Notebookcheck Logo

Unisoc T7225 (T612) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Unisoc T7225 (T612)

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7225 (T612)

The Unisoc T7225 (formerly Unisoc T612) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4/4X-1600 memory controller, an ARM Mali G52MP1 GPU at 614 MHz and a tri core ISP (24, 8 and 8 MPixels max). Compared to the Unisoc T610, the T7225 offers one GPU core less (G52 MC1 versus MC2).

The chip is manufactured by TSMC on 12nm FinFET process.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

ModelUnisoc T7225 (T612)Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Kryo 260
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm11 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISP
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.unisoc.comwww.qualcomm.com
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 1 compare1.8 - 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 610

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2909     avg: 2944     median: 2939 (28%)     max: 2990 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2933     avg: 2938     median: 2937.5 (34%)     max: 2942 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (8%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 344     avg: 346     median: 346 (14%)     max: 347 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1311     avg: 1340     median: 1323 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
1472 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
4938 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5404 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1598 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2973 ms (3%)
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
12581 Points (10%)
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (7%)     max: 10247 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
46 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
73 Points (13%)
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (9%)     max: 59 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 26857     avg: 35819     median: 37388 (31%)     max: 38718 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 32579     avg: 37486     median: 34946 (28%)     max: 46499 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 25724     avg: 33052     median: 33402 (6%)     max: 43315 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 68508     avg: 70945     median: 71065 (26%)     max: 72576 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
196368 Points (10%)
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (10%)     max: 211557 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
68374 Points (17%)
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (16%)     max: 68731 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
2969 Points (0%)
16222 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 11681     avg: 13404     median: 13404 (6%)     max: 15127 Points
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (5%)     max: 12884 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 6566     avg: 7419     median: 7610 (28%)     max: 7776 Points
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (21%)     max: 7554 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (15%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (7%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 5866     avg: 6258     median: 6139 (40%)     max: 7184 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 7247     avg: 7986     median: 8000.5 (40%)     max: 8714 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
365 Points (14%)
328 Points (12%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.37     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.99 Watt
144%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.121     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.68 Watt
116%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7225 (T612) → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 119% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 27. 08:49:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753598990s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Jul 2025 05:17:52 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.008s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.012s ... 0.031s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.056s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.056s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)