Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Gold 4417U vs Intel Core i5-7287U

Intel Pentium Gold 4417U

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 4417U

The Intel Pentium Gold Processor 4417U is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry level laptops based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation (not Coffee Lake). It was announced in February 2019 and integrates two "big" cores (similar to the Core i3, i5 and i7 CPUs) clocked at 2.3 GHz (fixed, no Turbo Boost). The integrated graphics card is named Intel HD Graphics 610 and offers 12 EUs clocked at 300 - 950 MHz. The integrated memory controller supports slower memory speeds than the faster i3 and i5 models (DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600) and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

With a fixed clock speed of 2.3 GHz, the dual core CPU is clearly slower than models with Turbo Boost and high clock speeds for single thread performance. The multi thread performance however is also limited due to the two cores. The faster Core i5-8250U offers four processor cores and  fast Turbo Boost speeds therefore offers a much better performance. Still, the Pentium 4417U offers enough performance for daily tasks and non demanding applications.

Power Consumption

The chip is most likely manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. According to Intel it can be configured to 12.5 Watt at 800 MHz (cTDP-down) with a clearly reduced performance.

Intel Core i5-7287U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7287U

The Intel Core i5-7287U is a fast dual-core SoC for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. The CPU has two processor cores clocked at 3.3-3.7 GHz (two cores also up to 3.7 GHz). The processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper Threading. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 GPU with 64 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the 28-Watt CPU should be on par with the Core i7-7560U (2.4-3.8 GHz, also 64 MB eDRAM, 15 Watts), where the Turbo Boost is usually shorter compared to the 7287U due to the lower TDP. This means the i5 is still one of the faster dual-core processors and should be sufficient for most scenarios. Some games might still require a real quad-core processor and therefore nit run perfectly on the dual-core processor, despite Hyper Threading.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 650 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1100 MHz and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 920MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Pro 550, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for dual-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

ModelIntel Pentium Gold 4417UIntel Core i5-7287U
SeriesIntel Kaby Lake RefreshIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameKaby Lake RefreshKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Core i7-8650U compare1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U compare1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U compare1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U compare1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U « 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U « 3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2300 MHz3300 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 4
TDP15 Watt28 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1356BGA1356
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR3 Memory Controller, HyperThreadingDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 610 (300 - 950 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$161 U.S.$304 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
203 Points (23%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
472 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
228 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
89 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.6 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.1 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3570 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
8012 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
665 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
21.2 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1792 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
15.5 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
81.1 fps (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.4 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3204 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
39.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
922 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2831     avg: 3011     median: 3010.5 (8%)     max: 3190 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 28577     avg: 28749     median: 28749 (23%)     max: 28921 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 27361     avg: 27522     median: 27521.5 (22%)     max: 27682 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 29007     avg: 29032     median: 29032 (24%)     max: 29057 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2590     avg: 2591     median: 2590.5 (7%)     max: 2591 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3635     avg: 3644     median: 3644 (6%)     max: 3653 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1369     avg: 1398     median: 1398 (6%)     max: 1427 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 897     avg: 899     median: 898.5 (38%)     max: 900 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2160     avg: 2193     median: 2193 (4%)     max: 2226 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2695 Points (27%)
min: 4419     avg: 4497     median: 4497 (45%)     max: 4575 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5248 Points (6%)
min: 8230     avg: 8839     median: 8838.5 (10%)     max: 9447 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2599 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5029 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
4882 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2254 Points (44%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5089 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2389 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
6053 Points (49%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5722 Points (52%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4999 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
5090 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
5280 Points (14%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2162 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
165.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
16702 Points (15%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
102 Points (21%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Gold 4417U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7287U → 168% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 28. 16:08:47

#0 checking url part for id 11489 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8452 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:39:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11489 +0.003s ... 0.029s

#7 got single benchmarks 11489 +0.012s ... 0.041s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8452 +0.003s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 8452 +0.006s ... 0.05s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.146s ... 0.196s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.221s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)