Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5550

Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache nad Virtualization functions VT-x.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5550

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom-2M core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. It does not support Virtualization functions VT-x of the Merom core and offers only a low clock speed and 2MB level 2 cache.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7300Intel Core 2 Duo T5550
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1830 MHz
FSB800667
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm65 nm1.075V-1.250V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$234 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7300Intel Core 2 Duo T5550

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1971     avg: 2040     median: 2040 (18%)     max: 2109 Points
1826 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3600     avg: 3733     median: 3732.5 (5%)     max: 3865 Points
3397 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1194     avg: 1680     median: 1729 (4%)     max: 1764 Points
1484 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T7300 +
min: 23     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (5%)     max: 24.48 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T7300 +
min: 56     avg: 58.2     median: 59 (3%)     max: 59.7 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7300 +
min: 1433     avg: 1488     median: 1487.5 (7%)     max: 1542 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T7300 +
18090 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T7300 +
12664 MFLOPS (10%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3396     avg: 4396     median: 4297.5 (27%)     max: 5250 Points
3891 Points (24%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.9 Points (70%)
4.8 Points (69%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T7300 +
3473 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 → 91% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 03. 16:08:08

#0 checking url part for id 324 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 390 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 324 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#41 got single benchmarks 324 +0.033s ... 0.04s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 390 +0s ... 0.04s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#44 got single benchmarks 390 +0.009s ... 0.049s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.05s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.054s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#87 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.056s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.025s ... 0.081s

#89 return log +0.004s ... 0.085s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)