Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 test smartphone

The fastest flip smartphone of 2025 with Leica cameras – Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 review

A benchmark for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7?

Xiaomi's latest flip smartphone impresses with a large battery and the Snapdragon 8 Elite. This makes it the most powerful flip phone of the year, even compared with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7. But is it also the best?
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Louise Burke (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android Foldable Smartphone

Verdict on the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2

Despite its foldable design, the Mix Flip 2 delivers flagship-level performance in many areas and stands out as one of the best flip phones of the year. Xiaomi's compact foldable combines one of the fastest smartphone SoCs with comparatively low throttling, long battery life and a bright LTPO OLED panel with an adaptive refresh rate.

However, the foldable form factor still requires compromises in certain areas, such as connectivity (including USB 2.0) and the cameras. When folded, we would also have preferred a slimmer design, similar to fold-style smartphones.

Another drawback at this price point is Xiaomi's unclear update policy, at least for the Chinese-market model.

Pros

+ high-quality housing
+ long battery life
+ fast charging
+ strong SoC
+ bright OLED panel

Cons

- not waterproof
- questionable update policy (Chinese-market version)
- limited availability so far
- only USB 2.0

Price and availability of the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2

The Mix Flip 2 is currently available only in China. The base model with 256 GB of storage and 12 GB of RAM is priced at 6,000 yuan, which equates to about 720 euros or $785 USD. As an import, Trading Shenzhen lists the device starting at around 870 euros or $950 USD. Since the first generation was officially released in Europe, it is likely that the successor will also see a global launch.

Amazon Logo
$8.99
QWFORQW [2+2 Pack for Xiaomi Mix Flip/Flip 2 Screen Protector + Camera Lens Protector Tempered Glass, 9H HD Anti-Scratch Case Friendly for Xiaomi Mix Flip/Flip 2 Tempered Glass Film (Black border)
  • $8.99
    QWFORQW [3 Pack Screen Protector for Xiaomi Mix Flip/Flip 2, Hydrogel Film [High Sensitivity, Not Glass, HD] Xiaomi Mix Flip/Flip 2 Protector Film
  • $6.99
    QWFORQW 2 Pack Camera Lens Protector for Xiaomi Mix Flip/Flip 2, [Alloy Ring, Anti-Glare, 9H, Case-Friendly] Tempered Glass for Xiaomi Mix Flip/Flip 2 Camera Lens Cover Accessories (Color)

Specifications of the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2

Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 (Mix Flip Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.86 inch 21.4:9, 2912 x 1224 pixel 460 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, Cover display: 4.01" AMOLED, 1.392x1.208, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 479 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 5G: n1 / n2 / n3 / n5 / n7 / n8 / n12 / n20 / n26 / n28 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n77 / n78 / n80 / n81 / n83 / n84 / n89; 4G: FDD-LTE: B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28 / B66, TDD-LTE: B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B48; 3G: B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 2G: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 166.9 x 73.8 ( = 0.3 x 6.57 x 2.91 in)
Battery
5165 mAh Silicon-Carbon
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.7, 23 mm, Light Hunter 800, OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.2, 14 mm, wide)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 21 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, case, charger, USB cable, HyperOS, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
199 g ( = 7.02 oz / 0.44 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
970 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Build and features – Android smartphone in various colours

Standard colours of the Mix Flip 2
Standard colours of the Mix Flip 2
Customised variants of the Mix Flip 2
Customised variants of the Mix Flip 2

The Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 impresses with excellent build quality. The crease in the inner display is perceptible to the touch but barely noticeable in everyday use. The metal frame not only provides a premium feel but also enhances the phone's high-end appearance. Dimensions remain almost unchanged compared to the predecessor, with only a slight increase in weight.

The Mix Flip 2 is available in a wide range of colour options. As with the previous model, an IP54 rating for protection against dust and splashes is likely, although this has so far only been confirmed for the global version and not for our test unit.

In terms of features, the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 includes an IR blaster, dual-band GNSS, Bluetooth 5.4, dual SIM functionality, stereo speakers and NFC. Users who require eSIM support or a German-language interface should wait, as the China ROM does not support either.

The USB-C port is a notable drawback, as it remains limited to USB 2.0 speeds, which is disappointing at this price point.

Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 test smartphone
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 test smartphone
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 test smartphone
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 test smartphone
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 test smartphone

Size comparison

171.5 mm / 6.75 in 74 mm / 2.91 in 7.2 mm / 0.2835 in 199 g0.4387 lbs167.5 mm / 6.59 in 74.02 mm / 2.91 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 190 g0.4189 lbs166.9 mm / 6.57 in 73.8 mm / 2.91 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 199 g0.4387 lbs167.3 mm / 6.59 in 75.6 mm / 2.98 in 7.15 mm / 0.2815 in 193 g0.4255 lbs165.1 mm / 6.5 in 71.9 mm / 2.83 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 187 g0.4123 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Communication and operation with 5G and LTE Band 20

The Mix Flip 2 comes with modern Wi-Fi 7 including MU-MIMO support. Despite making use of the 6 GHz band, real-world speeds fall slightly short of expectations. Paired with an Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 router, we measured an average throughput of around 1,300 Mbit/s, which is good, but not outstanding.

The Chinese-market model already supports LTE bands 20 and 28 as well as a wide range of 5G bands. This makes importing the device an attractive option for those who do not want to wait for the global version.

Both the inner 6.86-inch foldable screen and the small 4-inch cover display are responsive and benefit from a 120 Hz refresh rate, which ensures smooth operation. The front panel supports a number of apps, including some third-party ones, but it still cannot fully replace the main display.

For biometric security, a fast fingerprint sensor is integrated into the power button, and there is also a 2D face unlock function.

Networking
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
520 (min: 309) MBit/s ∼29%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1333 (min: 920) MBit/s ∼78%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1093 (min: 997) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1712 (min: 1621) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
723 (min: 659) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
623 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1816 (min: 900) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1501 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼88%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1001 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
968 (min: 784) MBit/s ∼89%
Honor Magic V Flip
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
716 (min: 324) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
898 (min: 631) MBit/s ∼83%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1019 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1088 (min: 768) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1265 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
724 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
736 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1398 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼82%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø520 (309-676)
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1333 (920-1573)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1001 (904-1017)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø963 (784-992)

Software and sustainability – compact phone with Android 15

The Mix Flip 2 runs Xiaomi's in-house HyperOS 2, which is based on Android 15. As is typical of the Chinese-market model, the software offers only limited language packs and does not support Android Auto.

No details are provided regarding the duration of software updates. However, a global version would benefit from the new EU directive, which requires software support until at least 2031.

Exact information on the materials used or an official carbon footprint is not available, making it difficult to assess the smartphone's overall environmental impact.

Cameras – flip smartphone with Leica collaboration

Selfie with the Mix Flip 2
Selfie with the Mix Flip 2

The Mix Flip 2 benefits from Xiaomi's partnership with Leica, featuring a 50-MP main camera with the Light Hunter 800 sensor and OIS. This combination delivers high dynamic range and pleasing sharpness, producing good results even in challenging lighting conditions. Thanks to the foldable form factor, photos and videos can also be taken conveniently with the rear cameras via the cover screen.

Unlike the original Mix Flip, Xiaomi has dropped the 2x telephoto lens this time, opting instead for an ultra-wide-angle unit alongside the 23-mm main camera. This choice makes sense, as the telephoto lens on the predecessor failed to impress in our tests. While the 50-MP ultra-wide-angle camera is not exceptional for this price range, it provides solid image quality and rounds out the camera setup well.

0,6x
0,6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10x
10x
20x (max)
20x (max)

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightUltraweitwinkel
ColorChecker
15.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2 ∆E
11 ∆E
9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mix Flip 2: 8.61 ∆E min: 2.03 - max: 15.36 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.2 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
33 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
37.7 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
47.3 ∆E
47.3 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
34 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
45.5 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mix Flip 2: 32.23 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 47.34 ∆E

Display – Xiaomi relies on OLED panels

Sub-pixel structure
Sub-pixel structure

In terms of display sizes, resolutions and refresh rates, the Mix Flip 2 remains unchanged compared with the first generation. The main display still measures 6.86 inches and features a rather elongated 21.4:9 aspect ratio.

On the positive side, peak brightness in the more realistic APL18 measurement reaches an impressive 2,552 cd/m². This ensures that the LTPO panel is bright enough to deliver first-class HDR effects.

According to the manufacturer, the 4.01-inch cover display should achieve brightness levels similar to those of the inner screen. In our test, however, we measured only around 652 cd/m². As is typical for OLED, PWM is used for brightness control.

