes are hardly any longer: The tablet ran for 15:46 hours during our test, so you can often also manage a season of your favorite series.

Under load and therefore also when gaming, you should expect a runtime of around 4 hours. This is a pretty good value, so you don't have to look for a power socket immediately after completing every level of a game.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 46min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 08min
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
6550 mAh
Razer Edge
5000 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 6
5177 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
8000 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
10000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-43%
-15%
-7%
-5%
Reader / Idle
2056
1802
-12%
H.264
946
903
-5%
WiFi v1.3
942
533
-43%
816
-13%
872
-7%
898
-5%
Load
248
179
-28%

Pros

+ compact build
+ high-quality case with a sleek design
+ good performance values
+ high and stable frame rates when playing games
+ decent runtimes
+ powerful stereo speakers
+ option to record video in 4K
+ speedy WLAN
+ two USB ports...
+ ... of which one supports DisplayPort

Cons

- screen has slightly slow response times
- no cellular model available
- camera's photos are blurry at times
- doesn't support ray tracing
- no fingerprint sensor

Verdict – A handy tablet not just for gamers

Lenovo Legion Tab review
Lenovo Legion Tab review

Its size alone makes the Lenovo Legion Tab interesting for those who are on the lookout for a powerful tablet with a compact footprint: Aside from the iPad Mini, there are barely any others on the market.

Yes, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 may not be the most up-to-date SoC but in turn, it is able to keep its power stable over a longer period of time and proves to be very powerful indeed when running apps and games. However, you'll have to factor in that the tablet heats up quite a bit under continuous load.

Despite its portable size, the tablet isn't the most suited for outdoor use, as its screen isn't the brightest. Thankfully, we noted no PWM flickering, meaning even sensitive users should be able to work just fine with this display.

Its battery life is good, its WLAN is speedy, and it features a stable case and even a microSD card reader. Its two USB-C ports are super practical, as they let you connect accessories while keeping the tablet connected to the power at the same time.

The Lenovo Legion Tab is a powerful gaming tablet that could also be of interest to non-gamers thanks to its portable size and sleek appearance.

If you like to use iPadOS, then you should take a look at the iPad Mini 6 which is also very powerful and even a little cheaper (with less storage) than the Lenovo Legion Tab. The Razer Edge costs even less but is a bit smaller.

Price and availability

At the time of writing, the Lenovo Legion Tab is not yet available to purchase in the United States. You can view all of the devices currently available from the manufacturer directly via its website.

Please note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.

Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC - 08/14/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
73 / 80 → 91%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
47 / 69 → 68%
Weight
86 / 40-88 → 95%
Battery
90%
Display
80%
Games Performance
43 / 65 → 66%
Application Performance
73 / 92 → 79%
AI Performance
43%
Temperature
83%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 91 → 90%
Camera
59 / 90 → 66%
Average
68%
86%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
89.2%
Materials
10%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
93.2%
Repairability
6%
Software Updates
60%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 55.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article