The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. Compared to the C2D T5670, the T5600 features Virtualization functions VT-x, but lacks Idle Stats (according to the Intel HP).
The Core 2 Duo T7600 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7600 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7600 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient (due to the 45nm process).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100%n=12
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 → 88%n=12
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 → 105%n=12
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 05. 01:15:30
#0 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 171 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 162 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.003s ... 0.027s
#8 got single benchmarks 164 +0.04s ... 0.067s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 171 +0.003s ... 0.07s
#10 got single benchmarks 171 +0.035s ... 0.105s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 162 +0.003s ... 0.109s
#12 got single benchmarks 162 +0.025s ... 0.133s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.133s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.098s ... 0.231s