1019
cd/m²
1035
cd/m²
1064
cd/m²
1025
cd/m²
1077
cd/m²
1028
cd/m²
1019
cd/m²
1039
cd/m²
1022
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1077 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1036.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.27 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1077 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.11 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.155
CCT: 6275 K
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
AMOLED, 2912x1224, 6.9"
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
AMOLED, 2992x1224, 7"
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2640x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Mix Flip
AMOLED, 2912x1224, 6.9"
Honor Magic V Flip
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.8"
Screen
33%
-3%
-23%
35%
Brightness middle
1077
1379
28%
1210
12%
949
-12%
1529
42%
Brightness
1036
1393
34%
1221
18%
949
-8%
1535
48%
Brightness Distribution
95
93
-2%
98
3%
98
3%
97
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.11
1.05
50%
3.1
-47%
2.1
-0%
1.3
38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.62
1.79
51%
4.2
-16%
5.6
-55%
2.1
42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
1.4
39%
2
13%
3.8
-65%
1.5
35%
Gamma
2.155 102%
2.124 104%
2.05 107%
2.25 98%
2.22 99%
CCT
6275 104%
6362 102%
6666 98%
6826 95%
6303 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 121 Hz
Amplitude: 19 %

The display backlight flickers at 121 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 121 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8291 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Minimum brightness
Minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings. (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness.)
 

Using CalMAN software and a spectrophotometer, the flexible OLED panel demonstrates good calibration for both colours and greyscales, with low DeltaE values remaining within the ideal range (<3).

Colour accuracy (profile: advanced, target colour space: sRGB)
Colour accuracy (profile: advanced, target colour space: sRGB)
Colour space (profile: advanced, target colour space: sRGB)
Colour space (profile: advanced, target colour space: sRGB)
Greyscale (profile: advanced, target colour space: sRGB)
Greyscale (profile: advanced, target colour space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).

Performance, emissions and battery life – flip phone with high-end processor

The Mix Flip 2 is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite and benefits from a dual vapour-chamber cooling system. As a result, the Xiaomi phone throttles noticeably less in 3DMark stress tests than many of its rivals. In benchmarks, the Mix Flip 2 even edges ahead of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra.

Despite its compact flip form factor, battery capacity has grown to a respectable 5,165 mAh. The foldable also supports 67 W wired charging and 50 W wireless charging. In our real-world battery test, the Mix Flip 2 lasted almost 20 hours, making it the longest-running flip phone we have tested so far. Users should have no trouble getting through a full day without recharging.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3084 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2309 - 3228, n=25)
3042 Points -1%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2987 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2072 Points -33%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1911 Points -38%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1700 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=206, last 2 years)
1647 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9183 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7656 - 10401, n=25)
9157 Points 0%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
7784 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6354 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6099 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=206, last 2 years)
4779 Points -48%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4277 Points -53%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
21353 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14378 - 27428, n=21)
20886 Points -2%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19338 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18983 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18121 Points -15%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15809 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=191, last 2 years)
14387 Points -33%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
25743 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (19436 - 28053, n=22)
24229 Points -6%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
21674 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18949 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15108 Points -41%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11056 Points -57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 28053, n=189, last 2 years)
10229 Points -60%
Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
6538 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (5230 - 7094, n=22)
6202 Points -5%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
5456 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
4912 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
3967 Points -39%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2823 Points -57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 7094, n=192, last 2 years)
2714 Points -58%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
6593 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (4852 - 7212, n=22)
6160 Points -7%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
4852 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
4739 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
3991 Points -39%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2778 Points -58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 7212, n=191, last 2 years)
2698 Points -59%
Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11812 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8405 - 13318, n=21)
10990 Points -7%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8405 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2799 - 13318, n=84, last 2 years)
8138 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7270 Points -38%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6765 Points -43%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points -100%
Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11835 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8386 - 13244, n=21)
10885 Points -8%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8386 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3223 - 13244, n=84, last 2 years)
8086 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
8046 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6788 Points -43%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points -100%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
120 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
119 fps +1%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
118 fps
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
108 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (50 - 166, n=23)
94.4 fps -20%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
84 fps -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 166, n=203, last 2 years)
57.4 fps -51%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (166 - 332, n=23)
246 fps +10%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
223 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
201 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
201 fps -10%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
171 fps -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 332, n=203, last 2 years)
108.2 fps -51%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
103 fps -54%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
105 fps +28%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
96 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (45 - 144, n=23)
82.4 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
82 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
82 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
61 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=204, last 2 years)
45 fps -45%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (58 - 118, n=23)
95.2 fps +21%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
79 fps
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
78 fps -1%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
73 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
67 fps -15%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
45 fps -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 129, n=203, last 2 years)
42.4 fps -46%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (26 - 53, n=23)
44.4 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
40 fps +14%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
38 fps +9%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
37 fps +6%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
35 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
23 fps -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 53, n=204, last 2 years)
19.8 fps -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
93742 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
72835 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (25448 - 95506, n=21)
70318 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
45541 Points -51%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
40904 Points -56%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
33543 Points -64%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.4
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
625 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (231 - 1131, n=19, last 2 years)
537 Points -14%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
516 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (246 - 676, n=6)
499 Points -20%
Half Precision NPU 1.4
Average of class Smartphone
  (231 - 4555, n=19, last 2 years)
1074 Points +70%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
633 Points
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
505 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (249 - 669, n=6)
504 Points -20%
Quantized NPU 1.4
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 4549, n=19, last 2 years)
1731 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1274 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (508 - 1576, n=6)
1089 Points -15%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1088 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Motorola Razr 60 UltraSamsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GXiaomi Mix FlipHonor Magic V FlipAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-21%
-22%
-3%
-46%
-6%
-41%
Sequential Read 256KB
4083.53
3504.7
-14%
3930.68
-4%
4063.4
0%
1947.4
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
3894.12
3450.9
-11%
2603.84
-33%
3332.67
-14%
1672.06
-57%
Random Read 4KB
403.94
308.6
-24%
445.5
10%
367.24
-9%
277.55
-31%
Random Write 4KB
534.73
347
-35%
202.97
-62%
587.21
10%
297.97
-44%
Max. Load
 49.2 °C
121 F
42 °C
108 F
37 °C
99 F
 
