NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M is a professional middle class graphics card for mobile workstations (about 15"). It is based on the GeForce GT 330M graphics card with slower clock rates and therefore is a DirectX 10.1 chip that is produced in 40nm.
Due to a special BIOS and professional drivers, the FX 880M should perform noticeably better than a 330M in professional applications (like CAD, DCC, Rendering). Another advantage for professional users are the certified drivers that should ensure a bug free experience with the most common professional applications. Futhermore, the Quadro FX drivers contain profiles for these applications to ensure the best settings (similar to the game profiles in GeForce cards).
The Quadro FX 880M is also based on the GT216 core in 40nm. The shaders are based on the desktop GTX 200 architecture and therefore a bit improved compared to the previous generation cards.
Without load, the Quadro FX 880M is able to downclock to 135 / 270 / 135 MHz (chip / shader / memory clock).
The gaming performance of the FX 880M should be beyond the GT 330M, because of the different drivers. Gamers should choose a GeForce card because of the better game support.
The chip supports Optimus for automatic switching between dedicated and integrated graphics card (e.g. in the new Core i5 CPUs). Still Optimus was for example not integrated in the Lenovo Thinkpad W510.
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro NVS 150M is a business graphics adapater for notebooks. It is based on the GeForce 9200M GS consumer graphics card but features special drivers which are optimized for business applications. A shor list of the applications which are certified for the NVS line can be found here (including MS Office, Exceed, Notes, McAffee, pcAnywhere, Bloomberg, Reuters, Tradestation).
The gaming performance should be similar to the GeForce 9200M GS and therefore only suited for less demanding games with low details. Still the business drivers are not optimized for games and may therefore show a worse performance (or some bugs). The memory is clocked either with 700 MHz (DDR3) or 400 MHz (DDR2) which is noticable slower.
Compared to the Quadro NVS 160M, the 150M features a slower clock speed and only supports resolutions up to 1680x1050 (digital) or 1600x1200 (analog).
As the 9200M GS, the Quadro NVS 150M also supports PureVideo HD to decode HD videos with the graphics chip (and save current).
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M ► remove from comparison
For CAD and professional applications certified GPU based on the 8400M GS. The higher power consumption of 17 Watt versus 11 Watt of the 8400M GS indicates a higher performance.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M Quadro FX Series Codename N10P-GLM NB8M-GLM Architecture GT2xx Pipelines 48 - unified 8 - unified 16 - unified Core Speed 550 MHz 530 MHz 400 MHz Shader Speed 1210 MHz 1300 MHz 800 MHz Memory Speed 790 MHz 700 MHz 600 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 64 Bit 64 Bit Memory Type GDDR3, DDR3 GDDR2, GDDR3 GDDR3 Max. Amount of Memory 1024 MB 256 MB 256 MB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1 DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 Power Consumption 35 Watt 10 Watt 17 Watt technology 40 nm 65 nm 80 nm Notebook Size medium sized Date of Announcement 07.01.2010 15.08.2008 09.05.2007 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.de Features OpenGL 2.1 PowerMizer 7.0, HDR, designed for Vista, 128 Bit HDR, OpenGl 2.1 Information PCI-Express, max 1680x1050 bzw 1600x1200 (analog). Transistors 210 Million
Benchmarks min: 2558 avg: 2643 median: 2638.5 (1%) max: 2735 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2128 avg: 2203 median: 2149.5 (1%) max: 2385 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 28169 avg: 32291 median: 33331 (35%) max: 34331 Points
min: 13215 avg: 14212 median: 14211.5 (15%) max: 15208 Points
min: 13650 avg: 15054 median: 15053.5 (16%) max: 16457 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 18796 avg: 18980 median: 19002 (10%) max: 19137 Points
min: 5042 avg: 5520 median: 5520 (3%) max: 5998 Points
min: 5580 avg: 6010 median: 6010 (3%) max: 6440 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 13154 avg: 13217 median: 13185 (14%) max: 13298 Points
min: 3092 avg: 3265 median: 3264.5 (4%) max: 3437 Points
min: 3365 avg: 3372 median: 3372 (4%) max: 3379 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 6366 avg: 6401 median: 6378 (8%) max: 6473 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
1561 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
1490 Points (2%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) T7500 Quadro FX 360M 400 / 800 MHz 0.3 GB 2 GB 1490
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
6392 Points (8%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
min: 1728 avg: 1774 median: 1774 (2%) max: 1820 Points
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 Toshiba Tecra R10 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800) SP9300 Quadro NVS 150M 529 / 702 MHz 0.1 GB 2 GB 1728 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800) SP9300 Quadro NVS 150M 0.1 GB 3 GB 1820
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
1572 Points (2%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 Dell Precision M2300 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800) T7700 Quadro FX 360M 432 / 400 MHz 0.1 GB 1 GB 1572
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
47.8 Points (99%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
47.6 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
60.1 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
58 Points (86%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
24.4 Points (63%)
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 9.18 avg: 9.7 median: 9.7 (6%) max: 10.27 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 11.04 avg: 11.2 median: 11.2 (6%) max: 11.32 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 7.56 avg: 16 median: 16 (12%) max: 24.45 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 4.28 avg: 5.2 median: 5.2 (6%) max: 6.21 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.94 avg: 8 median: 8 (6%) max: 9.09 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 9.81 avg: 23.8 median: 23.8 (26%) max: 37.84 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 10 avg: 10.3 median: 10.3 (5%) max: 10.59 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 8.63 avg: 12.3 median: 12.3 (6%) max: 15.92 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.4 Points (81%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.4 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4809 avg: 4886 median: 4846 (3%) max: 5002 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
