The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F is a relatively power efficient desktop processor of the Arrow Lake generation. It integrates 10 cores in two clusters. The 6 performance cores (Lion Cove P-Cores) clock from 3.3 to 4.9 GHz and the 4 efficiency cores (Skymont E-Cores) clock from 2.7 to 4.4 GHz. The CPU has access to 20 MB Smart Cache and 22 MB L2 Cache.
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is an Arrow Lake-based desktop processor with 24 cores in two clusters. The 8 performance cores clock at up to 5.6 GHz and the 16 smaller efficiency cores at up to 4.6 GHz.
Due to the lower clock rate and the low TDP, the CPU performance is slightly below the Core Ultra 9 285K is positioned.
The Arrow Lake-S chips are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.
The TDP is specified at 65 watts (long-term) to 182 watts (Turbo).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 225F → 100%n=2
Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 285 → 120%n=2
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.34
log 24. 12:11:42
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 19654 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 18617 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761300702s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:39:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 19654 +0.004s ... 0.009s
#8 got single benchmarks 19654 +0.005s ... 0.014s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18617 +0.001s ... 0.015s
#10 got single benchmarks 18617 +0.003s ... 0.018s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.048s