Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is an Arrow Lake-based desktop processor with 24 cores in two clusters. The 8 performance cores clock at up to 5.6 GHz and the 16 smaller efficiency cores at up to 4.6 GHz.

Due to the lower clock rate and the low TDP, the CPU performance is slightly below the Core Ultra 9 285K is positioned.

The Arrow Lake-S chips are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

The TDP is specified at 65 watts (long-term) to 182 watts (Turbo).

Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 225F

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F is a relatively power efficient desktop processor of the Arrow Lake generation. It integrates 10 cores in two clusters. The 6 performance cores (Lion Cove P-Cores) clock from 3.3 to 4.9 GHz and the 4 efficiency cores (Skymont E-Cores) clock from 2.7 to 4.4 GHz. The CPU has access to 20 MB Smart Cache and 22 MB L2 Cache.

Detailed benchmarks and measured values can be found in our detailed test report on the Core Ultra 5 225F.

The F series is specified with a TDP of 65 watts and is therefore also suitable for smaller desktop PCs with air cooling.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 285Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
CodenameArrow Lake-SArrow Lake-S
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeIntel Arrow Lake
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-S
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K compare3.2 - 5.7 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 « 1.9 - 5.6 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245 compare3 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235 compare3.4 - 5 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F3.3 - 4.9 GHz10 / 10 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K compare3.2 - 5.7 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 2851.9 - 5.6 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245 compare3 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235 compare3.4 - 5 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz10 / 10 cores20 MB L3
Clock1900 - 5600 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz
L2 Cache39.3 MB22 MB
L3 Cache36 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 24
8 x 5.6 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
10 / 10
6 x 4.9 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 4.4 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2182 Watt121 Watt
Technology3 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketLGA1851LGA1851
iGPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ( - 2000 MHz)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT813 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.intel.de
$221 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 5 225F
40.3 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
119 Points (67%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
931 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
16467 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1893 Points (80%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
726 Points (79%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6386 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2660 Points (17%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
287 Points (80%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
32.7 Points (42%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (86%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11133 Points (67%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
71536 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
115987 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17066 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
107.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8846 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
54166 MIPS (31%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6000 MIPS (71%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
148.9 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
364.5 fps (9%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
20.7 fps (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.6 GB/s (30%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
351 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
218 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16795 Points (36%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
80449 Points (62%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
21562 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
115779 Points (94%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
115875 Points (94%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
119117 Points (96%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19272 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
31547 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11220 Points (47%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
3061 Points (74%)
2860 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
19926 Points (77%)
14878 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2082 Points (79%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
13898 Points (25%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2035 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13908 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8813 Points (88%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
50491 Points (49%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
451 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
304 Points (84%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
319 Points (57%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2006 Points (75%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
163.7 Watt (28%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
193.8 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
94 Watt (62%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
13.7 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 225F → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 08. 08:05:32

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18617 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19654 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759903532s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18617 +0s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 18617 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19654 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 19654 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.02s ... 0.038s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.038s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.046s

#15 return log +0.007s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)