min: 2201 avg: 2516 median: 2515.5 (2%) max: 2830 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
2985 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 15.84 avg: 16 median: 16 (6%) max: 16.14 fps
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M → 100% n=5 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M → 35% n=5 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 37% n=5
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
129.2 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
90.5 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
50.4 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
155 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
42 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
29 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
12 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
58.8 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
30.4 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
16.1 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
9.7 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
124.1 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
42.2 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
35.4 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
21 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
75.4 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
29.8 33.4 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 32 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
18.2 20.6 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 19 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
12.7 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
79.3 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
45.7 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
47.8 ~ 47 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
20 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
39 ~ 30 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
12.8 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
59.7 60 131 147.3 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 100 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
19 19.1 20.5 23 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 20 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
179.6 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
65.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
42.3 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
93.3 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
32.4 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
48.7 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
28.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
225.7 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
60 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
59.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
29.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
28.2 fps
Quadro FX 360M:
10.1 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
Quadro FX 360M:
7.4 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
Quadro NVS 150M:
319 [X] Toshiba Tecra R10 Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 2.3GHz
Quadro NVS 150M
fps
Quadro FX 360M:
328 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
Quadro NVS 150M:
63 [X] Toshiba Tecra R10 Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 2.3GHz
Quadro NVS 150M
fps
Quadro FX 360M:
62 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
Quadro NVS 150M:
21 [X] Toshiba Tecra R10 Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 2.3GHz
Quadro NVS 150M
fps
Quadro FX 360M:
17 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
Quadro NVS 150M:
196.2 [X] Toshiba Tecra R10 Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 2.3GHz
Quadro NVS 150M
fps
Quadro FX 360M:
242.7 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Fifa 11 129.2 90.5 50.4 StarCraft 2 155 42 29 12 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 58.8 30.4 16.1 9.7 CoD Modern Warfare 2 124.1 42.2 35.4 21 Risen 75.4 32 19 12.7 Colin McRae: DIRT 2 79.3 47 30 12.8 Anno 1404 100 20 F.E.A.R. 2 179.6 65.9 42.3 Far Cry 2 93.3 32.39 Racedriver: GRID 48.7 28.9 Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare 225.7 60 59.9 Supreme Commander - FA Bench 29.92 28.18 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 4 4 1 6 2 1 5 5 1 6 1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Crysis - GPU Benchmark 10.07 Crysis - CPU Benchmark 7.39 F.E.A.R. 328 62 17 Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo 242.7 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 2 1 1 1
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M low med. high ultra QHD 4K F.E.A.R. 319 63 21 Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo 196.2 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 08. 00:05:24
#0 checking url part for id 1621 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 880 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 513 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:40:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.16s ... 0.161s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.161s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.161s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1621 +0.04s ... 0.201s
#9 got single benchmarks 1621 +0.021s ... 0.222s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 880 +0.002s ... 0.224s
#11 got single benchmarks 880 +0.012s ... 0.236s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 513 +0.002s ... 0.238s
#13 got single benchmarks 513 +0.009s ... 0.247s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.247s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.306s ... 0.553s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.553s
#17 Got 57 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.558s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.558s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.007s ... 0.566s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.036s ... 0.601s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.601s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.603s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)