Oppo Reno5
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 44 MPix f/2.4, 24mm
Pricecompare
Average of 4 scores (from 34 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo Reno5
Source: Speed Magazine
The OPPO Reno5 4G has everything that its pricier brother offers—except for the 5G capability and higher-specced processor. But for a P5,000 price cut, those on a budget can let go of those features, especially since the performance on the 4G and 5G variant is virtually the same. On its own, the Reno5 4G offers users with modern mobile solutions and technologies that make the smartphone experience extra fun.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/23/2021
Source: Unbox
Even if it is more expensive than the regular Reno5 4G, the Marvel Edition is a great collectors item with all the customization OPPO has made to it–from the packaging, included accessories, back panel, to the visual UI and special contents inside the phone. The Reno5 4G Marvel Edition is a unique offering, as you can only count the number of official Marvel-branded gadgets that actually offer a decent set of specs.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2021
Source: Yugatech
Looking at the Reno5 series, the 5G variant is the best you can get. However, it’s not for everyone, given the higher price tag. Some users might be contented with having 4G LTE, 90Hz refresh rate, good quad-rear camera setup, and a 4,310mAh battery with 50W fast charging at a lower price. And that’s where the Reno5 4G comes in.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/18/2021
Source: Pokde
Despite the phone being a looker and performing well in most segments. I feel that the price is a bit too high. If you don’t mind spending that much, you’ll be getting a 5G-ready smartphone (whenever that arrives here in Malaysia) as well as a good OLED display with 90Hz refresh rate. Not to forget, a 65W fast charger is definitely something that you want if you’re always on the go.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 68% performance: 77% mobility: 77% workmanship: 82%
Foreign Reviews
Source: News Bytes DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/29/2021
Source: Chip Online TR TR→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/26/2021
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: TechTimes VN VN→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 85% performance: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN
Positive: Premium design; great built quality; excellent cameras; beautiful display; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/12/2021
Source: FPT shop VN→EN
Positive: High performance; support 5G; premium design; great built quality; very quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/03/2021
Source: FPT shop VN→EN
Positive: Long battery life; quick charging; high performance; nice quad cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2021
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; high performance; support 5G.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2021
Source: Genk VN→EN
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; support 5G; decent cameras; good performance; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN
No ratings Positive: Elegant design; nice display; long battery life; great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/18/2021
Source: Zing VN→EN
Positive: Attractive design; good price; big screen; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/02/2021
Source: TechTimes VN VN→EN
Positive: Decent processor; nice performance; great display; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/02/2021
Source: Cell Phones VN→EN
Positive: Nice gaming performance; good cooling system; decent display; quick charging; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2021
Source: Genk VN→EN
Positive: Beautiful design; excellent cameras; long battery life; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/19/2021
Source: Tinh Te VN→EN
Positive: Slim size; light weight; modern design; nice cameras; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/12/2021
Source: VNReview VN→EN
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; long battery life; decent cameras; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2021
Source: FPT shop VN→EN
Positive: Excellent cameras; modern design; very quick charging; powerful processor; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/04/2021
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN
Positive: Excellent cameras; powerful hardware; high performance; beautiful design; impressive battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/02/2021
Source: FPT shop VN→EN
Positive: Attractive price; nice cameras; quick charging; elegant design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/01/2021
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; good price; nice cameras; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/31/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; high performance; nice cameras; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/31/2020
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; nice quad cameras; quick charging; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Smart AI cameras; modern design; slim size; light weight; fast charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; decent display; good hardware; high performance; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: Genk VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Slim size; light weight; beautiful design; excellent cameras; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: Genk VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; impressive cameras; quick charging; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; powerful hardware; impressive cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: Danviet VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; beautiful design; great built quality; very quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: Genk VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; powerful processor; nice quad cameras; quick charging; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/11/2020
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 618: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 730) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 720G: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 465 cores (two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2.3 GHz and six small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz) and a fast X15 LTE modem (up to 800 Mbit download). The SoC is manufactured in the modern 8 nm process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.40":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.80.5%: This rating is slightly above average, there are somewhat more devices with worse ratings. However, clear purchase recommendations look different.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.