Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC Tangula T770 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720

UNISOC Tangula T770

► remove from comparison Tangula T770

The Unisoc T770 Tanggula (former Spreadtrum) is a mid range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates an octa-core CPU with three clusters. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 clocked at up to 2.5 GHz, three more A76 performance cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz and a power efficiency cluster of four ARM-Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4/4X with up to 2133 MHz (2x 16 Bit). The integrated ISP supports two main cameras and two subsidiary cameras (up to 108 MPix). The integrated graphics card is an ARM Mali-G57 MC4 (4 cores) at up to 780 MHz. Unisoc also specifies that the T770 offers hardware AI acceleration.

The chip is manufactured in the modern 6nm process.

MediaTek Dimensity 720

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 720

The Mediatek Dimensity 720 is a mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes four fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores and four power efficient Cortex-A55 cores, all clocked at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 3 core ARM Mali-G57 MC3 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller, a AI processing unit (APU) and video de- and encoding. Compared to the faster Dimensity 820, the CPU cores are lower clocked and the GPU offers less cores. Furthermore, all other features were slightly restricted (e.g. max. 12 GB RAM).

The Dimensity 720 is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

show full text
ModelUNISOC Tangula T770MediaTek Dimensity 720
Series Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A76 / A55
Series: Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
» UNISOC Tangula T7702 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7202 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T760 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7702 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
» MediaTek Dimensity 7202 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T760 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
Clock2000 - 2500 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm7 nm
FeaturesISP (2 main + 2 subsidiary, 108M 4-in-1, 64M ZSL)4x ARM Cortex-A76 (2 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G57 MC3, APU 3.0, 5G Modem, MiraVision (4K30 Video, 64MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 12GB LPDDR4x Support
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP4 ( - 780 MHz)ARM Mali-G57 MP3
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
ManufacturerMediatek Dimensity 720

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 720
30.2 pt (51%)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T -65%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 -13%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 -13%
Mediatek Helio G88 -9%
UNISOC T610 -9%
Mediatek Helio P70 -8%
Mediatek Helio G85 -5%
UNISOC Tangula T700 -3%
Mediatek Helio G80 -3%
Mediatek Helio P90 -3%
MediaTek Dimensity 720
Mediatek Helio G70 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 6%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 10%
MediaTek Dimensity 700 13%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G 15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G 15%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 94%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13664 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2901     avg: 3042     median: 3037 (38%)     max: 3189 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3014     avg: 3045     median: 3018 (44%)     max: 3102 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
622 Points (30%)
min: 472     avg: 499.7     median: 511 (25%)     max: 516 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2226 Points (8%)
min: 1511     avg: 1592     median: 1627 (6%)     max: 1638 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2763 Points (32%)
2363 Points (27%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8087 Points (10%)
6182 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2475     avg: 3334     median: 3467 (4%)     max: 4059 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 14156     avg: 15560     median: 14886 (15%)     max: 17637 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 49     avg: 52.3     median: 51 (13%)     max: 57 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 47476     avg: 52873     median: 52872.5 (44%)     max: 58269 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 42094     avg: 51085     median: 51084.5 (41%)     max: 60075 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 60295     avg: 63084     median: 63084 (12%)     max: 65873 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 84462     avg: 85620     median: 85619.5 (31%)     max: 86777 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 252308     avg: 252661     median: 252660 (24%)     max: 253013 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
176204 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
14932 Points (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
8694 Points (47%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2711     avg: 2821     median: 2820.5 (15%)     max: 2930 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 13793     avg: 14162     median: 14161.5 (30%)     max: 14530 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6145     avg: 6770     median: 6770 (44%)     max: 7395 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7158     avg: 8916     median: 8915.5 (45%)     max: 10673 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.5 Watt (11%)
00.20.50.70.91.21.41.71.92.12.42.62.83.13.33.53.844.34.5Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
0.9 Watt (3%)
00.10.10.20.20.30.40.40.50.50.60.70.70.80.80.9111.11.1Tooltip

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 720 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 05. 21:55:32

#0 checking url part for id 14025 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12994 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.041s ... 0.048s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.051s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.051s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 14025 +0s ... 0.052s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#19 got single benchmarks 14025 +0.005s ... 0.057s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.061s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 12994 +0.001s ... 0.062s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#24 got single benchmarks 12994 +0.008s ... 0.07s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.074s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.078s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.078s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.079s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.079s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#44 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.08s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.083s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.083s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.084s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.088s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.089s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.09s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.01s ... 0.1s

#78 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.104s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.024s ... 0.128s

#80 return log +0.004s ... 0.132s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)