Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 6600U vs Intel Core i7-13800H

AMD Ryzen 5 6600U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 6600U

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600U is a processor for thin and light laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The Ryzen packs six of the eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.9 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm process at TSMC. Compared to the similar R5 6600H, the 6600U offers a lower base clock speed and a lower TDP.

In the 6000 series, AMD finally switched to the current RDNA 2 graphics architecture for the iGPU. The 6600U only offers the small Radeon 660M with 6 of the 12 CUs enabled and 1.9 GHz max. clock rate.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

Performance

The average 6600U in our database matches the Ryzen 7 5800U in multi-thread performance, making this Ryzen 5 series chip a great CPU for most activities as of mid 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's too much to allow for passively cooled designs.

The R5 6600U is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm manufacturing process for good, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-13800H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13800H

The Intel Core i9-13900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5.2 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.8 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 4 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports the full set of vPro Enterprise management features.

Performance

Thanks to the high core count and high clock speed, the Core i7-13800H should be faster than the older Core i9-12900HK. Therefore, the CPU is very well suited for all demanding use cases like gaming, content creation, and scientific calculations.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 6600UIntel Core i7-13800H
CodenameRembrandt-U (Zen 3+)Raptor Lake-H
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Raptor Lake-H
Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U compare2.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600U « 2.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H « 1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4500 MHz1800 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache3 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 1214 / 20
6 x 5.2 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP28 Watt45 Watt
Technology6 nm10 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2FCBGA1744
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEThread Director
iGPUAMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 6600U
34.3 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13800H
41.5 pt (69%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
80 Points (45%)
119.3 Points (67%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
408 Points (8%)
976 Points (18%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8491     avg: 9160     median: 9159.5 (9%)     max: 9828 Points
17591 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1420     avg: 1457     median: 1456.5 (61%)     max: 1493 Points
2017 Points (85%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 558     avg: 570     median: 570 (62%)     max: 582 Points
776 Points (85%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3419     avg: 3623     median: 3623 (9%)     max: 3827 Points
6714 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1361     avg: 1493     median: 1493 (9%)     max: 1625 Points
2765 Points (17%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 227     avg: 233     median: 233 (65%)     max: 239 Points
287 Points (80%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
17.2 Points (22%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.7 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6242 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
32097 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
54792 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11685 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
146.6 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6937 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
44320 MIPS (25%)
70500 MIPS (40%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5486 MIPS (65%)
6310 MIPS (74%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
71.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
212 fps (5%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
11.7 fps (21%)
20 fps (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.3 GB/s (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 323     avg: 488.5     median: 488.5 (6%)     max: 654 Seconds
337 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
415 Seconds (3%)
191 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9435     avg: 9908     median: 9908 (21%)     max: 10381 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
692 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 38061     avg: 41628     median: 41627.5 (32%)     max: 45194 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11630     avg: 12171     median: 12171 (30%)     max: 12712 Points
23253 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 65694     avg: 66719     median: 66719 (54%)     max: 67744 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 66512     avg: 67032     median: 67032 (54%)     max: 67552 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 66942     avg: 70708     median: 70708 (57%)     max: 74474 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10347     avg: 10513     median: 10513 (27%)     max: 10679 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15902     avg: 15918     median: 15918 (28%)     max: 15934 Points
29543 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5114     avg: 5340     median: 5339.5 (23%)     max: 5565 Points
12662 Points (53%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
1977 Points (49%)
2766 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
8310 Points (32%)
12876 Points (50%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1923 Points (61%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
7790 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1445     avg: 1477     median: 1483 (58%)     max: 1504 Points
1972 Points (77%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7034     avg: 7407     median: 7529 (13%)     max: 7658 Points
12880 Points (23%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1405     avg: 1481     median: 1481 (6%)     max: 1557 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6956     avg: 8603     median: 8602.5 (27%)     max: 10249 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6067     avg: 6383     median: 6382.5 (64%)     max: 6698 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 26824     avg: 33338     median: 33338 (33%)     max: 39852 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7529 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1483 Points (22%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
619 ms (1%)
477 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
217 Points (60%)
283 Points (78%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
274 Points (49%)
314 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1517 Points (57%)
1823 Points (68%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
44.6 Watt (8%)
150.1 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
41.9 Watt (8%)
155.6 Watt (28%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.8 Watt (6%)
8.6 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
8.9 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
17.8 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 6600U → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13800H → 160% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 12. 04:49:37

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14090 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14719 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757645377s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:38:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14090 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 14090 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14719 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 14719 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.058s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.059s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)