Toshiba Satellite Z830 Series
Processor: Intel Core i3 2367M, Intel Core i5 2467MGraphics Adapter: Intel HD Graphics 3000
Display: 13.30 inch
Weight: 1.1kg, 1.11kg
Price: 999, 1100, 1300 euro
Average of 24 scores (from 36 reviews)
Toshiba Satellite Z830-10T
Specifications
Notebook: Toshiba Satellite Z830-10TProcessor: Intel Core i3 2367M
Graphics Adapter: Intel HD Graphics 3000
Display: 13.30 inch, 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixels
Weight: 1.1kg
Price: 1100 euro
Links: Toshiba homepage Toshiba notebook section Satellite Z830 (Series) Satellite Z830-10T (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionIf you want to buy an Ultrabook, then buy this one. It's only 1.1kg and 16mm thick, but it has a conventional feature-set and it feels very comfortable to use. We enjoyed reviewing it very much, more so than the models from Acer and ASUS. Our only quibbles are with the screen's viewing angles, the stiff touchpad buttons and the slightly sharp corners of the chassis.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/24/2011
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: It Pro
Archive.org versionThe Toshiba Satellite Z830 is the most promising Ultrabook design we've seen so far, if only because it doesn't slavishly ape the MacBook Air. Much depends on pricing and battery life though which we won't be able to judge until final production models arrive in the UK later this year.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/05/2011
Toshiba Satellite Z830-10J
Specifications
Notebook: Toshiba Satellite Z830-10JProcessor: Intel Core i5 2467M
Graphics Adapter: Intel HD Graphics 3000
Display: 13.30 inch, 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixels
Weight: 1.11kg
Price: 999 euro
Links: Toshiba homepage Toshiba notebook section Satellite Z830 (Series)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Light as a feather. The power of a big notebook, but as light as a netbook. The Z830, as Toshiba's first ultrabook, presents itself with good battery runtimes and outdoor suitability. Where is the device positioned in comparison to the ultrabook competition from Asus, Acer, Lenovo and co.? Find all details here in this review.
Source: T3
Archive.org versionWhile we couldn’t get Toshiba to give us any hints about the final retail price, it sure looks like this Satellite will end up being a good solution for those wanting the features and benefits of the Ultrabook design combined with a study chassis, long battery life, and full-sized ports. We sure can’t wait to get our hands on the final production model and will be keeping our fingers crossed for a reasonably low sticker price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/24/2012
Source: T3
Archive.org versionWhile we couldn’t get Toshiba to give us any hints about the final retail price, it sure looks like this Satellite will end up being a good solution for those wanting the features and benefits of the Ultrabook design combined with a study chassis, long battery life, and full-sized ports. We sure can’t wait to get our hands on the final production model and will be keeping our fingers crossed for a reasonably low sticker price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/24/2012
Source: APC Mag
Archive.org versionToshiba’s lightweight Satellite Z830 Ultrabook shows the days of big, heavy notebooks are numbered. What’s great about this Ultrabook is that it feels like a traditional notebook that’s been miraculously slimmed down to almost tablet thickness. The array of ports and the performance are those of a big computer, not of an ultra-thin.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/23/2012
Source: APC Mag
Archive.org versionToshiba’s lightweight Satellite Z830 Ultrabook shows the days of big, heavy notebooks are numbered. What’s great about this Ultrabook is that it feels like a traditional notebook that’s been miraculously slimmed down to almost tablet thickness. The array of ports and the performance are those of a big computer, not of an ultra-thin.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/23/2012
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Magazin - Spezial 53 Ultrabooks

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2013
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: PC Magazin - Spezial 53 Ultrabooks

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2013
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Ocaholic.ch
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/23/2012
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Ocaholic.ch
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/23/2012
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Onlinekosten.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2012
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 87% features: 73% display: 87% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Onlinekosten.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2012
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 87% features: 73% display: 87% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Chip.de - Test&Kauf 2/12

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 03/01/2012
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Chip.de - Test&Kauf 2/12

