Review Dell Latitude XT3 Convertible
For the original German review, see here.
Like HP's EliteBook 2760p, the planned product cycle of Dell's Business Convertible is longer than average. That means the device will be available for a longer period, but it also means the PC has fewer pieces of up-to-date equipment, especially when it goes into its second year on the market. Dell's Latitude XT3 is currently in this second year and is thus equipped with an Intel CPU from the Sandy Bridge generation. Unlike the HP EliteBook 2760p however, the Latitude XT3's case has been renovated and now has a new 16:9 format and up-to-date connectivity options. Our test model was outfitted with an Intel Core i7-2640M CPU, an Intel HD Graphics 3000, 8 GB of RAM, a hard drive and of course Windows 7 Professional.
The "Tri-metal" case, as Dell refers to it, only shows its metal surfaces here and there. The case gets its high degree of stability mostly from its interior construction. It fulfills various test norms according to the US military's Test Method Standard MIL-STD-810G. The inner frame of the display and the keyboard area appear to be made of a dark gray plastic, which lends to the device's rugged look. The palm rest is completely firm, and we didn't find any weak spots in the case anywhere.
While most of the current Latitude computers lack the old reddish-orange embellishment around the keyboard, the Latitude XT3 still has it. Whether that's a pleasing aesthetic is of course a matter of taste. We don't find the design element to be particularly obtrusive, nor do we consider it inappropriate for use in business contexts.
On the underside of the case you'll find the battery bay and a large maintenance hatch. To open the maintenance hatch you first have to remove the battery and loosen two screws. After that you'll have access to the fan, both RAM sticks, the mass storage device and the wireless module. As is customary with Dell, they've included an extensive illustrated user handbook explaining how to switch out various components.
At 32 x 22 x 3.1 centimeters, the case of the 13-inch convertible PC is considerably bulkier than that of its 12-inch competitor, the HP EliteBook 2760p, as well as its predecessor, the Dell Latitude XT2. At 2.2 kilograms (~4.9 pounds), it also feels significantly heavier. Those measurements cross the boundaries of the subnotebook class by no small degree and present a marked disadvantage in terms of mobility.
Although the Dell Latitude XT3 can produce neither a USB 3.0 port nor a DisplayPort, the convertible PC deserves a considerably higher rating in the realm of connectivity options than the HP EliteBook 2760p. External displays can be connected not only through VGA, but also digitally via HDMI. Thanks to eSATA, it's also possible to use quick external mass storage devices without the hindrance of a slow USB 2.0 connection. The positioning of the connections is well thought-out and doesn't interfere with the notebook's accessibility when peripheral devices are connected. Unlike the Fujitsu LifeBook T902, despite the case's girth, the Latitude XT3 doesn't possess an optical drive. Missing ports can be supplemented using an ExpressCard/34. For stationary use, Dell offers a docking station that connects myriad stationary devices to the convertible PC with a single click. An example of this would be the E/Port II Replicator (452-11415, 170 Euros, ~$219), which offers additional USB 3.0, DVI-D and DisplayPort connections.
Intel's Centrino Advanced-N 6205 theoretically transfers up to 300 Mbit/s and can utilize both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. We didn't observe any conspicuous problems in our practical test, such as poor reception or breaks in the connection. As usual, Dell installed a separate Bluetooth module (Dell Wireless 380) for short range radio connections, and thanks to the integrated HD webcam, video chats are possible without any external devices. Neither of these features are universally applied: Depending on their base configuration, other variants with different equipment will only possess these features if they are individually selected in Dell's online store. Dell's WWAN module Dell Wireless 5550 is also only available on request. But the necessary antennae are pre-installed, so the upgrade is easy to do.
A smart card reader, fingerprint reader and assorted password options together offer a solid security base for our test device. Various Computrace services are also available for tracing and reacquiring the notebook. To physically secure the convertible PC, there is of course a Kensington lock slot for chaining the notebook to a desk. You can find more on the topic of notebook security in our FAQ article.
As mentioned, the notebook's components are easily accessible. In the user handbook you'll find detailed instructions and procedures for switching out individual parts. In addition to the WLAN slot, next to the usual internal connections there is also another half-height slot and a full-height slot. The latter fits a WWAN module or an mSATA SSD. The fan is accessible for cleaning if necessary.
