Notebookcheck Logo

Unisoc T9100 (T820) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Unisoc T9100 (T820)

► remove from comparison UNISOC T9100 (T820)

The Unisoc T9100 (formely Unisoc T820) is a mid range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates an octa-core CPU with three clusters. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 clocked at up to 2.7 GHz, three more A76 performance cores clocked at up to 2.3 GHz and a power efficiency cluster of four ARM-Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2.1 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4/4X with up to 2133 MHz (2x 16 Bit). The integrated ISP supports two main cameras and two subsidiary cameras (up to 108 MPix). The integrated graphics card is an ARM Mali-G57 MC4 (4 cores) at up to 850 MHz. Unisoc also specifies that the T9100 offers hardware AI acceleration with up to 8.0 TOPS peak performance of the NPU.

The chip is manufactured on the modern 6nm EUV process.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

ModelUnisoc T9100 (T820)Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Kryo 260
Clock2100 - 2700 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm11 nm
FeaturesISP (2 main + 2 subsidiary, 108M 9-in-1, 64M ZSL)Adreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISP
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP4 ( - 850 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 610
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 1 compare1.8 - 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (15%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1588     avg: 2240     median: 2272 (21%)     max: 2534 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 2146     avg: 2330     median: 2384 (27%)     max: 2502 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (8%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
891 Points (28%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
2450 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
639 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
2283 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2857 Points (29%)
1472 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8410 Points (8%)
4938 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (6%)     max: 10247 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (9%)     max: 59 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 26857     avg: 35819     median: 37388 (31%)     max: 38718 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 32579     avg: 37486     median: 34946 (28%)     max: 46499 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 25724     avg: 33052     median: 33402 (6%)     max: 43315 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 68508     avg: 70945     median: 71065 (26%)     max: 72576 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
473609 Points (23%)
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (10%)     max: 211557 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
139602 Points (35%)
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (16%)     max: 68731 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
586223 Points (17%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
187892 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 662 +
16222 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (14%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (7%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (10%)     max: 426 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (5%)     max: 12884 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (20%)     max: 7554 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 5866     avg: 6258     median: 6139 (40%)     max: 7184 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 7247     avg: 7986     median: 8000.5 (40%)     max: 8714 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (12%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (1%)     max: 1.953 Watt

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T9100 (T820) → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 51% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 09. 04:50:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14598 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1762660238s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 Nov 2025 05:20:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14598 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 14598 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.014s ... 0.025s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.043s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.043s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)