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 03/01/2012
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Notebookinfo
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/27/2012
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 75% display: 90% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 90% emissions: 90%
Source: Notebookinfo
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/27/2012
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 75% display: 90% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 90% emissions: 90%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2011
Rating: performance: 70% features: 50% display: 40% mobility: 60% workmanship: 50% ergonomy: 50%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2011
Rating: performance: 70% features: 50% display: 40% mobility: 60% workmanship: 50% ergonomy: 50%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/09/2011
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 78% display: 68% mobility: 92% workmanship: 92% ergonomy: 83% emissions: 83%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/09/2011
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 78% display: 68% mobility: 92% workmanship: 92% ergonomy: 83% emissions: 83%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/07/2011
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 81% features: 74% display: 80% mobility: 88% ergonomy: 83% emissions: 77%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/07/2011
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 81% features: 74% display: 80% mobility: 88% ergonomy: 83% emissions: 77%
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/01/2011
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 71% performance: 67% features: 63% display: 95% mobility: 76% ergonomy: 79%
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/01/2011
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 71% performance: 67% features: 63% display: 95% mobility: 76% ergonomy: 79%
Source: ZDNet
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/29/2011
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 70%
Source: ZDNet
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/29/2011
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→EN Archive.org versiongood but not perfect; small keys, low battery time, slow SSD; positve: matte display, flat, light, lot of connection options
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2012
Source: Netzwelt
DE→EN Archive.org versiongood but not perfect; small keys, low battery time, slow SSD; positve: matte display, flat, light, lot of connection options
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2012
Source: Focus Online
DE→EN Archive.org versionespecially light and good
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/09/2012
Source: Focus Online
DE→EN Archive.org versionespecially light and good
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/09/2012
Source: Tom's Hardware
DE→EN Archive.org versionfast but small SSD, dark display with small resolution, good equipment, loud fan
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 01/26/2012
Source: Tom's Hardware
DE→EN Archive.org versionfast but small SSD, dark display with small resolution, good equipment, loud fan
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 01/26/2012
Toshiba Satellite Z830-10U
Specifications
Notebook: Toshiba Satellite Z830-10UProcessor: Intel Core i5 2467M
Graphics Adapter: Intel HD Graphics 3000
Display: 13.30 inch, 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixels
Weight: 1.1kg
Price: 1300 euro
Links: Toshiba homepage Toshiba notebook section Satellite Z830 (Series) Satellite Z830-10U (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionThe Toshiba Satellite Z830-10U costs less than the Portégé Z830-10P and has better hardware specifications. Business users will have to swallow the difference though in order to get Windows 7 Professional. For anyone else, the Satellite is the best option of the two Toshibas this month.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/02/2012
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% features: 80% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews
Archive.org versionWith the Z830, Toshiba has created one of the lightest and most affordable Ultrabooks on the market, yet it’s packed with connectivity, sports a matt screen, and offers premium touches like a backlit keyboard. Unfortunately, its staid design limits its visual appeal compared to rivals, its keyboard doesn’t provide the best typing experience, and poor viewing angles let the 13.3in screen down badly. Like most Ultrabooks we’ve seen, it comes close, but no cigar.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/25/2012
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 60% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 70%
Source: CNet
Archive.org versionUltrabook city is booming, with every computer manufacturer arriving in town on the back of an Intel-powered cart, hoping to strike a rich vein of laptop gold. The Toshiba Satellite Z830 may be slim and light, but it fails to beat its ultrabook competitors in power, build quality and battery life. Your £1,000 would be better spent elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/05/2012
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionThe Satellite Pro Z830-10U is one of the best ultrabooks we've yet seen, and certain features, such as connectivity and touchpad usability, outshine all its rivals. However, there are still niggling issues such as build quality and excessive bloatware that mar the whole experience. This is certainly a great piece of kit from Toshiba, but it feels like an extra step onwards from the Portege rather than the completely different computing experience the Asus Zenbook provides. Extra pressure from evolving tablets such as the Asus Transformer Prime also gives us something to consider.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/19/2011
Rating: Total score: 80%
Comment
Toshiba: Toshiba Corporation is a Japanese conglomerate or technology group. The company was established in 1939 and in 1978 Toshiba became the official company name. The company's products and services include power, industrial and social infrastructure systems, elevators and escalators, electronic components, semiconductors, hard drives, printers, batteries, lighting, logistics and information technology. Toshiba was one of the largest manufacturers of personal computers, consumer electronics, home appliances and medical equipment.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
Intel HD Graphics 3000: Integrated graphics card in the Intel Sandy Bridge processors (Core ix-2xxx). The HD 3000 is the faster (internally GT2 called) version with 12 Execution Units (EUs).
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core i3:
2367M: Power efficient ULV processor clocked at 1.4 GHz without Turbo boost. Offers an integrated HD 3000 clocked at slow 350 / 1000 MHz and a DDR3-1333 memory controller.
Intel Core i5:
2467M: Power saving ULV processor clocked at 1.6-2.3 GHz due to Turbo boost. Offers an integrated HD 3000 clocked at slow 350 / 1150 MHz and a DDR3-1333 memory controller.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
78.71%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.