Beyond the legal warranty requirement of 24 months, our test device offers 36 months of Dell Pro Support for the next business day. At the time of writing, we haven't found any further warranty options in the Dell online shop.
The keyboard is outfitted with 19 mm standard keys and operates well. With a mid-length travel, comfortable stroke and good click point, the input device is suitable for use by prolific typists. The keyboard construction is stable overall and only yields to pressure minimally. The layout of the keys conforms to the norm, and the high-contrast lettering of the keys is appealing. Additionally, the FN combinations are printed in an orange contrast color, making them easily distinguishable. In dark working environments you quickly come to appreciate the superb keyboard lighting. The keyboard brightness is adjustable and can therefore be customized to the individual user.
The touchpad supports the usual multi-touch gestures. The pad's glide and reactivity are good and make working with the pad a comfortable experience. However, while executing some multi-touch gestures you quickly reach the edge of the sensitive surface and have to start from a new position. Bigger touchpads offer more comfort here. The touchpad keys are separate from the main pad and function perfectly. Their slightly rubberized surface is pleasant to the touch.
The glossy keys that are relatives of the pointstick aren't quite so appealing. Their function is identical, but subjectively their feedback isn't as comfortable. The pointstick itself is by no means inferior to those of its competitors from Dell and Lenovo and operates with precision. Users who are new to this kind of control will have to figure it out before they obtain good results.
The display can be operated with your finger or the pen included in the packaging. Both input methods work with very high precision over the entire expanse of the panel. Even in the areas around the edge and in the corners we didn't see any operational abnormalities. The N-trig Digitizer does an excellent job and even climbs over the Fujitsu LifeBook T902's digitizer to the top rung.
The active, battery-powered input pen supports different pressure levels. This didn't work for us in some programs during our test, for instance Photoshop CS6. It functioned better in Art Rage 4, in which we were able to use 4 recognizably distinct pressure levels.
Directly compared with the HP EliteBook 2760p, subjectively our test device's stylus didn't offer as pleasant a writing experience. Depending on the way you hold the pen, it can scratch the surface harder than normal, and the stroke width fluctuates greatly depending on your angle. It's possible that after a longer period of familiarization you can obtain better results. But our impression after our short test is that the writing feel is unbalanced, which interferes with the theoretically very good prerequisite conditions for a comfortable writing experience.
The Dell Latitude XT3's lower resolution compared with the Fujitsu LifeBook T902 (1600x900 pixels) is responsible for the Dell computer's smaller desktop area, but the resolution also offers bigger icons, symbols and fonts. That has a positive influence on finger input and ensures a lower error rate when typing, sizing windows and rotating pictures with your finger.
The Dell Latitude XT3 is currently available with two different 13.3-inch displays. While both models have a resolution of 1366x768 pixels, white LEDs and a half-reflective surface, the only distinguishing feature is the maximum brightness. Dell's standard variant has a brightness of about 200 cd/m², and our test model, which is supposed to be suitable for use in sunny work environments, was specified as having a maximum brightness of about 300 cd/m².
Otherwise, the 13.3-inch display has the usual 16:9 aspect ratio and a point density of 118 dpi. The display surface and display size are well-balanced and the compromise will work for most people. A higher point density is available on for example the Fujitsu LifeBook T902, which at the same diagonal measurement accommodates 1600x900 pixels.
At nine different points on the screen we measured maximum brightness levels of 318 to 388 cd/m². That comes to an average of 358 cd/m², which is a very good value. Due to the relatively wide range of results, the illumination level only comes to an average of 82%. Viewing monochromatic display content, upon close observation we saw differences in brightness levels, but with normal use this wasn't noticeable. The brightness is more than sufficient for use indoors and can be dialed down considerably in most circumstances. Due to the half-reflective surface, it's necessary to select a higher brightness setting than you would on a matte display. But the reflective effect is nowhere near as intense as with glossy displays.
For use outdoors, it's possible to set the display to its maximum brightness even in battery mode. Thanks to the high level of brightness, it's much easier to work with this notebook than with tablets with reflective displays. Instead of positioning the device based on where the sun is and isn't, the user can position it based on his or her own preferences. Only under direct sunlight did the panel's brightness reach its limits and suffer a loss of usability.
