The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.86 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core.
The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 is a power efficient subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is limited.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 → 100%n=15
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 → 85%n=15
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 107%n=15
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 26. 15:54:42
#0 checking url part for id 422 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 424 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 422 +0.003s ... 0.027s
#8 got single benchmarks 422 +0.014s ... 0.041s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 424 +0.002s ... 0.043s
#10 got single benchmarks 424 +0.031s ... 0.074s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0.003s ... 0.077s
#12 got single benchmarks 466 +0.017s ... 0.093s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.093s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.11s ... 0.204s