 48.5 °C
119 F
48.1 °C
119 F
46.7 °C
116 F
 
 48.7 °C
120 F
48.9 °C
120 F
39.6 °C
103 F
 
Maximum: 49.2 °C = 121 F
Average: 45.4 °C = 114 F
33.7 °C
93 F
35.5 °C
96 F
44.6 °C
112 F
33.8 °C
93 F
37 °C
99 F
47.4 °C
117 F
33.2 °C
92 F
37.1 °C
99 F
46.6 °C
116 F
Maximum: 47.4 °C = 117 F
Average: 38.8 °C = 102 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 19 °C = 66 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
85.8 %
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.9 % -31%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.8 % -36%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37.7 % -56%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
81.7 %
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.5 % -15%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60.6 % -26%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.6 % -31%
05101520253035Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø34.3 (33.2-38.7)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.4 (14.6-24.8)
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø33.3 (31.9-39)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø18.2 (13.7-22.6)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.643.42538.140.53131.4324034.333.85036.338.86329.226.38020.624.710022.734.312521.44216021.547.220019.651.225016.155.531514.859.940013.757.850016.861.963022.270.180022.968.3100018.276.6125015.475.8160017.376.3200015.876.8250015.373.1315016.575.1400018.675.250002467.4630022.666.8800025.671.61000021.571.61250023.171.61600022.857SPL32.685.8N1.663.6median 19.6median 68.3Delta3.68.132.436.834.135.626.927.434.332.437.436.724.930.920.628.324.529.717.636.715.844.511.645.91052.114.356.37.959.36.566.48.169.58.669.210.575.98.780.89.876.79.272.19.4749.878.79.382.89.579.410.375.410.8721170.611.166.110.861.322.389.20.475median 10median 70.61.79.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mix Flip 2Xiaomi Mix Flip
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mix Flip audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 138)
19h 58min
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
5165 mAh
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
4700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mix Flip
4780 mAh
Honor Magic V Flip
4800 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
1198
922
-23%
929
-22%
893
-25%
1159
-3%

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Mix Flip 2 ranks among the top flip phones of the year, and quite possibly takes the crown. With any luck, Xiaomi will extend availability to global markets.

Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 - 08/15/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
51 / 69 → 74%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
47 / 55 → 85%
Application Performance
82 / 85 → 96%
AI Performance
40%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 85%
Camera
79%
Average
64%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
50%
Repairability
25%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 37.5%

Alternative options at a glance

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
85.9%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.99
QWFORQW [2+2 Pack for Xiaomi...
2. $8.99
QWFORQW [3 Pack Screen Prote...
3. $6.99
QWFORQW 2 Pack Camera Lens P...
List Price: 970€
199 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.86"
2912x1224
460 PPI
AMOLED
2.
83.1%
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: $1,099.99
List Price: 1299€
199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.00"
2992x1224
462 PPI
AMOLED
3.
84.7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: $1,219.99
List Price: 1319€
187 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
2640x1080
426 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4.
83.3%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.99
QWFORQW [2+2 Pack for Xiaomi...
2. $8.99
QWFORQW [3 Pack Screen Prote...
3. $6.99
QWFORQW 2 Pack Camera Lens P...
List Price: 1299€
190 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.86"
2912x1224
460 PPI
AMOLED
5.
80.2%
Honor Magic V Flip
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 730 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $24.95
BoxWave Keyboard Compatible ...
2. $16.95
BoxWave Cable Compatible wit...
3. $14.95
BoxWave Stand and Mount Comp...
193 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"
2520x1080
403 PPI
OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 3 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > The fastest flip smartphone of 2025 with Leica cameras – Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 review
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-08-19 (Update: 2025-08-19)