Dell did a good job with the other aspects of the display. The contrast measured 725:1, rendering richer colors and a considerably deeper black than most standard notebook displays. The supported color space is much smaller than the sRGB color space, thus the Dell Latitude XT3 can only be used for graphics or photography in a limited capacity. In its factory state the notebook's grayscale resolution, color accuracy and color saturation weren't properly adjusted. We measured sizeable deviations from the ideal in every area. These results can be greatly improved with calibration, but the display will still be insufficient for work demanding accurate color rendition.
The Dell Latitude XT3's viewing angle stability is good, though it doesn't reach the very high level of the Fujitsu LifeBook T902. At extreme angles, starting around 160 degrees, the display darkened and image content was no longer recognizable. This occurred much later than it does on common TN panels, but earlier and more intensely than on some other business convertible PCs.
The Dell Latitude XT3 is currently in its second model year with its inner components unchanged. This isn't anything unusual for business convertibles. HPs EliteBook 27xx series for example has a similarly long product cycle. As a result, the computer's performance components lag an entire model generation behind and no longer represent the current state of technology. The Latitude XT3 still has an Intel QM67 chipset, an Intel Core i7-2640M CPU and Intel's HD Graphics 3000. As CPU alternatives Dell offers an Intel Core i3-2370M or an Intel Core i5-2520M. The buyer also has influence over the working memory and mass storage components. Our test device possessed 8 GB of RAM and a conventional 320 GB hard drive.
The dual-core Intel Core i7-2640M processor has all the relevant key technologies like hyper-threading and turbo boost at its command. Its performance consistently adjusted to various levels of demand, and no matter whether it was running single or multi-thread applications, it always provided the optimal level of computing power.
In Cinebench R10 (64-bit), for example, the CPU reached 5659 points (single-thread) and 11907 points (multi-thread). These results are good, though they're not on par with the current CPU generation. For comparison, in the Toshiba Tecra R950 the successor CPU Intel Core i7-3540M achieved 6326 points (single-thread) and 13307 points (multi-thread) in Cinebench R10 (64-bit). That's a performance difference of more than 10%, which will make itself apparent primarily during computationally intensive tasks.
The Dell Latitude XT3 converted MP3 files in iTunes (single-thread) at 47.4x speed and two movie files (multi-thread) in about three and four minutes. Even the difference between Dell's processor and the Intel Core i7-3520M CPU from the HP EliteBook 8570p becomes quite evident here. The bigger and more numerous the jobs, the more this contrast in performance affects their duration.
We didn't observe any reduction in performance in battery mode or under full load.
The system performance results from the interaction of all components relevant for performance. In everyday use, the effects of the relatively slow mass storage unit were especially palpable. Tasks like booting, and opening programs and files took markedly longer than on systems with solid-state drives. Another weak point is the graphics unit integrated into the CPU chip, which had difficulty with demanding 3D applications. For games, engineering applications and animation programs it's simply too weak and impractical. However, its performance is entirely sufficient for any other kind of task.
The application benchmarks PC Mark Vantage and PC Mark 7 finished with results of 7606 points and 2478 points. Those are both good scores, though as mentioned before they could be improved with a quicker mass storage device.
|PCMark Vantage Result||7606 points|
|PCMark 7 Score||2478 points|
As usual, Dell offers the Latitude XT3 with various mass storage options. The maximum capacity Dell offers doesn't exceed 320 GB, no matter whether you select a hard drive or another type of permanent storage. Anyone who wants something more would have to take matters into their own hands or order an additional mSATA drive. The regular drive bay only fits 7 mm drives, and the mSATA slot is limited to SATA II transfer speed. Our test model had a conventional Seagate hard drive with a maximum transfer rate of about 120 MB/s. At about 17 milliseconds, the drive's access times were considerably slower than those of solid-state drives and made the hard drive's responsiveness feel sluggish.
Intel's HD Graphics 3000 isn't quite as powerful as the current Intel HD Graphics 4000, but for most application scenarios that wasn't too apparent. Both cards play Full HD videos fluidly and both have achieved good results in Intel's Quick Sync (video conversion). Also, the Intel HD 4000's increased performance still isn't sufficient for running demanding 3D programs smoothly. For 3D games, 3D construction and animation programs, dedicated graphics cards are still necessary to provide the required graphics performance.
