Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 vs Intel Core i5-8279U vs Intel Core i5-8257U

Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6570, the T6500 does not offer Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at consumer notebooks.

The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6500.

Intel Core i5-8279U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8279U is a quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in the first quarter of 2019. Compared to its predecessor Core i5-7287U, the CPU is now a quad-core with Hyperthreading support for the execution of up to 8 threads simultaneously. The base frequency is 2.4 GHz, but the Turbo goes all the way up to 4.1 GHz. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors. 

Compared to faster Core i7 model (e.g. Core i7-8559U) with eDRAM and 28 Watts, the i5-8279U only features 6 MB smart cache and a slower clock of the Iris Plus GPU.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Considering the clocks of the Core i5-8259U, its performance should be between above the 15W model Core i7-8650U. The i5-82769U should still be faster than the i7-8650U in practice thanks to the increased TDP, especially during sustained workloads. Compared to the similar named Intel Core i5-8269U, the 8279U offers a slightly lower performance (-200 MHz Turbo, -100 MHz base) although the name suggests otherwise.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1150 MHz and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for quad-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

Intel Core i5-8257U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8257U is a quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture that was announced in the new entry level MacBook Pro 13 in mid 2019. Compared to its predecessor, the CPU is now a quad-core with Hyperthreading support for the execution of up to 8 threads simultaneously. The base frequency is only 1.4 GHz, but the Turbo goes all the way up to 3.9 GHz. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to faster Core i7-8557U model with eDRAM and 15 Watts, the i5-8257U only features 6 MB smart cache and the slowest clock of the Iris Plus GPU.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Thanks to the relative high Turbo Boost clock, the single thread performance should be very good, but still behind the faster i7 model. The short burst all core performance is clearly better compared to the old dual core predecessors thanks to the additional cores. In sustained workloads, the performance is usually limited by the TDP and cooling. In these workloads the difference to the Core i7 should be also smaller.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 645 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Coffee Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm++ process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 15 Watts and therefore suited for thin and light laptops.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T6500Intel Core i5-8279UIntel Core i5-8257U
CodenamePenrynCoffee Lake-UCoffee Lake-U
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-U
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 « 2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-8559U2.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8557U1.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8269U2.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8279U « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8259U2.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8257U1.4 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8109U3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8559U2.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8557U1.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8269U2.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8279U2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8259U2.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8257U « 1.4 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8109U3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2100 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz1400 - 3900 MHz
FSB800
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 84 / 8
TDP35 Watt28 Watt15 Watt
Transistors410 Million
Technology45 nm14 nm14 nm
Die Size107 mm2
SocketPGA478FCBGA1528FCBGA1528
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 (300 - 1050 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8257U
26.5 pt (44%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
4033 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1003 Points (42%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
421 Points (46%)
min: 388     avg: 393     median: 393 (43%)     max: 398 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1717 Points (4%)
min: 1494     avg: 1520     median: 1519.5 (4%)     max: 1545 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 743     avg: 750     median: 750 (5%)     max: 757 Points
min: 629     avg: 634     median: 633.5 (4%)     max: 638 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 166     avg: 167.5     median: 167.5 (46%)     max: 169 Points
min: 156     avg: 157.7     median: 157.7 (44%)     max: 159.3 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
8.3 Points (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.9 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 2197     avg: 2283     median: 2249 (14%)     max: 2487 Points
6551 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 3800     avg: 4254     median: 4262 (3%)     max: 4757 Points
24096 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 1158     avg: 1172     median: 1171.5 (14%)     max: 1185 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 36.5     avg: 36.9     median: 37.1 (7%)     max: 37.24 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5862 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
22683 MIPS (13%)
19620 MIPS (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4276 MIPS (50%)
4083 MIPS (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
45.7 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
190 fps (5%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6 fps (11%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
627 Seconds (4%)
714 Seconds (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 1768     avg: 1856     median: 1879 (4%)     max: 1887 Points
8830 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 22     avg: 24.2     median: 24.5 (5%)     max: 25.58 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 54     avg: 58.3     median: 58.5 (3%)     max: 62.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 1339     avg: 1348     median: 1341 (6%)     max: 1363 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T6500 +
19458 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T6500 +
15381 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 4087     avg: 4922     median: 5278 (11%)     max: 5522 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 5     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (73%)     max: 5.1 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 3945     avg: 4015     median: 4014.5 (3%)     max: 4084 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
7866 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
21476 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
21581 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
24185 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7017 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
10411 Points (19%)
8936 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3439 Points (14%)
2740 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1312 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
4743 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
948 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
3858 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
989 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4181 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4850 Points (48%)
4608 Points (46%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
17643 Points (17%)
16580 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
740 ms (1%)
min: 901     avg: 914     median: 913.5 (1%)     max: 926 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
44259 Points (32%)
min: 38704     avg: 39388     median: 39387.5 (29%)     max: 40071 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
210 Points (38%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8279U → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8257U → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 09. 20:01:46

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 453 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11503 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11433 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760032906s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 453 +0s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 453 +0.008s ... 0.012s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11503 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#11 got single benchmarks 11503 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11433 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#13 got single benchmarks 11433 +0.004s ... 0.025s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.053s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)