Toshiba Satellite Z830-10J
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 10 scores (from 15 reviews)
Reviews for the Toshiba Satellite Z830-10J
Light as a feather. The power of a big notebook, but as light as a netbook. The Z830, as Toshiba's first ultrabook, presents itself with good battery runtimes and outdoor suitability. Where is the device positioned in comparison to the ultrabook competition from Asus, Acer, Lenovo and co.? Find all details here in this review.
Source: T3
Archive.org versionWhile we couldn’t get Toshiba to give us any hints about the final retail price, it sure looks like this Satellite will end up being a good solution for those wanting the features and benefits of the Ultrabook design combined with a study chassis, long battery life, and full-sized ports. We sure can’t wait to get our hands on the final production model and will be keeping our fingers crossed for a reasonably low sticker price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/24/2012
Source: APC Mag
Archive.org versionToshiba’s lightweight Satellite Z830 Ultrabook shows the days of big, heavy notebooks are numbered. What’s great about this Ultrabook is that it feels like a traditional notebook that’s been miraculously slimmed down to almost tablet thickness. The array of ports and the performance are those of a big computer, not of an ultra-thin.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/23/2012
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Magazin - Spezial 53 Ultrabooks

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2013
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Ocaholic.ch
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/23/2012
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Onlinekosten.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2012
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 87% features: 73% display: 87% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Chip.de - Test&Kauf 2/12

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 03/01/2012
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Notebookinfo
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/27/2012
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 75% display: 90% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 90% emissions: 90%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2011
Rating: performance: 70% features: 50% display: 40% mobility: 60% workmanship: 50% ergonomy: 50%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/09/2011
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 78% display: 68% mobility: 92% workmanship: 92% ergonomy: 83% emissions: 83%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/07/2011
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 81% features: 74% display: 80% mobility: 88% ergonomy: 83% emissions: 77%
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/01/2011
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 71% performance: 67% features: 63% display: 95% mobility: 76% ergonomy: 79%
Source: ZDNet
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/29/2011
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→EN Archive.org versiongood but not perfect; small keys, low battery time, slow SSD; positve: matte display, flat, light, lot of connection options
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2012
Source: Focus Online
DE→EN Archive.org versionespecially light and good
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/09/2012
Source: Tom's Hardware
DE→EN Archive.org versionfast but small SSD, dark display with small resolution, good equipment, loud fan
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 01/26/2012
Comment
Intel HD Graphics 3000: Integrated graphics card in the Intel Sandy Bridge processors (Core ix-2xxx). The HD 3000 is the faster (internally GT2 called) version with 12 Execution Units (EUs).
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
2467M: Power saving ULV processor clocked at 1.6-2.3 GHz due to Turbo boost. Offers an integrated HD 3000 clocked at slow 350 / 1150 MHz and a DDR3-1333 memory controller.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.