The results from the 3D benchmarks are correspondingly low: In 3DMark06 the notebook attained 4435 points and in 3DMark Vantage 2001 points. DirectX 11 isn't supported. The computer scored 6671 points in OpenGL Shading (Cinebench R10 64-bit) and 11.46 fps (Cinebench R11.4 64-bit).
|3DMark 06 Standard Score||4435 points|
|3DMark Vantage P Result||2001 points|
|3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score||33636 points|
|3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score||2979 points|
Thanks to the RAM working in dual-channel mode, the integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 can supply its full performance abilities. But that was only sufficient to run the games we tested at low and sometimes medium settings.
Although the Dell Latitude XT3 offers a native resolution of 1366x768 pixels, we weren't able to select this resolution internally or externally in the games we tested. The alternative is to fall back on 1400x900 or 1680x1050 pixels. However, you can force the system to use the WXGA standard resolution (not tested), which we explain in our FAQ article.
Despite the quickly whirring hard drive, under a low level of load the notebook's noise development can be described as very modest. With a sound pressure level of 30.8 dB(A), we only heard the quiet sound of the Dell Latitude XT3's hard drive motor. It would be possible with a solid-state drive to eliminate this sound too, since the fan runs considerably more quietly or not at all in this phase. Under medium load the sound pressure level increased to 37.1 dB(A), and under full load we measured 41.7 dB(A).
30.8 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB(A)
||37.1 / 41.7 dB(A)|
min: , med: , max: PCE-322A (15 cm distance)
At a maximum of 34.5 °C (94.1 °F), the case's temperatures can be classified as very low. However, you have to be careful where the fan blows out hot air. Here the underside heated up to 39.7 °C (103.5 °F), and while the fan was blowing the temperature rose to 49.2 °C (120.6 °F). Accidentally touching something that hot can certainly cause you to jerk your hand away without thinking.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.1 °C / 79 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+2.1 °C / 3.8 F).
The notebook's sound output is very treble-prone and has very little mid and bass tones. The maximum volume is relatively low and the speakers tend to crackle near the highest setting. This can be greatly improved with external speakers or headphones. The combined audio port is a joint microphone and headphone plug. Headset users will either have to acquire a corresponding model with just one jack or use an adapter.
From the power supply we measured a power consumption of between 9.6 watts up to 60 watts. At settings approximating everyday office use, the notebook will usually need about 14 watts. The display is a relatively hungry component, consuming about 4 watts more on the maximum vs. the minimum brightness level.
The standard battery equipment for Dell's Latitude XT3 is a lithium-ion battery with six-cells (44 Wh). This battery is included alongside the device. Dell also offers a lithium-ion battery with nine-cells (76 Wh) and an extended-life extra battery with nine-cells (97 Wh).
|Off / Standby||0.2 / 0.4 Watt|
|Idle|| 9.6 / 13.5 / 14.9 Watt|
47.5 / 60 Watt|
Considering that the consumption data isn't record breaking and the 44 Wh battery is cutting it close, the battery runtimes are sure to be average at best. In the Battery Eater Reader's test (energy-saving mode, minimum display brightness, wireless modules deactivated) the Dell Latitude XT3 ran for almost 6 hours while estranged from the power socket. But at more practical settings (display brightness about 150 cd/m², energy-saving mode, wireless on) in the WLAN test, this number dropped considerably, to about 3.5 hours. In the Battery Eater Classic test (minimum runtime, maximum display brightness, high-performance profile, wireless on) the convertible PC still lasted about an hour. You'll need either the power supply or an extra battery to make it through a whole work day on the Dell Latitude XT3.
The Dell Latitude XT3 is a solid business convertible PC that makes a convincing offer with its base of quality features. Except for its poor battery life, the device didn't show any critical weaknesses in any relevant testing area. Even though the performance components are a generation behind, even they accomplish the notebook's intended purpose and provide sufficient system performance for practical everyday use.
Limitations of lesser significance, like the pen tip that takes some getting used to, the comparatively slow mass storage device or the Intel graphics unit unsuitable for 3D tasks are either matters you can take into your own hands, or they're background issues for the computer's traditional target audience.
More relevant for the final purchasing decision could be the relatively heavy weight, the comparably high price and the display's lack of visibility at extreme angles. The buyer can't do much to fix those concerns. Anyone prepared to accept these drawbacks will be rewarded with a very bright display, a very configurable package and a very precise digitizer.
Specifically the digitizer and the display brightness surpass the Fujitsu LifeBook T902, which had our top spot in this area. This could constitute a decisive purchasing factor.